Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Lynch: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
(39 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br>The result of the debate was '''DELETE'''[[User:Gwalla|<nowiki></nowiki>]] — [[User:Gwalla|Gwalla]] | [[User talk:Gwalla|Talk]] 05:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Sarah Lynch]]=== |
===[[Sarah Lynch]]=== |
||
Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Keep''' [[User:Matthewleung87|Matthewleung87]] 14:08, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' [[User:Matthewleung87|Matthewleung87]] 14:08, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - can the sockpuppets JoJo/Jamesss/Fargomargo/Matthewleung87 be kiled please? [[User:Proto|Proto]] 14:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - can the sockpuppets JoJo/Jamesss/Fargomargo/Matthewleung87 be kiled please? [[User:Proto|Proto]] 14:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' — no references cited and unable to confirm the veracity of this page via google. It does appear to be a hoax. — [[User:RJHall|RJH]] 15:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''', hoax. [[User:Alphax|Alphax]] <sup>[[User talk:Alphax|τ]][[Special:Emailuser/Alphax|ε]][[Special:Contributions/Alphax|χ]]</sup> 15:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' Well-written, but patently ridiculous nonsense. --[[User:Habap|Habap]] 15:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*Sockpuppets are like [[Stormtroopers]]: There are a lot of them, and they're never effective. [[User:jasonglchu|jglc]] | [[User talk:Jasonglchu|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasonglchu|c]] 15:15, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. Major Strasser has been shot. Round up the usual sockpuppets. --[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] 15:38, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' Die, sockpuppets, die! [[User:Columbia|Columbia]] 15:43, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' yet again. SP's begone. --[[User:Etacar11|Etacar11]] 17:04, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. Another hoax article. Needless to say, there was no Australian Federal Police Deputy Commissioner by that name except in the sockpuppet kingdom. [[User:Capitalistroadster|Capitalistroadster]] 20:08, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' I respek that phat b#tch!--[[User:64.229.218.142|64.229.218.142]] 20:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*I see no votes of "Delete; cute, though" or "Delete; nice tits, though" (like a couple of her buddies in this collection of hoaxing vandalism), so I won't research this enough to cast a vote. [[User:Barno|Barno]] 20:48, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' Not factual. --[[User:Xcali|Xcali]] 22:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' hoax [[User:Pburka|Pburka]] 02:44, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep'''-as she does indeed have nice tits '[[User:TagTeam|TagTeam]] 07:42, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam' |
|||
**<small> Users only edits are to vote keep on Longhair's VFD nominations. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|<small>(Check!)</small>]] 07:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) </small> |
|||
*'''Delete'''. Hoax, too many sockpuppets. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|<small>(Check!)</small>]] 07:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' - Sockpuppet-backed hoax. This is a recording. --[[User:FCYTravis|FCYTravis]] 09:16, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep'''I'd like some evidence it's not real, seems very well researched.- '[[User:Freezer|Freezer]] 09:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Freezer' |
|||
**<small>Account created today. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|<small>(Check!)</small>]] 09:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Delete''' - Unverifiable nonsense (or experiment) backed up by sockpuppets (or equivalent). (''It also seems that Stormtroopers rarely hit their targets'') - [[User:Skysmith|Skysmith]] 11:08, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
**Hey man, i ainta a darn sockpuppy, i jus' hate ur gay bureacracy and i really despise this "western freedom" thing. Too many lies ...--[[User:65.92.123.75|65.92.123.75]] 17:15, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
***Fine. Then you're a meatpuppet with only two edits to your name. I'm sorry, I mean, your number. [[User:jasonglchu|jglc]] | [[User talk:Jasonglchu|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasonglchu|c]] 17:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' - A definite hoax. [[User:Wikistyler|Wikistyler]] |
|||
Definitely not a hoax, obviously sockpuppets are being used to get all these delete votes. Sure, they may have different IP's, but for all we know they could be different people. I think the burden is on them to prove they are not socks- '[[User:JoJo|JoJo]] 05:08, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo' |
|||
*'''Delete'''. Hoax. [[User:Postdlf|Postdlf]] 05:25, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*lol, such obvious sockpuppetry. '''Delete''' [[User:Gracefool|··gracefool]] |[[User talk:gracefool|☺]] 12:24, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''delete''' not factual, hoax, search of Australian Federal Police site shows no Sarah Lynch ever served as a deputy police commissioner during 1996-2002: http://www.afp.gov.au/afp/system/dynamic/query.asp?query=sarah+lynch&t=0&r=1&n=1 [[User:Clarkk|clarkk]] 14:44, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
::just to flog a dead horse: John Davies was appointed Deputy Commissioner in Sept. 2001 replacing Mick Keelty according to http://www.afp.gov.au/afp/page/Media/2001/0927deputycommissioner.htm. [[User:Clarkk|clarkk]] 14:52, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' - hoax per above. And such blatant sock puppetry needs putting where it belongs. -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 14:50, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''', I would like evidence this is a hoax[[User:Gateman1997|Gateman1997]] 18:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:''This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''<span style="color:red;">Please do not edit this page</span>'''.'' </div> |