Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 28: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:44, 10 February 2023

< February 27	March 1 >

February 28

File:Ban Raposa Imortal.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Ponyo (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 01:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vídeo 1406644035410-V 1 1.webm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Ponyo (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, probably ripped from a video site, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 01:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PhyoMinThein CM.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Callanecc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

not user's own work, photo grabbed from Phyo Min Thein Facebook page. (photo) Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 04:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per copyright issues cited by nom. --Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 07:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Classic Hispano-Moresque pattern in blue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

possible derivative of non-free content (2d artwork) FASTILY 08:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clown fountain.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

derivative of non-free content, there is no FOP for 3D works in the USA FASTILY 08:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CKM Dhananjai.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Portland Fire alternate.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: just a portion of the full logo. Provides no educational value. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kurradu ACD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. - Vivvt (Talk) 09:27, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SPOC CubeSat Mission Patch.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo? Not necessarily self as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MOCI CubeSat Mission Patch.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo? Not necessarily self as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Northern Red Knight Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo, Logo is not necessarily uploaders to re-license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DangerousMuse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Relicensed to non-free album cover, I'll remove it from the article in a sec. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like an album cover, if it is it's no necessarily an own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free album cover and remove from Dangerous Muse as its primary usage is not the artists article. Salavat (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mike Young Sorceress 2002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails NFCC 3(a) - The character is already depicted in the infobox, is another non-free image really necessary? Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HillmanImpSingerChamoisRallyConversionBrochures.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reasoning. Displaying a scan of a brochure dies not place it in the public domain Whpq (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mil mascaras hof.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The original flickr picture is published under the CC-BY-NC license - incompatible with Wikipedia. XXN, 20:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete As creator, I've requested this to be speedy deleted.LM2000 (talk) 21:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GoodGuyWikipedian.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work, the original image on background ("Good Guy Greg") is considered copyrighted unless it's source/author it's not known and there is no evidence that it was released under a free license. XXN, 21:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in a previous discussion on this image, please see the [Non-free content guidelines]. In this instance, not only is it a meme (photographer unknown, despite many opportunities to come forward), but it is also not used in a manner likely to deprive the copyright holder or subject of commercial or other opportunities, used minimally, and overall has a strong Fair Use case. ♥GlamRock♥ 19:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GlamRock: Fair Use policy is for files used in article namespaces only. If the photographer is unknown, or the license under which the picture was released is not known, then we consider that picture copyrighted by default per the "precautionary principle". XXN, 20:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-free derivative work. The image is not being used under our non-free content policy so fair use arguments do not apply. -- Whpq (talk) 12:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JONBROD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flickrwash. XXN, 21:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What does Flickrwash mean? {Starshine60 (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Starshine60: c:COM:Flickrwash. --XXN, 22:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

i reached out to Jon Brod's company to get access to the photo. They told me this is the free licensed one that is regularly given to CNBC etc. it's legit... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starshine60 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to reach out to them again to confirm the exact license by following Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. -- Whpq (talk) 02:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Idoling at japan expo 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@XXN: Looks like it's since been changed to Public Domain? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Callanecc: Yep. My talk page notification was effective. Thank you Hatix for sync-ing licenses! This discussion can be closed now, and this file - kept, and then transferred to Commons. XXN, 12:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CannonPlace.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image appears to be part of a professional photo shoot. See http://timothysoararchive.co.uk/project/31831 for this and other similar images. We would need OTRS confirmation Whpq (talk) 22:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jason Flom Central Park October 2009.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not possible anymore to verify authorship & licensing status for this photo. XXN, 23:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Baliles.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bad link to source. It's impossible to verify the licensing status. Also affected File:John Baliles thumb.png. XXN, 23:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The same issue at File:Jack Berry.jpg + File:Jack Berry thumb.png. Same uploader. XXN, 00:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - this is the opening screen from https://vimeo.com/160739019 which has a non-commercial CC license, and not CC-BY-SA as claimed by the uploader. -- Whpq (talk) 02:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.