Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natacha Merritt: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(24 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''keep'''. ([[Wikipedia:non-admin closure|non-admin closure]]) [[User:Tim Song|Tim Song]] ([[User talk:Tim Song|talk]]) 22:20, 19 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Natacha Merritt]]=== |
===[[Natacha Merritt]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
:{{la|Natacha Merritt}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natacha Merritt|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 November |
:{{la|Natacha Merritt}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natacha Merritt|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 November 13#{{anchorencode:Natacha Merritt}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
:({{findsources|Natacha Merritt}}) |
:({{findsources|Natacha Merritt}}) |
||
Not notable [[User:Rhomb|Rhomb]] ([[User talk:Rhomb|talk]]) 07:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
Not notable [[User:Rhomb|Rhomb]] ([[User talk:Rhomb|talk]]) 07:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
Line 14: | Line 20: | ||
:::# The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, or had works in many significant libraries. |
:::# The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, or had works in many significant libraries. |
||
::Which of these do you think this person has met? [[User:Rhomb|Rhomb]] ([[User talk:Rhomb|talk]]) 21:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
::Which of these do you think this person has met? [[User:Rhomb|Rhomb]] ([[User talk:Rhomb|talk]]) 21:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::"A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published[3] secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent,[4] and independent of the subject." [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 21:45, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
:::"A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published[3] secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent,[4] and independent of the subject." [[WP:CREATIVE]] is part of [[WP:BIO]]. She meets [[WP:BIO#Basic criteria]]. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 21:45, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
::::"Presumed" perhaps -- presumptions are rebuttable. Since "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability", I claim that mere sensationalism over her work is trivial, and that this is supported by the fact that the failure to meet the criteria I quoted above supports that assessment. [[User:Rhomb|Rhomb]] ([[User talk:Rhomb|talk]]) 22:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Per years of community consensus, the links show notability and this article will be kept for sure. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 22:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' Like Joe Chill, I'm not a fan of her work and I wouldn't give her the time of day. But that's neither here nor there -- other people have, as the sources listed in the article and by Joe Chill clearly show. (Also, a number of other sources are behind pay walls.) She meets [[WP:BIO]], and saying that the sources are trivial sounds a bit like [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT]]. As to the claim that the book isn't notable, [[Wikipedia:Notability (books)]] says a book is notable if "the book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself, with at least some of these works serving a general audience." The book has been reviewed in ''The New York Times'', ''The Los Angeles Times'', and ''The Guardian'', among others.--[[User:Fabrictramp|<span style="color:#228b22; font-family:comic sans ms;">Fabrictramp</span>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<span style="color:#960018; font-family:Papyrus;">talk to me</span>]] 16:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
<hr style="width:50%;" /> |
|||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <strong>[[user:Pmlinediter|<span style="color:Orange">'''Pmlineditor'''</span>]]</strong> <big><big><big>[[user talk:Pmlinediter|<span style="color:#50C878">'''∞'''</span>]]</big></big></big> 11:08, 13 November 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
|||
* <small>'''Note:''' This article has been nominated for [[Wikipedia:Article_Rescue_Squadron|rescue]]. <span style="font-family:Century Gothic;">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</span> 12:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
* '''Comment'''. I'm puzzled that anyone should bother to !vote "keep" when they would both rather see the article not here? [[User:Rhomb|Rhomb]] ([[User talk:Rhomb|talk]]) 22:18, 13 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
**Because she passes [[WP:BIO]]. Voting delete by our personal opinions won't get it deleted. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 22:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep.''' The [[WP:RS]]'s provided by Joe Chill have been incorporated into the article. It still needs to be expanded but the groundwork has been laid. She is clearly [[WP:N]]. <span style="font-family:Century Gothic;">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</span> 01:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' - Not much to add to Joe Chill and Fabrictramp. They've really covered everything. [[User:Spongefrog|<span style="color:Green; font-family:High Tower Text;">'''Lord Spongefrog'''</span>]][[User:Spongefrog/Subpage/My Barnstars|,]] [[User talk:Spongefrog#top|<span style="color:blue; font-family:High Tower Text;">(Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!)</span>]] 18:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' - Obvious notability. Specific contribution to her art form. Addressed in mainstream news media. [[User:Hektor|Hektor]] ([[User talk:Hektor|talk]]) 08:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::That's [[WP:V|verifiability]], not [[WP:CREATIVE|notability]]. [[User:Rhomb|Rhomb]] ([[User talk:Rhomb|talk]]) 12:46, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::The link you give for notability ([[WP:CREATIVE]]) lists "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." That seems to be exactly what Hektor is saying.--[[User:Fabrictramp|<span style="color:#228b22; font-family:comic sans ms;">Fabrictramp</span>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<span style="color:#960018; font-family:Papyrus;">talk to me</span>]] 17:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' I read the Salon article [http://archive.salon.com/health/sex/urge/2000/05/06/digital/index.html], and she is clearly notable. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 14:26, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |