User talk:Alessandra Napolitano: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→An expose on fsck in the NYT: new section |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retired}} |
|||
'''Welcome!''' |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Hello, Alessandra Napolitano, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome]] to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Alessandra Napolitano|your contributions]]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few things to keep in mind as you start editing: |
|||
Based on behavioural evidence (a keen interest in arbitration and AFDs) and checkuser data, it is apparent that this account is operated by the banned [[User:John254]]. I have therefore blocked it indefinitely. [[User:AGK|<span style="color:black;">'''AGK'''</span>]] [[User talk:AGK#top|[•]]] 21:57, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*We're here to build an encyclopedia, but you probably knew that already. Still, it's important. |
|||
==MfD nomination of [[User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper]]== |
|||
*Be nice to other users. It's a lot easier to get along people when you're nice and when they're nice. |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|30px]] [[User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper]], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 16:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
*Don't worry too much about the rules. The only things that will get you immediately blocked from editing are clearly disruptive, so go, be bold, make changes, and have a blast. |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper]]== |
|||
*You'll probably see other users using jargon like WP:CIVIL or WP:V (sometimes without the WP: at the beginning). If you want to know what these are, type them into the search bar at the top of every page and hit enter. |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as [[:User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper]], is not in accordance with our [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Under [[WP:CSD#G3|section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], the page has been nominated for deletion. |
|||
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]. Please remember to [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign]] your messages on [[Help:Using talk pages|discussion page]]s using four [[tilde]]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this way we know who says what, and when, in discussions. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{help me}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! [[User:Lifebaka|<font color="green">''lifebaka''</font>]][[User talk:Lifebaka|'''++''']] 05:32, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. <!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 17:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Wrong section at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not == |
|||
Hi. I think you put [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWhat_Wikipedia_is_not&action=historysubmit&diff=461810746&oldid=461806561 this edit] in the wrong section of [[Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not]], or you thought that the section "Wikipedia is not a democracy" is part of the section above it, which it isn't. Perhaps you would like to move or delete that edit? Regards, --[[User:Bob K31416|Bob K31416]] ([[User talk:Bob K31416|talk]]) 21:02, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:The comment is relevant to the "not a democracy" section. Exactly what sort of non-voting, undemocratic consensus can be determined from 425,198 bytes of discussion? [[User:Alessandra Napolitano|Alessandra Napolitano]] ([[User talk:Alessandra Napolitano#top|talk]]) 22:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== inre [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prosper Masquelier]] == |
|||
I've been working on the article for [[Prosper Masquelier]], fixing someone's poor trans-wiki of the article from fr.Wikipedia, adding proper reliable sources, correcting errors created by the mis-translation to English, removing hyperbole, and making the whole thing properly encyclopedic per '''OUR''' manual of style.[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Prosper_Masquelier&action=historysubmit&diff=462046374&oldid=461841787] More to do, as I found far more sources than seemed the nominator here. God love the French, but they use a skewed set of guidelines and policies... similar to, but not quite the same as, ours... and per '''OUR''' policies and guidelines, I think the GNG is met. More to do and I'll keep working on it. Best, '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 03:25, 23 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Changed to keep. Thanks for informing me about this. [[User:Alessandra Napolitano|Alessandra Napolitano]] ([[User talk:Alessandra Napolitano#top|talk]]) 06:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Searching through fr.Wikipedia was a surreal experience. Your writing "''massively'' different notability criteria" is an understatement. Our standards might be confusing for newcomers and sometimes seem as over-complicated, but they work. Their's are simply bizarre. :) '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 09:22, 23 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Articles for deletion/William S. Dalton == |
|||
Hello, |
|||
Could you please take another look at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William S. Dalton]]. I've responded to the copyright concern. Thank you. [[User:Cullen328|'''<font color="green">Cullen</font>'''<sup><font color="purple">328</font></sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<font color="blue">''Let's discuss it''</font>]] 06:50, 27 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Hi Alessandra == |
|||
Would you mind giving me a concise statement of what you think is the problem (we can discuss the solution later) is with our curation of controversial images [[User_talk:Anthonyhcole#What_is_the_problem_with_controversial_image_use_on_Wikipedia.3F|here]]? --[[User:Anthonyhcole|Anthonyhcole]] ([[User talk:Anthonyhcole|talk]]) 10:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== inre [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maisie Williams]] == |
|||
I understand where you're coming from, but what we have here is coverage for a singular event... her participation ''[[Game of Thrones (TV series)|Game of Thrones]]''. Despite her push at the GNG, until she has another notable role she fails WP:ENT. And as her sourcability is for just the one thing, this becomes a [[WP:BLP1E]]. I think a merge is the solution. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 03:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== your edits on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Are All Men Pedophiles?]] == |
|||
Hi Allesandra, I think your comments on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Are All Men Pedophiles?]] are needlessly offensive. Uncyclopedia is a website for humor and jokes. When you transwiki an article that was created in good faith, and not intended as a joke, you give me the idea that effectively, whether you intend to or not, you are equating their good faith efforts on Wikipedia with a joke. While I don't know if that was your intention or not, please be a little more considerate to our editors, even if you don't agree with them, and especially when they don't have a lot experience on Wikipedia yet. [[User:Martijn Hoekstra|Martijn Hoekstra]] ([[User talk:Martijn Hoekstra|talk]]) 18:56, 28 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:The article is only humorous because it describes an (apparently) absurd documentary in such a deadpan-serious way. However, since the article was written by {{user|Janwillembreure}}, who appears to be the producer/director/writer/editor of the film, [[Jan-Willem Breure]], I admit that ridiculing the film could be construed as a slight against the author. In the alternative, taking the film, the message apparently conveyed, and the producer's use of Wikipedia to promote these as in earnest, I assure you that I would have far harsher words to say about the entire enterprise. [[User:Alessandra Napolitano|Alessandra Napolitano]] ([[User talk:Alessandra Napolitano#top|talk]]) 19:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::I don't know, I haven't seen the film. Actually, (almost?) nobody has, which is pretty much why I suggested its deletion. [[User:Martijn Hoekstra|Martijn Hoekstra]] ([[User talk:Martijn Hoekstra|talk]]) 19:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Hi. I hope you didn't mind me doing [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Borderline_personality_disorder&action=historysubmit&diff=462227669&oldid=462209533 this], straight after your good edit. I had been meaning to flesh out that section for some time, and your edit reminded me. I don't think I've contradicted you at all, I just think it's an important enough aspect to lavish a bit of space on. I asked [[User: Casliber]] to look it over but he hasn't got to it yet. If you have any thoughts or criticisms about what I wrote, I'd really appreciate hearing them. --[[User:Anthonyhcole|Anthonyhcole]] ([[User talk:Anthonyhcole|talk]]) 12:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:That's fine. Everything we write is probably going to be revised at some point in the future. [[User:Alessandra Napolitano|Alessandra Napolitano]] ([[User talk:Alessandra Napolitano#top|talk]]) 18:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== An expose on fsck in the NYT == |
|||
I'm still chuckling at the thought. If you participate in enough AfDs, you can't help but be struck by how different they can be. In some, you're struggling to explain that, no, the vendor's website really doesn't count as a source. Here we've got someone quibbling that even with ''both'' the WSJ ''and'' the NYT on-board, it still seems dicey. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 03:39, 1 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:55, 17 February 2023
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
Blocked
[edit]Based on behavioural evidence (a keen interest in arbitration and AFDs) and checkuser data, it is apparent that this account is operated by the banned User:John254. I have therefore blocked it indefinitely. AGK [•] 21:57, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper
[edit]
User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 16:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Alessandra Napolitano/Lightning viper, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)