Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhigiri: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:56, 9 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Deletion is not a substitute for cleanup. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Santhigiri

Appears to be an ad for a non-notable cult. No references except to the ashram's own site. Neon Merlin 18:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff{^Calvin_Hobbes 18:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff{^Calvin_Hobbes 18:39, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and protect Karunakara Guru, a related article, seems to be undergoing this same process. I recommend the same treatment. a little insignificant 20:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A simple gnews search gives 102] reliable source references, not all of them significant, but enough to show notability. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 21:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
keep and cleanup - subject has been covered by reliable sources on dozens of occasions: The Hindu covers medical clinic Express Buzz covers VP dying The Hindu covers opening of 3rd branch healing practice mentioned prominently by Asia Times and many more. Also many otherwise small mentions saying things like "a renowned spiritual centre" or "well-known" showing that it is an important organization in India. (Additionally, there are certainly non-English sources given that English isn't the countries primary language) --ThaddeusB (talk) 03:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. ThaddeusB has given enough evidence to show the notability. Salih (talk) 04:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on the sources found by other editors. Edward321 (talk) 00:52, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Quite a few sources showing notability. Priyanath ^talk 21:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''keep'''. Deletion is not a substitute for cleanup. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 00:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 ===[[Santhigiri]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|Santhigiri}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Santhigiri|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhigiri]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhigiri|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 July 13#{{anchorencode:Santhigiri}}|View log]])</noinclude>
@@ Line 9: / Line 15: @@
 *'''Keep''' A simple gnews search gives [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22santhigiri+Ashram%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&start=0 102]] [[WP:RS|reliable source]] references, not all of them significant, but enough to show notability. -<span style="color:#B13E0F">SpacemanSpiff</span><sup>[[User:SpacemanSpiff|Calvin]]&#8225;[[User talk:SpacemanSpiff|Hobbes]]</sup> 21:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 *'''keep and cleanup''' - subject has been covered by reliable sources on dozens of occasions: [http://www.hindu.com/2006/04/05/stories/2006040502970200.htm The Hindu covers medical clinic] [http://www.expressbuzz.com/edition/story.aspx?Title=Santhigiri+Ashram+VP+passes+away&artid=drkGC1iDik4=&SectionID=lMx/b5mt1kU=&MainSectionID=lMx/b5mt1kU=&SEO=&SectionName=tm2kh5uDhixGlQvAG42A/07OVZOOEmts Express Buzz covers VP dying] [http://www.hinduonnet.com/2002/05/21/stories/2002052105810400.htm The Hindu covers opening of 3rd branch] [http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/GG02Df01.html healing practice mentioned prominently by Asia Times] and many more.  Also many otherwise small mentions saying things like "a renowned spiritual centre" or "well-known" showing that it is an important organization in India. (Additionally, there are certainly non-English sources given that English isn't the countries primary language) --[[User:ThaddeusB|ThaddeusB]] ([[User talk:ThaddeusB|talk]]) 03:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''. ThaddeusB has given enough evidence to show the notability. <span style="">[[User:Salih|<span style="color:#e90;">Salih</span>]] [[User talk:Salih|(<span style="color:#08c;">talk</span>)]]</span> 04:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' based on the sources found by other editors. [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 00:52, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''. Quite a few sources showing notability. [[User:Priyanath|Priyanath]]&nbsp;<i><sup>[[User talk:Priyanath|talk]]</sup></i> 21:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>