Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Abandon Tank: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
reorder |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
;Articles this image appears in:[[Tank]] |
;Articles this image appears in:[[Tank]] |
||
;Creator:U.S. Army |
;Creator:U.S. Army |
||
;Nominator: < |
;Nominator: <span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype; font-size:medium;">[[User:Why1991/Mystery|<span style="color:green;">¿</span>]][[User:Why1991|<span style="color:red;">Why</span>]][[User talk:Why1991|<span style="color:darkblue;">1</span>]][[User:Why1991/Userboxes|<span style="color:orange;">9</span>]][[User talk:Why1991/Help This Noob|<span style="color:blue;">9</span>]][[User:Why1991/Awards|<span style="color:purple;">1</span>]]</span> <small><sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<i style="color:green;">ESP.</i>]] | [[User:Why1991/Signature's|<i style="color:black;">Sign Here</i>]]</sup></small> |
||
* '''Support''' and nominate — < |
* '''Support''' and nominate — <span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype; font-size:medium;">[[User:Why1991/Mystery|<span style="color:green;">¿</span>]][[User:Why1991|<span style="color:red;">Why</span>]][[User talk:Why1991|<span style="color:darkblue;">1</span>]][[User:Why1991/Userboxes|<span style="color:orange;">9</span>]][[User talk:Why1991/Help This Noob|<span style="color:blue;">9</span>]][[User:Why1991/Awards|<span style="color:purple;">1</span>]]</span> <small><sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<i style="color:green;">ESP.</i>]] | [[User:Why1991/Signature's|<i style="color:black;">Sign Here</i>]]</sup></small> 21:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' Although it can be cleaned up, it is an encyclopedic picture. '''[[User:Sharkface217|<span style="background:black;color:red">S h a r k </span>]][[User talk:Sharkface217|<span style="background:black;color:red">f a c e </span>]][[Special:Contributions/Sharkface217|<span style="background:black;color:red">2 1 7 </span>]]''' 02:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' Although it can be cleaned up, it is an encyclopedic picture. '''[[User:Sharkface217|<span style="background:black;color:red">S h a r k </span>]][[User talk:Sharkface217|<span style="background:black;color:red">f a c e </span>]][[Special:Contributions/Sharkface217|<span style="background:black;color:red">2 1 7 </span>]]''' 02:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong Support'''; image quality doesn't apply significantly in this image as it is black and white...and that's a good thing, mind you. Details are sharp even though it is a two-colour image. In short, there's nothing I can find fault with in this picture. -- [[User:A._Exeunt|< |
*'''Strong Support'''; image quality doesn't apply significantly in this image as it is black and white...and that's a good thing, |
||
mind you. Details are sharp even though it is a two-colour image. In short, there's nothing I can find fault with in this picture. -- [[User:A._Exeunt|<span style="color:DarkGreen; font-family:palatino linotype;">Alt</span>]][[User_talk:A._Exeunt|<span style="color:Green; font-family:antiqua;">iris</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/A._Exeunt|<span style="color:DarkRed; font-family:book antiqua;">Exeunt</span>]] 02:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''oppose''' - image quality regs certainly do apply to b&w images, but I think you mean exceptions can be made if the image is historical, as this one may very well be. That said, it is strongly posterized, which has reduced its effective bit depth. The region around the tree seems to me a flagrant example of distracting blown highlights - a complaint I seldomly lodge about FPCs. [[User:Debivort|Debivort]] 07:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
*'''oppose''' - image quality regs certainly do apply to b&w images, but I think you mean exceptions can be made if the image is historical, as this one may very well be. That said, it is strongly posterized, which has reduced its effective bit depth. The region around the tree seems to me a flagrant example of distracting blown highlights - a complaint I seldomly lodge about FPCs. [[User:Debivort|Debivort]] 07:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''', I'm not sure what this picture is supposed to be telling me. Guys jump off of tanks? [[User:Night Gyr|Night Gyr]] ([[User talk:Night Gyr|talk]]/[[User:Night Gyr/Over|Oy]]) 14:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''', I'm not sure what this picture is supposed to be telling me. Guys jump off of tanks? [[User:Night Gyr|Night Gyr]] ([[User talk:Night Gyr|talk]]/[[User:Night Gyr/Over|Oy]]) 14:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
**The text in the thumbnail pretty much explains it.--<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype; font-size:medium;">[[User:Why1991/Mystery|<span style="color:green;">¿</span>]][[User:Why1991|<span style="color:red;">Why</span>]][[User talk:Why1991|<span style="color:darkblue;">1</span>]][[User:Why1991/Userboxes|<span style="color:orange;">9</span>]][[User talk:Why1991/Help This Noob|<span style="color:blue;">9</span>]][[User:Why1991/Awards|<span style="color:purple;">1</span>]]</span> <small><sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<i style="color:green;">ESP.</i>]] | [[User:Why1991/Signature's|<i style="color:black;">Sign Here</i>]]</sup></small> 21:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
**The text in the thumbnail pretty much explains it. |
|||
***Yes, people abandon tanks by jumping out of them. [[User:Night Gyr|Night Gyr]] ([[User talk:Night Gyr|talk]]/[[User:Night Gyr/Over|Oy]]) 23:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
****FOR TRAINING. How much clearer could I get? If you have a better suggestion please tell.--<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype; font-size:medium;">[[User:Why1991/Mystery|<span style="color:green;">¿</span>]][[User:Why1991|<span style="color:red;">Why</span>]][[User talk:Why1991|<span style="color:darkblue;">1</span>]][[User:Why1991/Userboxes|<span style="color:orange;">9</span>]][[User talk:Why1991/Help This Noob|<span style="color:blue;">9</span>]][[User:Why1991/Awards|<span style="color:purple;">1</span>]]</span> <small><sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<i style="color:green;">ESP.</i>]] | [[User:Why1991/Signature's|<i style="color:black;">Sign Here</i>]]</sup></small> 01:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
[[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] '''Oppose''' Not bad, but seems to me a poor scan of a not overly historic/enc image --[[User:Fir0002|Fir0002]] 01:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose'''. poor quality not outweighted by much (any?) historical significance. There are literally thousands of pictures like this available via LOC, this one isn't really outstanding. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] 15:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose'''. First of all the picture just looks weird. Something just seems wrong with the upper right person. But the main problem is: who does this expand your knowledge of tanks? I have to say it doesn't. The image is of quite high quality for its age, but I believe it should be removed from the article (as redundant and having nothing to do with its location) before being featured. Though it could fit well, unfeatured, in M3 Lee. [[User:Say1988|say1988]] 04:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
{{FPCresult|Not promoted|}} [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 12:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 27 February 2023
- Reason
- Can't resist an old military photo like this.
- Articles this image appears in
- Tank
- Creator
- U.S. Army
- Nominator
- ¿Why1991 ESP. | Sign Here
- Support and nominate — ¿Why1991 ESP. | Sign Here 21:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Although it can be cleaned up, it is an encyclopedic picture. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 02:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Support; image quality doesn't apply significantly in this image as it is black and white...and that's a good thing,
mind you. Details are sharp even though it is a two-colour image. In short, there's nothing I can find fault with in this picture. -- Altiris Exeunt 02:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- oppose - image quality regs certainly do apply to b&w images, but I think you mean exceptions can be made if the image is historical, as this one may very well be. That said, it is strongly posterized, which has reduced its effective bit depth. The region around the tree seems to me a flagrant example of distracting blown highlights - a complaint I seldomly lodge about FPCs. Debivort 07:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, I'm not sure what this picture is supposed to be telling me. Guys jump off of tanks? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 14:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Oppose Not bad, but seems to me a poor scan of a not overly historic/enc image --Fir0002 01:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. poor quality not outweighted by much (any?) historical significance. There are literally thousands of pictures like this available via LOC, this one isn't really outstanding. --Dschwen 15:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. First of all the picture just looks weird. Something just seems wrong with the upper right person. But the main problem is: who does this expand your knowledge of tanks? I have to say it doesn't. The image is of quite high quality for its age, but I believe it should be removed from the article (as redundant and having nothing to do with its location) before being featured. Though it could fit well, unfeatured, in M3 Lee. say1988 04:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 12:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)