Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerPlay Golf: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:{{la|PowerPlay Golf}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerPlay Golf|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 December 5#{{anchorencode:PowerPlay Golf}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|PowerPlay Golf}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerPlay Golf|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 December 5#{{anchorencode:PowerPlay Golf}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
I don't know much about golf, but I do know that one media mention does not satisfy notability requirements. All of user's contributions seem to be in the interest of promoting this. Perhaps worth noting is the site's banner now includes "Recognized by Wikipedia! <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo< |
I don't know much about golf, but I do know that one media mention does not satisfy notability requirements. All of user's contributions seem to be in the interest of promoting this. Perhaps worth noting is the site's banner now includes "Recognized by Wikipedia! <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color:#D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 23:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Fails to satisfy notability criteria. [[User:Twenty Years|Twenty]] [[User talk:Twenty Years|Years]] 03:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Fails to satisfy notability criteria. [[User:Twenty Years|Twenty]] [[User talk:Twenty Years|Years]] 03:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' I was the admin that removed the speedy tag from this (as well as removing adverty elements). I don't think that their reference to Wikipedia should influence us. I did a quick and dirty Google search and found ([http://www.thegolfvine.co.uk/articles.cfm/article/powerplay-golf-offers-glimpse-of-the-future]) and ([http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A19618941]) both of which seemed pretty third party, especially the latter, written by a well-respected BBC Golf correspondent. Once I'd seen them, I stopped looking. Enhance the article and add balance, perhaps they won't be so happy once we include criticism. Interestingly, the [[Iain Carter]] piece includes the following: "Now if ever you want to get together a bunch of cynical spoilsports then invite a hoard of journalists. If a dampener can be found we'll be the first to locate it. Yet after the initiation of 'Power Play' golf there wasn't a hint of criticism." --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 08:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' I was the admin that removed the speedy tag from this (as well as removing adverty elements). I don't think that their reference to Wikipedia should influence us. I did a quick and dirty Google search and found ([http://www.thegolfvine.co.uk/articles.cfm/article/powerplay-golf-offers-glimpse-of-the-future]) and ([http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A19618941]) both of which seemed pretty third party, especially the latter, written by a well-respected BBC Golf correspondent. Once I'd seen them, I stopped looking. Enhance the article and add balance, perhaps they won't be so happy once we include criticism. Interestingly, the [[Iain Carter]] piece includes the following: "Now if ever you want to get together a bunch of cynical spoilsports then invite a hoard of journalists. If a dampener can be found we'll be the first to locate it. Yet after the initiation of 'Power Play' golf there wasn't a hint of criticism." --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 08:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:*It doesn't need to be ''popular'', it needs to be ''notable'', ie reported on by multiple non trivial RS. I found such references in seconds. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 07:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC) |
:*It doesn't need to be ''popular'', it needs to be ''notable'', ie reported on by multiple non trivial RS. I found such references in seconds. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 07:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. There are enough reliable third party sources to warrant retention of the article. Congratulations to Dweller for his clean up work. [[User:Capitalistroadster|Capitalistroadster]] ([[User talk:Capitalistroadster|talk]]) 07:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. There are enough reliable third party sources to warrant retention of the article. Congratulations to Dweller for his clean up work. [[User:Capitalistroadster|Capitalistroadster]] ([[User talk:Capitalistroadster|talk]]) 07:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. ditto on third party sources. [[User:Sting_au|< |
*'''Keep'''. ditto on third party sources. <b>[[User:Sting_au|<span style="color:green;">Sting_au</span>]] [[User talk:Sting_au|<span style="color:gold;">Talk</span>]]</b> 13:36, 8 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong Keep'''. As per Capitalistroadster.[[User:Sunderland06|Sunderland06]] [[User talk:sunderland06|(talk)]] 14:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Strong Keep'''. As per Capitalistroadster.[[User:Sunderland06|Sunderland06]] [[User talk:sunderland06|(talk)]] 14:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC) |
||