User talk:WilliamH: Difference between revisions
→Dave Benson Phillips: Thanks. |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(36 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retired}} |
|||
{{User talk:WilliamH/Header}} |
|||
{{bots|deny=Theo's Little Bot}} |
|||
== A beer for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Export hell seidel steiner.png|70px]] |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Belated thanks for your work on the Morning277 SPI. —[[User_talk:Rybec|<span style="color:black;"><span style="background:#ccccff">rybec</span></span>]] 07:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
:I have to agree, thanks for everything. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 07:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you for the hard work and dedication you've shown to the Wikipedia community. Sad to see you go. —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 08:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::I too was stunned to see this, and am sad to see you go. Hope all is well with you and that this won't be the last time we meet. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">[[User:Steven Zhang|<span style="color:#078330;">Steven</span>]] [[User talk:Steven Zhang|<span style="color:#2875b0;">Zhang</span>]] <sup>[[WP:DRN|<span style="color:#d67f0f;">Help resolve disputes!</span>]]</sup></span> 12:47, 1 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*I've known this day was coming for some time now, and I certainly understand why. Thanks for the tremendous amount of support and assistance you've given me over the last year. Don't be a stranger off-wiki. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] | [[User talk:Dennis Brown|2¢]] | [[WP:WikiProject Editor Retention|<small>WER</small>]] 15:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Seriously? Yet another loss to the project.—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Chat]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 15:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
**Sorry to see you go :< '''[[User:Addshore|<span style="color:black">·addshore·</span>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Addshore|<span style="color:black;">talk to me!</span>]]</sup> 09:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*I've known you for a long time and you have been an all round great editor. Thanks for all your hard work and hope to see you someday back on Wikipedia. Goodbye. ~''[[User:TheGeneralUser|<span style="color:DeepPink;">TheGeneralUser</span>]] [[User talk:TheGeneralUser|<span style="color:DeepPink;">(talk)</span>]]'' 17:46, 2 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Thank you for what you have done. You've been a tremendous asset to the community and will be missed. ''[[User:NativeForeigner|NativeForeigner]]'' <sup>[[User talk:NativeForeigner|Talk]]</sup> 02:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*I haven't known you for very long, but you seemed like me to be a good administrator and checkuser, as well as an all-around nice guy, and I'm sorry to see you go. I understand, however, that there may be real-life reasons for your retirement that I don't know of. — <span style="border:1px solid #00007f;background:#07ffff"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[User:SamX|SamX]]‧[[User talk:SamX|☎]]‧[[Special:Contributions/SamX|✎]]‧</span><span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting;">[[User:SamX/Guestbook|S]]</span></span> 14:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*Thank you for all the tremendous work you did here. You became one of the most exemplary Wikipedians and this is a very big loss to the project. I wish you the best of luck in your future endeavours. Cheers! — [[User:Hahc21|<span style="color:#333333;">'''ΛΧΣ'''</span>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<span style="color:#336699;">'''<sup>21</sup>'''</span>]] 01:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Files missing description details == |
== Files missing description details == |
||
Line 8: | Line 27: | ||
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers. |
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers. |
||
If you have any questions, please see [[Help:Image page#Description of the image|Help:Image page]]. Thank you. ''Message delivered by [[User:Theo's Little Bot|Theo's Little Bot]] ([[User:Theo's Little Bot/opt-out|opt-out]])'' 15: |
If you have any questions, please see [[Help:Image page#Description of the image|Help:Image page]]. Thank you. ''Message delivered by [[User:Theo's Little Bot|Theo's Little Bot]] ([[User:Theo's Little Bot/opt-out|opt-out]])'' 15:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC) </div><!-- Template:Add-desc-l --> |
||
== Unblocked [[Queens Library]] IP == |
|||
I've unblocked, at least for now, {{user|207.159.196.253}}, which is used by staff and patrons at the [[Queens Library]]. They're having a wiki-workshop training session tomorrow (requiring several new accounts to be registered), and besides that there have not been any bad edits from that IP recently.--[[User:Pharos|Pharos]] ([[User talk:Pharos|talk]]) 01:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Hi Pharos. As WilliamH has retired, I'll take the liberty of responding. Since the abusive user has returned to that location a number of times to register and use sockpuppets, please let me know when the workshop has wrapped up so that the IP can be reblocked. I don't like blocking public library IPs like this, but sometimes we don't have a lot of choices. Thanks —[[User:DoRD|DoRD]] ([[User talk:DoRD|talk]]) 03:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== 24.19.234.62 == |
|||
Can some talk page watcher identify the sockmaster for 24.19.234.62? The same user has returned to trolling & harassment as 50.174.76.70 and was blocked again. Looks like a [[WP:LTA]] case already. [[User:Someone not using his real name|Someone not using his real name]] ([[User talk:Someone not using his real name|talk]]) 03:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Merry Christmas from Cyberpower678 == |
|||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[image:Christmas_tree_sxc_hu.jpg|70px|left]] |
|||
—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyber<span style="color:red">power]] <sub style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub>[[User talk:C678|<sup style="margin-left:-6.1ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Merry Christmas]] is wishing you a [[Mary Poppins|Merry]] [[Christmas]]! This greeting (and season) promotes [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a [[Christmas|Merry Christmas]], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! <br /> |
|||
''Spread the cheer by adding {{tls|Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.'' |
|||
</div>—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyber<span style="color:red">power]] <sub style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub>[[User talk:C678|<sup style="margin-left:-6.1ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Merry Christmas]] 22:49, 24 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Happy 2014 from Cyberpower678 == |
|||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:gold; background-color:white; font color:gray; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[image:Fireworks_in_Jaén.jpg|225px|left]] |
|||
—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] <sub style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub>[[User talk:C678|<sup style="margin-left:-6.1ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Happy 2014]] — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! <br /> |
|||
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{tls|New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
|||
</div>—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] <sub style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub>[[User talk:C678|<sup style="margin-left:-6.1ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Happy 2014]] 00:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Sock-puppet investigation == |
|||
== Implementation of [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements]] == |
|||
I neither created nor ordered the user who apparently now has the username Tiburon89 to edit that page. We are merely sharing an IP for a couple of days and he/she was unfamiliar with Wikipedia's editing policy. We'll both have completely different IP addresses in a couple of days. [[User:Astrohoundy|Astrohoundy]] ([[User talk:Astrohoundy|talk]]) 14:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
You are receiving this message because you are listed at [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Former bureaucrats]]. Writ Keeper pointed out that these users were not directly notified of the [[Special:Permalink/676107626|community discussion]] ending August 2015, where consensus was reached to [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements|remove the bureaucrat permissions of users who have not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years]]. |
|||
== kauffner SPI == |
|||
As of 1 October 2015, any former bureaucrat who has not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years that wishes their bureaucrat permissions restored will need to request reinstatement at RFB. |
|||
I see you did CU on kauffner, but as this user has had many socks, and many sleepers, did you do a sleeper check as requested by both the nominator, and the clerk? [[User:Gaijin42|Gaijin42]] ([[User talk:Gaijin42|talk]]) 13:48, 23 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*I did not see any other accounts between which I could draw a connection to Kauffner, no. [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH#top|talk]]) 11:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
If you intend to return to bureaucrat activity, please request [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Restoration of permissions|restoration of permissions]] before 1 October 2015 or three years passes since your last bureaucrat activity, whichever is later. |
|||
== An Award == |
|||
{{cquote|Bureaucrats are expected to exercise the duties granted by their role while remaining cognizant of relevant community standards concerning their tasks. In addition to the "[[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Inactive bureaucrat accounts|Inactive bureaucrat accounts]]" requirements, if a bureaucrat does not participate in bureaucrat activity<ref>Bureaucrat activity is widely construed and includes acting or commenting as a bureaucrat at any venue including WP:BN/RFA/RFB/RFBAG/BRFA and responding to requests in their capacity as a [[meta:global renamer|global renamer]] or subscriber to the bureaucrats' mailing list or signalling that they remain actively engaged and available for bureacrat tasks.</ref> for over three years, their bureaucrat permissions may be removed. The user must be notified on their talk page and by email one month before the removal, and again and a few days prior to the removal. If the user does not return to bureaucrat activity, another bureaucrat may request the removal of permissions at [[meta:Steward requests/Permissions]]. Permissions removed for not meeting bureaucrat activity requirements may be re-obtained through a new request for bureaucratship. |
|||
{{award2|image=Stuffed tiger wearing a sombrero.jpg|border=blue|borderwidth=3px|size=180px|topic='''Whack-a-Mole Stuffed Tiger Prize'''|text=Awarded to [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] for your extraordinary efforts to protect Wikipedia during the [[WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/Morning277/Archive|Morning 277 Sockpuppet investigation]]. The ''Whack-a-Mole Stuffed Tiger Prize'' goes to sysops who tirelessly block returning sockpuppets at Carnival Wikipedia. [[User:Doctree|DocTree]] ([[User talk:Doctree|ʞlɐʇ]]·[[Special:Contributions/Doctree|cont]]) [[WP:WER|Join WER]] 00:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
<small>(First awarded by [[User:Durova|Durova]] in July 2007)</small>}} |
|||
}} |
|||
:Thank you very much indeed, Doctree. I'm extremely glad to hear that my efforts have not gone unrecognised. [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH#top|talk]]) 11:53, 26 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
To assist with the implementation of this requirement, please see [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrat activity]]. Modeled after [[Wikipedia:Inactive administrators]] and similar to that process, the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrat activity/2015|log page]] will be created on 1 September 2015. Bureaucrats who have not met the activity requirements as of that date will be notified by email (where possible) and on their talk page to advise of the pending removal. |
|||
== [[user:Sravsandbobby|Sravsandbobby]] == |
|||
If the notified user does not return to bureaucrat activity and the permissions are removed, they will need to request reinstatement at [[WP:RFB]]. Removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon the affected user in any way. |
|||
You have blocked this editor as being a sock of [[user:Morning227|Morning227]]. I cannot find this user; [[user:Morning277|Morning277]] exists and is a prolific sockpuppeteer, but the user you have blocked is not on the list of confirmed (or suspected) socks. Could you please clarify the situation, as he has appealed the block.--<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony Bradbury|'''Anthony Bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 19:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Obviously that was a typo. Either way the request has since been declined, and there would be other SPI-related reasons to decline a future unblock request too. [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH#top|talk]]) 11:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::I was not attempting to argue on behalf of the blocked user; just trying to clarify as his name did not appear, as I said, on the list of [[user:morning277|Morning277's]] confirmed socks. --<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony Bradbury|'''Anthony Bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 21:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. –[[User:xeno|<b style="font-family:verdana;color:#000">xeno</b>]][[user talk:xeno|<sup style="color:#000">talk</sup>]] 20:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Morning227 Sockpuppet issue == |
|||
*Please note that any potential restoration of permissions is also subject to [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Inactive bureaucrat accounts]]: a former bureaucrat who has been completely inactive for three years would need to seek reinstatement at [[WP:RFB]] notwithstanding the above. –[[User:xeno|<b style="font-family:verdana;color:#000">xeno</b>]][[user talk:xeno|<sup style="color:#000">talk</sup>]] 12:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC) |
|||
I've been included in this somehow through no fault of my own. I've been using Wikipedia for more than seven years without any shenanigans of any kind. However, recent attempts to access Wikipedia through my account on my new tablet have resulted in messages that I've been blocked. I'm not sure why either has happened, but now that the SPI is evidently resolved, I'd appreciate having my username removed from any association with it. Thank you.'''[[User:PacificBoy|<font color="SkyBlue">Pac</font><font color="LightPink">if</font><font color="Orchid">ic</font><font color="MediumOrchid">Bo</font><font color="Indigo">y</font>]]''' 19:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
*Your name is not involved in the SPI case at all - it does not appear there. You just got caught up in a hard rangeblock meant for someone else. From the CheckUser side of things, it looks like it's been resolved now, but if it happens again, file a request for IP block exemption on your talk page. [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH#top|talk]]) 22:18, 27 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:*Two of the networks that were blocked belong to Amazon. It may be that his tablet is an Amazon Kindle, and that it's connecting through Amazon's network. If that's what's happening, it may affect a fair number of other editors. —[[User_talk:Rybec|<font color="black"><span style="background:#ccccff">rybec</span></font>]] 22:25, 28 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::That may very well be case, however it would be pretty much the only collateral I saw. Kindle users must make up a fraction of editors; I imagine the abusers simply found a way to join the network for their own ends with different devices. [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH#top|talk]]) 23:01, 28 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::*I had noticed abuse coming from [[Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud|Amazon EC2]]/[[Amazon Web Services|AWS]] addresses within the ranges you blocked. It's a hosting service that can be rented by the hour; no special device is needed, just an SSH or RDP client and some knowledge of Linux, FreeBSD or Windows. —[[User_talk:Rybec|<font color="black"><span style="background:#ccccff">rybec</span></font>]] 04:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::*Perhaps changing the reason to {{tl|webhostblock}} would be more appropriate? This way innocent users will get a message informing them that their method of accessing Wikipedia is not acceptable, rather than being accused of sockpuppetry. -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|<font color="red">♥</font>]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|<font color="red">♦</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|<font color="black">♣</font>]] ♠ 06:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Done. Seems like a reasonable compromise, and the real reason for blocking is already on record in the block log anyway, so that's fine. [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH#top|talk]]) 18:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Streamboxmarketing/Archive]] == |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> |
|||
== Proposed deletion of Milo Yiannopoulos == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[Milo Yiannopoulos]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
Hi! Would you mind taking another look at this? I think you may have misread the request. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 21:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Not notable person.''' |
|||
*{{done}}, cheers. [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH#top|talk]]) 22:19, 27 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
== Dave Benson Phillips == |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Kabahaly|Kabahaly]] ([[User talk:Kabahaly|talk]]) 10:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC) |
|||
I'd like to ask you to reconsider the protection of this article. The only reason is because pending changes level 2, which is the option you chose, has been explicitly rejected by the community. Only pending changes level 1 is currently authorized by the community. See [[Wikipedia_talk:Pending_changes#PC2_In_use_Followup|here]] for a curent discussion of this and several other PC2 protections. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 21:29, 4 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Just to clarify Beeblebrox's statement, PC2 may be accepted by the community at some point but the consensus is that people don't want to consider giving it the go ahead until there is a draft policy outlining appropriate uses of the protection. Such a draft policy doesn't exist at the moment. I am hopeful that we can come up with a draft if we put our heads together now, although others may think it is too soon. [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 09:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks for asking. The individual concerned has been subjected to a lengthy and serious online campaign involving death hoaxes and bad faith rumours, which had a detrimental affect to his career. If consensus would still opt for PC level 1, then I don't mind, but PC level 2 was the obvious and [[WP:IAR|IAR-ish]] way to stop any further manifestation of this problem from happening again on Wikipedia (as it has done in the past) - raising the bar to keep above this sort of thing while still allowing good faith edits. It would be good if that policy were drafted sooner rather than later, as clearly there is remit for PC level 2, as at least one other PC level 2 protected page mentioned on that page indicates. [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH#top|talk]]) 16:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thank you for the explanation. This sounds like a good candidate for PC2 (assuming that campaign included the creation of autoconfirmed accounts). I'm going on holiday soon with questionable internet access but when I get back I might try to knock a draft policy together. |
|||
:::It is interesting that you don't mention the possibility of semi or full protection. Why do you think these are not appropriate? (I'm not trying to be a dick about this. This is the sort of thing that might help us draft a policy.) |
|||
:::[[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 16:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::Yep, no doubt autoconfirmed accounts were involved on at least one occasion. There's an additional complication with such an incident, in that people can spread the rumour/hoax ''even in good faith'' - they simply believe they are reporting accepted facts. I did not consider semi-protection because of the seriousness of the issue, bearing in mind we tend to give BLP concerns a stricter threshold. |
|||
::::::Probably the best outlook is that I was trying to strike the balance between: |
|||
:::::#solving a problem that I felt needed a guaranteed solution - which semi-protection doesn't offer - while |
|||
:::::#still allowing good faith edits - which full protection doesn't allow. --[[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH#top|talk]]) 22:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::I see. Thanks. |
|||
:::::::This is obviously a case where some people would argue for full protection, but others would disagree, depending on how hard-core they are about BLP violations. The article is also has a lowish edit rate. This makes perfect sense as a reason for PC2 protection. |
|||
:::::::[[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 12:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== File:Anton Lechner.jpg listed for discussion == |
|||
== Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thomasfan5034 I amended == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Anton Lechner.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 November 23#File:Anton Lechner.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> [[User:Jarekt|Jarekt]] ([[User talk:Jarekt|talk]]) 15:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC) --[[User:Jarekt|Jarekt]] ([[User talk:Jarekt|talk]]) 15:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
==Orphaned non-free image File:ICRC letter - traceable deaths only.jpg== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:ICRC letter - traceable deaths only.jpg]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]). |
|||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 17:35, 6 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
I amended this case that someone else opened to ask for a checkuser due to possible block ekvasion can you take a look? [[User:Hell in a Bucket|Hell In A Bucket]] ([[User talk:Hell in a Bucket|talk]]) 17:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:No, sorry. All of the accounts bar the most recent one are {{staleip}}. There is nothing for CheckUser to do. [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH#top|talk]]) 22:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:14, 3 March 2023
A beer for you!
[edit]Belated thanks for your work on the Morning277 SPI. —rybec 07:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC) |
- I have to agree, thanks for everything. --Rschen7754 07:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the hard work and dedication you've shown to the Wikipedia community. Sad to see you go. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- I too was stunned to see this, and am sad to see you go. Hope all is well with you and that this won't be the last time we meet. Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 12:47, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've known this day was coming for some time now, and I certainly understand why. Thanks for the tremendous amount of support and assistance you've given me over the last year. Don't be a stranger off-wiki. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 15:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- Seriously? Yet another loss to the project.—cyberpower ChatOnline 15:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to see you go :< ·addshore· talk to me! 09:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've known you for a long time and you have been an all round great editor. Thanks for all your hard work and hope to see you someday back on Wikipedia. Goodbye. ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for what you have done. You've been a tremendous asset to the community and will be missed. NativeForeigner Talk 02:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- I haven't known you for very long, but you seemed like me to be a good administrator and checkuser, as well as an all-around nice guy, and I'm sorry to see you go. I understand, however, that there may be real-life reasons for your retirement that I don't know of. — SamX‧☎‧✎‧S 14:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for all the tremendous work you did here. You became one of the most exemplary Wikipedians and this is a very big loss to the project. I wish you the best of luck in your future endeavours. Cheers! — ΛΧΣ21 01:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
[edit]- File:Austrian Nazis and observers watching Jews scrub the pavement.jpg
- File:Germans walk by a Jewish business destroyed on Kristallnacht.jpg
- File:Jewish refugees aboard the SS St. Louis in Cuba.jpg
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Unblocked Queens Library IP
[edit]I've unblocked, at least for now, 207.159.196.253 (talk · contribs), which is used by staff and patrons at the Queens Library. They're having a wiki-workshop training session tomorrow (requiring several new accounts to be registered), and besides that there have not been any bad edits from that IP recently.--Pharos (talk) 01:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Pharos. As WilliamH has retired, I'll take the liberty of responding. Since the abusive user has returned to that location a number of times to register and use sockpuppets, please let me know when the workshop has wrapped up so that the IP can be reblocked. I don't like blocking public library IPs like this, but sometimes we don't have a lot of choices. Thanks —DoRD (talk) 03:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
24.19.234.62
[edit]Can some talk page watcher identify the sockmaster for 24.19.234.62? The same user has returned to trolling & harassment as 50.174.76.70 and was blocked again. Looks like a WP:LTA case already. Someone not using his real name (talk) 03:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Merry Christmas from Cyberpower678
[edit]
—cyberpower OnlineMerry Christmas is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
—cyberpower OnlineMerry Christmas 22:49, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Happy 2014 from Cyberpower678
[edit]
—cyberpower OnlineHappy 2014 — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
—cyberpower OnlineHappy 2014 00:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Implementation of Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements
[edit]You are receiving this message because you are listed at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Former bureaucrats. Writ Keeper pointed out that these users were not directly notified of the community discussion ending August 2015, where consensus was reached to remove the bureaucrat permissions of users who have not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years.
As of 1 October 2015, any former bureaucrat who has not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years that wishes their bureaucrat permissions restored will need to request reinstatement at RFB.
If you intend to return to bureaucrat activity, please request restoration of permissions before 1 October 2015 or three years passes since your last bureaucrat activity, whichever is later.
“ | Bureaucrats are expected to exercise the duties granted by their role while remaining cognizant of relevant community standards concerning their tasks. In addition to the "Inactive bureaucrat accounts" requirements, if a bureaucrat does not participate in bureaucrat activity[1] for over three years, their bureaucrat permissions may be removed. The user must be notified on their talk page and by email one month before the removal, and again and a few days prior to the removal. If the user does not return to bureaucrat activity, another bureaucrat may request the removal of permissions at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Permissions removed for not meeting bureaucrat activity requirements may be re-obtained through a new request for bureaucratship.
|
” |
To assist with the implementation of this requirement, please see Wikipedia:Bureaucrat activity. Modeled after Wikipedia:Inactive administrators and similar to that process, the log page will be created on 1 September 2015. Bureaucrats who have not met the activity requirements as of that date will be notified by email (where possible) and on their talk page to advise of the pending removal.
If the notified user does not return to bureaucrat activity and the permissions are removed, they will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFB. Removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon the affected user in any way.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. –xenotalk 20:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Please note that any potential restoration of permissions is also subject to Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Inactive bureaucrat accounts: a former bureaucrat who has been completely inactive for three years would need to seek reinstatement at WP:RFB notwithstanding the above. –xenotalk 12:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Milo Yiannopoulos
[edit]The article Milo Yiannopoulos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable person.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kabahaly (talk) 10:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Anton Lechner.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anton Lechner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jarekt (talk) 15:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC) --Jarekt (talk) 15:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ICRC letter - traceable deaths only.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ICRC letter - traceable deaths only.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 6 June 2020 (UTC)