Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memebot: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result of the debate was '''delete'''. <span style="font-size:99%">'''[[User:Sango123|<span style="color:darkblue;">Sango</span>]][[User talk:Sango123|<span style="color:gray;"><span style="cursor:help">123</span></span>]]'''</span> 15:38, 17 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Memebot]]=== |
===[[Memebot]]=== |
||
dicdef, neologism, nn. '''Delete'''. [[User:KleenupKrew|KleenupKrew]] 22:34, 2 June 2006 (UTC) |
dicdef, neologism, nn. '''Delete'''. [[User:KleenupKrew|KleenupKrew]] 22:34, 2 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NEO]]. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 21:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NEO]]. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 21:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Dumb''', '''dumb''' idea! MEME itself is a neologism. To delete this article on the basis of neologism policy is just obscenely stupid. I'm certain secondary sources could be found that mention the word Memebot. It's a widespread memetical concept. |
*'''Dumb''', '''dumb''' idea! MEME itself is a neologism. To delete this article on the basis of neologism policy is just obscenely stupid. I'm certain secondary sources could be found that mention the word Memebot. It's a widespread memetical concept. |
||
*:''-Ormuz Bey'' <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:200.138.33.29|200.138.33.29]] ([[User talk:200.138.33.29|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/200.138.33.29|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small> |
|||
*maybe put an entry in wiktionary, then link all existing references to the wiktionary article for clarifcation. otherwise how are all the new members of alt.satanism going to get up to speed? it is a *regularly used term in memetics*. or we should just ditch wikipedia entries on 'meme' and 'memetics' itself (i agree, neologism argument invalid) <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:66.57.13.147|66.57.13.147]] ([[User talk:66.57.13.147|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/66.57.13.147|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small> |
|||
*'''Keep it''' -- I found it valuable to have this entry here and linked through memetic engineering. It describes a great term for a great concept. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:70.46.5.164|70.46.5.164]] ([[User talk:70.46.5.164|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.46.5.164|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small> |
|||
:''''' <span style="color:#CC6600;">AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.</span>'''''<br><small> Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 13:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Delete''' per nom, nn neo. Google returns a bunch of references to a free webhosting service, memebot.com, which one of the anons above also added into an article, so I'm suspicious of advertising here. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan1967]] 14:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. It's unsourced and seems farcical, to me. [[User:PJM|PJM]] 14:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' the neologism . --[[User:Starionwolf|Starionwolf]] 18:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' as neologism. -- [[User:Docether|Docether]] 19:14, 12 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' as [[Wikipedia:original research|original research]]; cites no [[Wikipedia:reliable sources|reliable sources]]. If this term was actually used in serious studies of [[memetics]], surely an academic citation (even if from a fringe journal) could be found. —[[User:Ilmari Karonen|Ilmari Karonen]] <small>([[User talk:Ilmari Karonen|talk]])</small> 19:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NEO]]. [[User:Voice of Treason|Voice of Treason]] 23:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' per Voice of Treason. —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoikhoi]]</span> 03:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''', or maybe redirect to [[memetics]]. --[[User:Zoz|Zoz]] ''[[User_talk:Zoz|(t)]]'' 20:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong Keep''' I agrey with [[User:200.138.33.29|200.138.33.29]] or at least merge it with meme --[[User:Alexthegreater|alex]] 03:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
''-Ormuz Bey'' |
|||