Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergey Bushuyev (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Sergey Bushuyev

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Sergey Bushuyev
• Articles for deletion/Sergey Bushuyev (2nd nomination)

Sergey Bushuyev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no reason why it was kept in 2009. No notability was found except "Modern Ukraine Encyclopedia" which has in it's criteria EVERY doctor of sciences in Ukraine which are 19,000 even in last 25 years awarded. Celegans (talk) 00:22, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

• Keep He meets criteria of WP:PROF "In 1988 he became Professor in Strategic Project Management and Organizational Development at Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture KNUCA, now head of the Department of Project management at KNUCA ... He is a member of the editorial board of the International Journal of Project Management (impact factor 4.06 [1]) published by IPMA," Sergei Gutnikov (talk) 13:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
  • None of becoming a professor, heading a department, belonging to an editorial board, or having a meaningless number attached to a journal are sufficient to pass any WP:PROF criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:31, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

References

• Delete. His citation record isn't strong enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1, his association with the academies discussed in the article appears to be as a researcher rather than the kind of honorary membership that would pass #C3, and there seems to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
• Keep. He meets WP:PROF#C2 "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." He received Honored Worker of Science and Technology of Ukraine in 2004 as confirmed on a Ukranian government site. Sergei Gutnikov (talk) 10:52, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
  • You are only allowed one "keep"/"delete" per AfD. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:13, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:16, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per David.~ Winged Blades^Godric 10:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
• Delete. Could not find enough to establish notability under WP:PROF. Does not seem to pass WP:BIO either. The journal mentioned is indeed selective, and of reasonably high impact (http://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=19696&tip=sid&clean=0), but the subject's involvement is not enough to establish WP notability. If he were the EIC of the journal, we could consider keeping as per WP:PROF criterion 8. But he is not.--Eric Yurken (talk) 15:29, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.