Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saphan Khwai BTS Station: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:59, 9 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saphan Khwai BTS Station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think there is enough evidence of WP:Notability for this single station to warrant its inclusion as a stand-alone article. I previously redirected individual BTS station articles to the articles for their respective lines, but they were restored by Mr.BuriramCN. (I haven't been able to engage in discussion with him.) I'm testing the water with this AfD, and may nominate the other related articles later. Paul_012 (talk) 11:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:48, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:48, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to be an actual station as opposed to just a tram stop. We generally keep all articles on stations, including urban rapid transit stations. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I wasn't aware of such precedence. If that is the case perhaps it could be mentioned at WP:RAILOUTCOMES and/or WP:STATION?--Paul_012 (talk) 04:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Necrothesp. Mackensen (talk) 16:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Train stations are inherently notable. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you please clarify the statement? What makes something "inherently notable" according to Wikipedia policy? WP:N only says that "No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists." --Paul_012 (talk) 04:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus made on prior AfDs has determined that train stations, no matter what size or in what country, are notable as long as sources confirm it exists (or existed for that matter). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:05, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for clarifying. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As has been mentioned, train stations are considered to be notable per WP:OUTCOMES if WP:V is satisfied, as part of the Wikipedia's role as a gazzeteer under the Five Pillars. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:57, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''keep'''. ([[Wikipedia:non-admin closure|non-admin closure]]) <span style="outline:1px dotted #d1bfa4;"><span style="color:#ffffff;">&#124;</span> [[User:Uncle Milty|<span style="color:#000051;">'''Uncle Milty'''</span>]] &#124; [[User talk:Uncle Milty|<span style="color:#005c00;">talk</span>]] <span style="color:#ffffff;">&#124;</span></span> 01:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
 ===[[Saphan Khwai BTS Station]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|P}}
 :{{la|Saphan Khwai BTS Station}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saphan Khwai BTS Station|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 8#{{anchorencode:Saphan Khwai BTS Station}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Saphan_Khwai_BTS_Station Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 7: / Line 13: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Thailand|list of Thailand-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup> 12:48, 8 November 2013 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Transportation|list of Transportation-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup> 12:48, 8 November 2013 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Keep'''. Appears to be an actual station as opposed to just a tram stop. We generally keep all articles on stations, including urban rapid transit stations. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 13:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
+**I wasn't aware of such precedence. If that is the case perhaps it could be mentioned at [[WP:RAILOUTCOMES]] and/or  [[WP:STATION]]?--[[User:Paul 012|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012|talk]]) 04:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' per Necrothesp. [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 16:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' - Train stations are inherently notable. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 09:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
+**Could you please clarify the statement? What makes something "inherently notable" according to Wikipedia policy? [[WP:N]] only says that "No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists." --[[User:Paul 012|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012|talk]]) 04:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
+:::Consensus made on prior [[WP:OUTCOMES|AfDs]] has determined that train stations, no matter what size or in what country, are notable as  long as sources confirm it exists (or existed for that matter). [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 07:05, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
+::::Okay, thanks for clarifying. --[[User:Paul 012|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012|talk]]) 14:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''. As has been mentioned, train stations are considered to be notable per [[WP:OUTCOMES]] if [[WP:V]] is satisfied, as part of the Wikipedia's role as a [[gazzeteer]] under the [[WP:5P|Five Pillars]]. - [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub>[[User talk:The Bushranger|<span style="color:maroon;">One ping only</span>]]</sub> 23:57, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>