Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Charles Denomy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was delete |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Ks0stm|< |
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Ks0stm|<span style="color:#009900;">'''Ks0stm'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Ks0stm|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Ks0stm|C]]•[[User:Ks0stm/Guestbook|G]]•[[User:Ks0stm/Email|E]])</sup> 19:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
===[[Bernard Charles Denomy]]=== |
===[[Bernard Charles Denomy]]=== |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[David Ernest Hornell]] received a VC for that action and therefore merits an article. A DSO isn't enough. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 20:06, 11 September 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[David Ernest Hornell]] received a VC for that action and therefore merits an article. A DSO isn't enough. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 20:06, 11 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Ontario|list of Ontario-related deletion discussions]]. — <span style="border:1px solid blue;">[[User:Ascii002|< |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Ontario|list of Ontario-related deletion discussions]]. — <span style="border:1px solid blue;">[[User:Ascii002|<span style="background:blue; color:white;">'''Ascii002'''</span>]][[User talk:Ascii002|'''Talk''']] [[Special:Contributions/Ascii002|'''Contribs''']] [[User:Ascii002/Guestbook|'''GuestBook''']]</span> 00:34, 12 September 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. — <span style="border:1px solid blue;">[[User:Ascii002|< |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. — <span style="border:1px solid blue;">[[User:Ascii002|<span style="background:blue; color:white;">'''Ascii002'''</span>]][[User talk:Ascii002|'''Talk''']] [[Special:Contributions/Ascii002|'''Contribs''']] [[User:Ascii002/Guestbook|'''GuestBook''']]</span> 00:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Military|list of Military-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Military|list of Military-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete'''. Junior officer with a second-level decoration. Not enough. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 09:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Junior officer with a second-level decoration. Not enough. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 09:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Not enough [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] in independent reliable sources to show notability.-- [[User:danntm|danntm]] <sup>[[user talk:danntm|T]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Danntm|C]]</sub> 05:28, 18 September 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Not enough [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] in independent reliable sources to show notability.-- [[User:danntm|danntm]] <sup>[[user talk:danntm|T]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Danntm|C]]</sub> 05:28, 18 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
||
Latest revision as of 22:44, 28 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 19:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Bernard Charles Denomy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Biography fails WP:SOLDIER, while heroic the subject only appears to be notable for a single award of the DSO. Nthep (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. David Ernest Hornell received a VC for that action and therefore merits an article. A DSO isn't enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:06, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:34, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Junior officer with a second-level decoration. Not enough. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough significant coverage in independent reliable sources to show notability.-- danntm T C 05:28, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.