Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realtravel: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 22:17, 8 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Also, none of the foreign language interwikis actually exist. --Core desat 03:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Realtravel

Pure advertising. -- RHaworth 22:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - Spammy, probably best if just deleted, or translated from one of foreign language versions it lists. BlackBear 23:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article may be or at least appear to be an advertising attempt, but it isn't any different from SideStep or the like. It needs to be revised a bit but I don't think it deserves deletion. --64.142.82.240 07:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Media mentions seem non trivial and enough to show notibility.--Dacium 04:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Advertising, lists fake sources/interwiki links +Hexagon1 ^(t) 08:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, Hexagon1 nailed it. Realkyhick 17:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete The USA Today article cited appears to make absolutely no mention of the site. --Infrangible 01:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Checked, sources accurate; USA article has company reference as 2 words.Talkterms 06:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.  ''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''. Also, none of the foreign language interwikis actually exist. --[[User:Coredesat|Core]][[User talk:Coredesat|<span style="color:#006449;">desat</span>]] 03:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 ===[[Realtravel]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}
 :{{la|Realtravel}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realtravel|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 March 28#{{anchorencode:Realtravel}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 Pure advertising. -- [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] 22:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
@@ Line 7: / Line 14: @@
 This article may be or at least appear to be an advertising attempt, but it isn't any different from [[SideStep]] or the like. It needs to be revised a bit but I don't think it deserves deletion. --[[User:64.142.82.240|64.142.82.240]] 07:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
-:'''&nbsp;<font color="#CC6600">Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached</font>'''<br/><small>&nbsp;Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, {{{1|<span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 00:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)}}}</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
+:'''&nbsp;<span style="color:#CC6600;">Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached</span>'''<br/><small>&nbsp;Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, {{{1|<span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 00:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)}}}</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 *'''Keep''' Media mentions seem non trivial and enough to show notibility.--[[User:Dacium|Dacium]] 04:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * '''Speedy delete''' Advertising, lists fake sources/interwiki links +[[User:Hexagon1|Hexagon1]] <sup>([[User talk:Hexagon1|t]])</sup> 08:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Speedy delete,''' Hexagon1 nailed it. [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] 17:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Speedy delete''' The USA Today article cited appears to make absolutely no mention of the site. --[[User:Infrangible|Infrangible]] 01:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' Checked, sources accurate; USA article has company reference as 2 words.[[User:Talkterms|Talkterms]] 06:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>