User talk:Kramden4700/1

It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of Wrath of Roth. Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log.

Welcome, Kramden4700/1, to Wikipedia!

Enjoy editing here on Wikipedia and I hope you will stay! Be sure to post your name on the Wikipedia new user log. Below are some useful tutorials and places of interest:

• Editing tutorial — learn how to edit articles
• Five pillars of Wikipedia — learn about Wikipedia's basic guidelines and policies
• How to write a great article— learn how to creat feature article-status articles
• Picture tutorial — learn how to upload pictures
• Manual of Style — learn how articles should be written
• Sandbox — practice writing articles
• RC Patrol — help to prevent vandalism
• Wikiprojects — join a group that suits your interest

You can sign your comments on talk pages with four tildes: ~~~~; this adds your name and current time to your comments. If you need any more help, come to Bootcamp, add {{helpme}} to your talk page, or contact me on my talk page. Have fun!

--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 01:55, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi

I don't know what your talking about regarding the message you left on my talk page, if you could point me to a username/ip it might help. ;-) --Andeh 02:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• The user was User:Steers got horns kid, you don't who was banned. Kramden4700 03:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

I don't know what you were thinking, but he's gone. ;) Andeh 05:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

==

Cecily does not have a bachelor of science in meteorology. Therefore she is not a REAL meteorologist. A Mississippi State degree does NOT a meteorologist make, no matter what WPVI says. Adam Joseph is the only one on that station who is the real deal. Famartin 20:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Not Vandalizing!

Removing inaccurate information is essential to the proper operation of any Wiki. That being said, check with KYW yourself to find the information regarding Mike Puccinelli. ngsantia

• You have vandalized Wikipedia before and your track record indicates you are a vandal. You will be reported to an administrator if your vandalism does not stop. Kramden4700 00:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

WCAU Personalities

Hi. I found that you had some WNBC persons listed on the WCAU Personalities page. I took the initiative to correct this by removing Brian Thompson and creating a proper page with his information there, although it needs to be beefed up some, changed the bit about David Ushery to reflect his appearances on WCAU, and moved Pat Battle to the "Past Personalities" section. Buckner 1986 17:53, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

• If I have made inaccurate statements I am glad you have corrected them. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Kramden4700 17:57, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

• You are welcome. Buckner 1986 18:11, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Channel 48

They need to be merged. Now, stop being uncivil about it, don't make me go to RfC. CoolKatt number 99999 04:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

CoolKatt number 99999

You have been bitten by him, I see. He is nothing but a bully who wants nothing but his own way and will not stop until he gets it. If you haven't already, leave a comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/CoolKatt number 99999, but I am considering requesting that page to be deleted so I can start a new RfC against him. He needs to be checked in a big way. Rollosmokes 14:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Don't listen to Rollosmokes. He has been uncivil to a lot of users. Don't let him be uncivil to you as well. CoolKatt number 99999 01:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The Price Is Right article move

I support the move and creation of a disambiguation page for The Price Is Right, but feel it should be moved to The Price Is Right (1972) as to be consistant with article naming. The current set up volates the Nationalistic bias clause of WP:NPOV and assumes that everyone is an American, something is just plain wrong as not everyone in the world is an American or even knows about the show - something which also needs to be fixed in the articles. Rekarb Bob 17:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration/CoolKatt

After noticing that CK filed an investigation against me without my knowledge on July 1, I have decided to move forward with a Request for Arbitration. He now has an RfC, an investigation against himself, and now this to deal with. I have listed you, along with CFIF, Lambertman, and Crossmr as the main complaintants (sp?). At your earliest convenience, please contribute. Rollosmokes 18:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Wow is all I can say.--Crossmr 15:03, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop stalking me (WP:STALK), I already have 2 others stalking me. CoolKatt number 99999 03:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Gardner/Goldman

Hi,

The claims you dispute in James Goldman (actor) also appear verbatim in Jim Gardner (James Goldman). If they are false, they need to be removed from both articles first. I will investigate, but the article should not be speedied for now. Best wishes, Xoloz 03:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

When I told you I was investigating, it was inappropriate for you to revert me. For that, you are warned; please respect administrators as we try to do our jobs.

On investigation, I find that Jim Gardner was born with the name James Goldman -- that assertion in Jim Gardner (James Goldman) is supported. I have, however, moved Jim Gardner (James Goldman) to Jim Gardner (broadcaster) to conform with WP:MOS. I will now also delete James Goldman (actor) as an implausible redirect. Best wishes, Xoloz 03:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I have also created the redirect James Goldman (broadcaster), redirected to Jim Gardner (broadcaster). This accounts for the reality of Mr. Gardner's stage name, which Wikipedia has a duty to report, while eliminating any suggestion that Mr. Gardner is an actor or a fictional character, because he is neither. Best wishes, Xoloz 03:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

It's not going to work out for me this time, though. I do agree; it's most likely too early. I'll just keep being a good editor in the meantime. ;) Lambertman 13:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your nice comment on my edits! Pressure Thirteen 14:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Reverting Philadelphia to disambiguation

So you too believe there is more than one primary and overwhelming meaning of Philadelphia than the city? See my message for Wrath of Roth. His edit was the vandalism, as he overwrote a redirect of Philadelphia to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania that had existed for over one year (see the history page). There is a disambiguation page for Philadelphia, Philadelphia (disambiguation). If you or him believe that links to Philadelphia must point to a disambig page, let's talk about it there. I strongly disagree. And I really resent accusations of vandalism, as I have never been seriously accused of vandalism in my almost 1,000 edits in almost a year, except for the first time, which was caused by dynamic IP addresses. Tinlinkin 06:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Please respond to Talk:Philadelphia before editing that article again - note cut-and-paste is bad. --Scott Davis ^Talk 05:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Houston

Thank you for experimenting with the page Houston,Texas on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Postoak 06:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Precisely what aspect of WP:NPOV do this edit and [1] revert? --Scott Davis ^Talk 10:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I am`awaiting a link to a section or identifying a paragraph or sentence of WP:NPOV that you think I have violated. You have violated WP:3RR, WP:AGF and WP:POINT, I suspect. --Scott Davis ^Talk 10:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

OK, so what WP:NPOV#Bias am I supposed to be influenced by? Pragmatism is not a bias. --Scott Davis ^Talk 11:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

RE: Houston, Texas article, I'm not sure how I violated WP:NPOV according to your accusation on my talk page. Apparently you (and possibly your multiple personalities) have quite a history correcting neutrality violations on city pages based on your interpretation of WP:NPOV. I would sincerely appreciate your clarification of the issue. Please come to Talk:Houston, Texas to discuss this, Thanks Postoak 20:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

anchor cruft

Based on your participation at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Angela_Russell, I thought you'd like to know that the AFD has been restarted and moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Russell (second nomination), where you can vote on it a second time. JianLi 17:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Also, please see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WPVI-TV_Anchors JianLi 17:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)