Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS. (TW)
 
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 18:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
===[[:FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS]]===
:{{la|FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 13#{{anchorencode:FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/FiscalityONE_ERP_MRP_WMS Stats]</span>)
:{{la|FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 13#{{anchorencode:FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/FiscalityONE_ERP_MRP_WMS Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS}})
:({{Find sources AFD|FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS}})
Software with no claim in article of meeting the notability guidelines. Goodfaith google search turns up zero independent sources -- only the company's website, facebook, and other user-submitted content comes up. Prod tag was removed by the article creator without addressing any of the concerns, so here we are. [[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#228b22" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 19:09, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Software with no claim in article of meeting the notability guidelines. Goodfaith google search turns up zero independent sources -- only the company's website, facebook, and other user-submitted content comes up. Prod tag was removed by the article creator without addressing any of the concerns, so here we are. [[User:Fabrictramp|<span style="color:#228b22; font-family:comic sans ms;">Fabrictramp</span>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<span style="color:#960018; font-family:Papyrus;">talk to me</span>]] 19:09, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 19:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|list of Companies-related deletion discussions]]. <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;">[[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|'''CAPTAIN RAJU''']]</span><sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 22:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' as per nom, all content is promotional. [[User:Power~enwiki|Power~enwiki]] ([[User talk:Power~enwiki|talk]]) 00:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' [[User:CaySeven|CaySeven]] ([[User talk:CaySeven|talk]]) 15:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC) The software is notable to its developers, investors, customers (past and present) and users (past and present) for over twenty years. The software is also worthy of note to customers in the market for a new system. Notability is line with those other many software packages listed in Wikipedia, for various reasons, and external references or citations listing injections of venture funding do not in themselves infer notability, yet seem to be accepted. After being present in the bespoke market for over two decades, the FiscalityONE entry on wikipedia will be able to cite external references as becomes more publicly known. Yet is still notable. The article is objective, non-promotional, impartial and in line with the wording of other unchallenged entries.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:CaySeven|CaySeven]] ([[User talk:CaySeven#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/CaySeven|contribs]]) </small>
**'''Comment''' And there's the problem. {{purple|''The software is also worthy of note to customers in the market for a new system''}} - Wikipedia is [[WP:NOTADVERTISING|not a free marketing channel]]. [[User:HighKing|<span style="font-family:Courier; color:darkgreen;"><b>-- HighKing</b></span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:HighKing|<span style="font-family:Courier; color:darkblue;">++ </span>]]</sup> 17:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - no evidence of any notability. Very clearly promotional. <span style="background-color:lightblue">'''''&nbsp;[[User:Velella|Velella]]&nbsp;'''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue">&nbsp;<sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup>&nbsp;</span> 14:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant [[WP:RS]] coverage. Article was created by an [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|SPA]] as possibly promotional. [[User:Dialectric|Dialectric]] ([[User talk:Dialectric|talk]]) 13:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - subject lacks significance and fails to meet [[WP:NOTE]] criteria.--[[User:SamHolt6|SamHolt6]] ([[User talk:SamHolt6|talk]]) 14:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' per nom and [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]]. - [[User:GretLomborg|GretLomborg]] ([[User talk:GretLomborg|talk]]) 04:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:SPIP]] and GNG, references fail [[WP:CORPDEPTH]] and [[WP:ORGIND]]. [[User:HighKing|<span style="font-family:Courier; color:darkgreen;"><b>-- HighKing</b></span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:HighKing|<span style="font-family:Courier; color:darkblue;">++ </span>]]</sup> 17:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 14:24, 10 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software with no claim in article of meeting the notability guidelines. Goodfaith google search turns up zero independent sources -- only the company's website, facebook, and other user-submitted content comes up. Prod tag was removed by the article creator without addressing any of the concerns, so here we are. Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:09, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.