Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clipping path service: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 23:45, 28 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Clipping path. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clipping path service

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially spam, by a promoter of a company that supplies such a service. Unsourced, and apparently nonnotable as a concept. Dicklyon (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect article to Clipping path; not sure there's anything else in the article worth preserving. --Jayron32 06:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Jayron32 - Dwayne was here! ♫ 06:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per saiful_9999 - There was no clear indication in the article that the article contents are bearing to promote a company promotion

If unfortunately, any information is or are related to show a company promotion, please delete this information in the article. As the new comer writer I have no any company promotion intention in the article -saiful_9999 Most probably Clipping Path Specialist and Clipping Path India references are making problem as a spam article. So I have deleted the links from External Link.

saiful_9999-Exist article “Clipping path” in the wikipedia is basically provided us definition type information on clipping path. On the other hand, the article “Clipping path service” is necessary in the wikipedia to know about the importance of clipping path service in the digital world and the exit article of clipping path service is written by informative information. So, in my view, the article should not be considered for deletion. The article can be edited or improved instant of deletion. I think this will be wise decision. —Preceding undated comment added 04:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC).

redirect as per others. Although not promoting any one firm it's written like advertising copy, and although this could be fixed the entire topic is non-notable, much as "car washing sevice" or "shoe repair service" would be. No need for an article.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:16, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'm not sure the concept per se is unnotable. Given the high number of companies providing such services and the fact that it is not obvious that companies are outsourcing such services, I tend to think there can be said something about it within an article like that. Please note that the clipping path article does not address this aspect, so if you're suggesting a redirect the fact that there are services providing this needs to be mentioned in that article (probably best as a single concise(!) section). Of course, the current state of this article is unacceptable, full of broken verbiage and original research. Nageh (talk) 15:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''redirect to [[Clipping path]]'''. ([[Wikipedia:non-admin closure|non-admin closure]]) [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 ===[[Clipping path service]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
 :{{la|Clipping path service}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clipping path service|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 August 19#{{anchorencode:Clipping path service}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clipping path service}}|2=AfD statistics}})
 :({{Find sources|Clipping path service}})
 Essentially spam, by a promoter of a company that supplies such a service.  Unsourced, and apparently nonnotable as a  concept.  [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 06:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
-*'''Redirect''' article to [[Clipping path]]; not sure there's anything else in the article worth preserving.  --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 06:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Redirect''' article to [[Clipping path]]; not sure there's anything else in the article worth preserving.  --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#000099;">Jayron</span>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009900;">32</span>]]''''' 06:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
-*'''Redirect''' per [[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]] - [[User:Dwayne|<span style="cursor;"><font face="Century Gothic" color="#2B65EC" size="2">'''Dwayne'''</font></span>]] <small>was here!</small>  [[User talk:Dwayne|<span style="color: green;">&#9835;</span>]] 06:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Redirect''' per [[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]] - [[User:Dwayne|<span style="cursor;"><span style="font-family:Century Gothic; color:#2B65EC; font-size:small;">'''Dwayne'''</span></span>]] <small>was here!</small>  [[User talk:Dwayne|<span style="color: green;">&#9835;</span>]] 06:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Redirect''' per [[User:saiful_9999|saiful_9999]] - There was no clear indication in the article that the article contents are bearing to promote a company promotion
 If unfortunately, any information is or are related to show a company promotion, please delete this information in the article. As the new comer writer I have no any company promotion intention in the article -[[User:saiful_9999|saiful_9999]]
@@ Line 15: / Line 21: @@
 *'''Comment'''. I'm not sure the concept per se is unnotable. Given the high number of companies providing such services and the fact that it is not obvious that companies are outsourcing such services, I tend to think there can be said something about it within an article like that. Please note that the [[clipping path]] article does not address this aspect, so if you're suggesting a redirect the fact that there are services providing this needs to be mentioned in that article (probably best as a single concise(!) section). Of course, the current state of this article is unacceptable, full of broken verbiage and original research. [[User:Nageh|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh|talk]]) 15:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>