Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Silivrenion: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata rfa" style="background-color: #fff5f5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[wikipedia:requests for adminship|request for adminship]] that '''did not succeed'''. <strong style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</strong>[[Category:Unsuccessful requests for adminship|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
|||
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Silivrenion|Silivrenion]]=== |
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Silivrenion|Silivrenion]]=== |
||
'''Final (0/2/0); ended 02:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC) - '''[[User:Soap|<span style="color:green;">—</span>]][[User talk:Soap|<span style="color:#057602;">''Soap''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<span style="color:green;">—</span>]]''' 02:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)''' <!-- Template:finaltally --> originally scheduled to end 02:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC) '''[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Silivrenion&diff=414182468&oldid=414181894 Withdrawn by user]''' |
|||
<span class="plainlinks">'''[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Silivrenion|action=edit§ion=5}} <font color="#002BB8">Voice your opinion on this candidate</font>]'''</span> ([[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Silivrenion|talk page]]) |
|||
'''{{rfatally|Silivrenion}}<!-- WHEN CLOSING THIS RFA, REPLACE THIS PART WITH {{subst:finaltally|SUPPORTVOTES|OPPOSEVOTES|NEUTRALVOTES|[OPTIONALMESSAGE] OR [result=successful] OR [reason=SNOW] OR [reason=NOTNOW] OR (blank)}} SEE TEMPLATE FOR MORE DETAILS -->; Scheduled to end 02:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)''' |
|||
====Nomination==== |
====Nomination==== |
||
Line 40: | Line 42: | ||
=====Oppose===== |
=====Oppose===== |
||
#Oppose, but with moral support. I think 700 manual edits and 40 edits to WP: space just doesn't demonstrate the depth and breadth of activity I want to see from an administrator candidate. You're on the right track, though, and I like your enthusiasm and the fact that you have created (and referenced!) articles. I hope to see you back here again with a little more experience. [[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) 02:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
#Oppose, but with moral support. I think 700 manual edits and 40 edits to WP: space just doesn't demonstrate the depth and breadth of activity I want to see from an administrator candidate. You're on the right track, though, and I like your enthusiasm and the fact that you have created (and referenced!) articles. I hope to see you back here again with a little more experience. [[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) 02:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
#I agree. I appreciate your willingness to spend time here, but adminship is not something you can gain so quickly. You have less than 3000 edits, and most of those were made with tools such as Huggle and Twinkle. Most administrators have a much higher edit count than that and have been editing for several years before they put themselves forward for an RfA. This is not meant to discourage you. There are many examples of editors who became administrators less than a year after they first registered. But they are in every case among the most hard working and stable editors we have, whereas your editing history suggests a lot of stops and starts. '''[[User:Soap|< |
#I agree. I appreciate your willingness to spend time here, but adminship is not something you can gain so quickly. You have less than 3000 edits, and most of those were made with tools such as Huggle and Twinkle. Most administrators have a much higher edit count than that and have been editing for several years before they put themselves forward for an RfA. This is not meant to discourage you. There are many examples of editors who became administrators less than a year after they first registered. But they are in every case among the most hard working and stable editors we have, whereas your editing history suggests a lot of stops and starts. '''[[User:Soap|<span style="color:green;">—</span>]][[User talk:Soap|<span style="color:#057602;">''Soap''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<span style="color:green;">—</span>]]''' 02:44, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
=====Neutral===== |
=====Neutral===== |
||
# |
# |
||
<!-- Please do not submit comments before the RfA starts. Feel free to remove this notice once the RfA has been transcluded. --> |
<!-- Please do not submit comments before the RfA starts. Feel free to remove this notice once the RfA has been transcluded. --> |
||
:''The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either [[{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|this nomination]] or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> |