Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squaremouth (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Ronhjones|<b style="border:1px solid #dfdfdf;color:green; padding:1px 3px;background:#FFD">Ron<span style="color:red">h</span>jones&nbsp;</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Ronhjones|&nbsp;(Talk)]]</sup> 23:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
===[[Squaremouth]]===
===[[Squaremouth]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squaremouth}}</ul></div>
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squaremouth}}</ul></div>
:{{la|Squaremouth}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squaremouth (3rd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 17#{{anchorencode:Squaremouth}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Squaremouth_(3rd_nomination) Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Squaremouth}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squaremouth (3rd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 2#{{anchorencode:Squaremouth}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Squaremouth_(3rd_nomination) Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources|Squaremouth}})
:({{Find sources|Squaremouth}})
What is the encyclopedic reason of this article? Simple Autopromotion.
What is the encyclopedic reason of this article? Simple Autopromotion.
Line 11: Line 17:


In my opinion, I think the same way; this article is self-referential and self-promotional. The essence of this article is not encyclopedic.
In my opinion, I think the same way; this article is self-referential and self-promotional. The essence of this article is not encyclopedic.
What is reason and purpose of this article? This company is known in how many countries? How many offices are there around the world? How many people work in these offices? Why does Wikipedia-English have so many American companies who want to self-label themselves as “notable”? Should we not think more globalized? Is USA the only country where the English language is spoken? What should we think about other companies that are better known in other continents?
What is reason and purpose of this article? This company is known in how many countries? How many offices are there around the world? How many people work in these offices? Why does Wikipedia-English have so many American companies who want to self-label themselves as “notable”? Should we not think more globalized? Is USA the only country where the English language is spoken? What should we think about other companies that are better known in other continents? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/146.185.183.119|146.185.183.119]] ([[User talk:146.185.183.119|talk]]) 14:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:MV Boli;">[[User:Dusti|'''<span style="color:#ff0000;">D</span><span style="color:#ff6600;">u</span><span style="color:#009900;">s</span><span style="color:#0000ff;">t</span><span style="color:#6600cc;">i</span>''']][[User talk:Dusti|<sup>*Let's talk!*</sup>]]</span> 00:21, 24 September 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:55%;" />
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 01:55, 2 October 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:55%;" />
*'''Delete''' This article appears to violate [[WP:PROMOTION]], as there is little content apart from the ''very'' basic history of the company and what services they offer. -- [[User:Jkudlick|Jkudlick]] ([[User talk:Jkudlick|talk]]) 04:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 16:23, 11 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Squaremouth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What is the encyclopedic reason of this article? Simple Autopromotion.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, I think the same way; this article is self-referential and self-promotional. The essence of this article is not encyclopedic. What is reason and purpose of this article? This company is known in how many countries? How many offices are there around the world? How many people work in these offices? Why does Wikipedia-English have so many American companies who want to self-label themselves as “notable”? Should we not think more globalized? Is USA the only country where the English language is spoken? What should we think about other companies that are better known in other continents? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.185.183.119 (talk) 14:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:21, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:55, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.