User talk:Soxwon/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

9/11 conspiracy theories article subheading

You just reverted my change of "Accepted account" to "9/11 Commission account" in this article. Please discuss this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:9/11_conspiracy_theories#Accepted_account_vs._9.2F11_Commission_account_subheading Thanks, Ghostofnemo (talk) 18:21, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

3rr

The three-revert rule ("3RR") states:

"An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the 3RR rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours." One more revert and you are in violation of the 3rr rule and will be reported as such DocOfSoc (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

You have been politely asked to discuss on talk page before reverting. Please do so. BTW, you are now in violation of 3rr rule. YOu are also engaging in edit warring. Another violation. How about if we both step back until later today. Cooler heads will usually prevail, and the other editors have time for their input. TY for your cooperation. Namaste...DocOfSoc (talk) 15:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

• Thank you both for noticing this morning's edit war and taking steps to end it collegially. If you think it would help, please do not hesitate to request page protection at my talkpage or Requests for page protection. Regards, - 2/0 (cont.) 02:36, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Yo

No apology necessary, mate. I often see editors who may personally not like particular sources to voice objections to material in the terms of that personal objection, even when there is also a valid policy concern for exclusion of material as well. I try to put aside what I personally think of a source, and then evaluate sources against the criteria set forth in policy and respect the community consensus (especially when it's well litigated). In the end, we both agree that there is no demonstrated weight to merit inclusion; just make sure to use policy and consensus as the reasoning. Pardon if this sounded like a sanctimonious lecture; it's offered as friendly advice.  :) Happy new year! //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:07, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

"fight the power"

Fight what power? --67.250.89.3 (talk) 21:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

That wasn't me. It might have been someone else living in my house, though. --67.250.89.3 (talk) 00:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I got an account. --Edward Rankin (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Random comment in passing

If I were to build a playlist for my MP3 music player based solely off the music you have listed on your user page, I would be quite satisfied indeed. Happy New Year :-) Xenophrenic (talk) 22:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

PROD of Ernie the Giant Chicken

Hi,

I removed the PROD tag you placed on Ernie the Giant Chicken, as a previous version of that article had an AFD discussion, which makes the article ineligible for deletion by PROD. If you think that the article does not address the concerns of the previous AFD and is substantially the same as the one deleted after the AFD, you can nominate it for speedy deletion under criterion G4. If you think the article may be substantially different than the one deleted in that discussion, but still think it should be deleted, then you would need to start a new AFD discussion about it. Calathan (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

You are missing steps in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernie the Giant Chicken, Please see Wikipedia:Afd#How_to_list_pages_for_deletion for instructions. CTJF83 16:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

I think you need to give him time to edit. It takes a few minutes to go through all the steps to create an AFD (if you are doing it manually). Calathan (talk) 16:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Ah, ya, I haven't done that in a while...Soxwon, if you install WP:TW, it makes AfD and a lot of other stuff a lot easier. :) CTJF83 16:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Ok, cool, 'tis no problem. CTJF83 21:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Soxwon, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Soxwon. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Glenn Beck article

You seem to be trying to start a fight with me. I have not spoken to you and I have not held anything against you, so please cut the condescending remarks you are making to me.AerobicFox (talk) 06:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Aerobic, you are the one who is fighting for the sake of fighting. Each time we give you a valid source, a valid argument, etc you strike back with an oblique interpretation or a semantic argument. BlennGeck (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Look at the time stamps, you are responding 10 days late to something completely unrelated...AerobicFox (talk) 02:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Beckapalooza

Hi Soxwon. Thank you for your invitation, however I think I'm going to abstain for the moment. While I agree with you and the new fellow, in that criticism and coverage is widespread and germane, I simply don't believe that all the participants are there in good faith (and therefore, arguing with them will not result in meaningful progress). I've been dealing with those sorts for years, and I've kindof given up the ghost on this article. There are simply too many True Believes -- some in plain sight, some not -- to have substantive policy discussions about the issues at hand. I'm sorry to let you down, as I feel this is an opportunity for us to work together for a change, but I've pretty much given up on that article (and several others). If things settle down into a little more structured forum I'll surely jump in, but it's devolved so much that it's hard to find an entry point and the opposition seems hell bent to ignore or invent policies to suit them. I guess I've lost the will to argue with people who ignore policy or apply it in bad faith. Just wanted to explain, so it doesn't look like I'm ignoring you. Thanks again! //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

This may be petty to bring up here, but said "new fellow" has been around the Glenn Beck article for about a year as an IP, looking up people's edit histories and calling them partisan and editing people's posts.AerobicFox (talk) 00:31, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Holy fuck. LynnCityofsin was your previous account, not just someone whose post you were editing.AerobicFox (talk) 00:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Blaxthos, is there anything that can be done about this. It really seems like true believers have the discussion page stacked. I have to believe that is some kind of violation of wiki guidelines. I find myself going gray because as soon as I satisfy an editor's criticism or concern he/she mystifies me with a complete misreading of the source material or semantic attempts to invert the source material's meaning. I would like to contribute to the article. And I don't have anything against Beck personally (I actually have a great deal of admiration for what he has done on Fox). But it makes no sense to exclude major controversies from a person's bio page, when the subject traffics in controversy. BlennGeck (talk) 14:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Wow. BlennGeck (talk) 01:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

McGlockin

Not to pour gas on the fire, but I just deleted an "article" that amounted to some kind of vandal report entitled Soxwon. User warned, I'll keep an eye on them. Acroterion _(talk) 21:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

On a closer review of their contributions, it looked like a better idea to call a time-out. They can read policy while blocked. Acroterion _(talk) 22:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Words

I'm leaving editing political articles for now since I seem to get stir up arguments in them. I actually do think well of you, and I am sorry for making myself difficult to work with. I hope you can accept my apology for starting unnecessary arguments.AerobicFox (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Yankees pics

Sure, go ahead and scan some of them, and I'll give it a shot. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 19:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Have you had a chance to do anything with this yet? :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 17:57, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Sounds good. No rush. P.S. Spring cannot come soon enough. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

edit warring at Talk:September 11 attacks

Beeblebrox (talk) 03:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Informational note: this is to let you know that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards, Beeblebrox (talk) 04:24, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

I'll leave it you to decide whether to report him or take him to AN/I or whatever...

I just do the floors, see? HalfShadow 03:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

I think I may have made him blush. Could this be love? HalfShadow 04:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

No... It's "What is love, baby don't hurt me..."

Get yer memes right. HalfShadow 04:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Reverted edits in US state terrorism

Hi, I see that you recently reverted my edits. I appreciate your referring to them as "good faith" edits because that's what they are. I of course understand that this is a very tricky subject, but as you can probably see from the talk page, I'm very eager to find a solution to this other than just leaving the intro as is. I'm ok with leaving it reverted, but I'd like to add something in its place. Do you have any suggestions as to how to proceed? Do you agree with my assessment that, without adding anything, the intro is reasonably disingenuous? If so, you see the issue -- there must be something else in the intro to qualify the fact that these aren't just "allegations" and "accusations" lacking hard evidence (that, in fact, evidence has been presented in international court and at the UN by nations such as Nicaragua/Cuba, and routinely in publications by academics as well). 173.3.41.6 (talk) 22:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Chad Ochocinco

Did he legally have his name changed back or did he just say he would change it back? If a reliable source says he legally filed the paperwork to change his name back, then the whole article's name should be changed. Until then, all the media sources I've seen have his last name as Ochocinco. Kansan (talk) 05:00, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

"The" versus "the Beatles"

There is a vote taking place in which we could use your input. — GabeMc (talk) 00:55, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

• I noticed that you had weighed in on the discussion so I pinged you to let you know about the newest vote. Participation is purely voluntary, and if I contacted you by mistake I apologise. — GabeMc (talk) 01:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7485331.stm does this help you any with the 911 discussion? am sure i have seen a doc from the bbc covering it but am still looking sorry am new here and dont understand how to edit correctly.

TimeKilla (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Thank you for your work on the September 11 attacks article! MONGO 23:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

List of footballers killed during World War II

I have reverted your move to this page as it was a) undiscussed and b) spelt incorrectly. Please take more care in future, and have a look at WP:RM if you still wish to move the page. Thanks and regards, GiantSnowman 13:45, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

blocked

I'm sorry that it has come to this but you really left no choice since you were explicitly warned the last time not to edit war about this again. It's a brief block, just 24 hours, for violating the terms of the Sept. 11 attacks arbitration case, of which you are already aware. As I recall you narrowly escaped being blocked before by declaring that you would not edit war in this area in the future, so fresh warnings for this latest bout were not issued. This is an arbitration enforcement block. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:49, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Politicians arrested and charges with corruption

You are invited for discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 June 1 and also Category talk:Politicians arrested and charges with corruption- . Shlok _{talk .} 17:35, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

US National Archives collaboration

United States National Archives WikiProject

Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts. There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Falkland Islands

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Falkland Islands. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:University of International Relations

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:University of International Relations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 06:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Requests for comment

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Requests for comment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Windsor University School of Medicine

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Windsor University School of Medicine. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Glenn Beck

Hi Soxwon - I have opened a section on Glenn Beck's talk page (here) to discuss the phrase "what they claim are" that you have recently added to the article. I'm going to wait a day or so for you (or any other interested party) to comment on, and then if no one does or if some semblance of consensus is reached, I shall act on my suggestion. (I am leaving this message both on your page, and on the page of the other person recently directly involved in editing that section.) Kevin (talk) 18:49, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Militant atheism

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Militant atheism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Iranian Azerbaijanis

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Iranian Azerbaijanis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 20:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mexico City

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mexico City. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 08:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sri Lanka

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sri Lanka. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 21:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Serer people

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Serer people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Armadillomon. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  20:14, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

I fixed the issue. Next time close the AfD (using {{Afdtop}} and {{Afdbottom}}) before removing the template from the article. —SW— ^babble 20:23, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Art Pope

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Art Pope. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 16:16, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Conservapedia

Please discuss at Talk:Conservapedia#Far right to get consensus before sticking far right into the lead again. Dmcq (talk) 09:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

The first and third reference don't seem to support what's said, could you quote what the second said that supports it please as I have no access? Dmcq (talk) 10:40, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pakistan studies

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pakistan studies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:South Asia

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:South Asia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Romanians of Serbia

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Romanians of Serbia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hunnic Empire

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hunnic Empire. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

It's not ok to put personal insults in the talk page of a Wikipedia Article.

Consiquently I've edited your addition to Talk:Richard Dawkins, to make sure your "point" is put across without the insult.

I considered reporting you. You should consider yourself lucky. Wikipedia:INSULTS, Wikipedia:Do not insult the vandals AND in particular Wikipedia:No personal attacksColliric (talk) 10:55, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Since no one was mentioned by name, does the above user have a "guilty conscience"? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 10:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

And as the other editor pointed out, you yourself are in danger of getting "reported" if you mess with others' comments. Beware the "consiquences"! ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 11:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ushuaia

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ushuaia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Leo Wanta

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Leo Wanta. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Northern Ireland

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Northern Ireland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jewish Internet Defense Force

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jewish Internet Defense Force. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Correlates of crime

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Correlates of crime. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Libyan civil war

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Libyan civil war. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Presidency of Barack Obama

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Presidency of Barack Obama. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Sgt. Pepper Straw Poll

There is currently a Straw poll taking place here. Your input would be appreciated. ~ GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 22:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Tea Party politicians

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Tea Party politicians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Beatles RfC

Hello this message is to inform you that there is currently a public poll to determine whether to capitalize the definite article ("the") when mentioning the band "THE BEATLES" mid-sentence. As you've previously participated either here, here, or here, your input would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. For the mediators. ~ GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 23:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Caste

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Caste. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:49, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Colombian armed conflict (1964–present)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Colombian armed conflict (1964–present). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hezekiah's Tunnel

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hezekiah's Tunnel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dar es Salaam

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dar es Salaam. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Kerry military service controversy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Kerry military service controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Slavery in Africa

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Slavery in Africa. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Disappearance of Madeleine McCann

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:History of the Falkland Islands

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:History of the Falkland Islands. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:16, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

RfC United States same-sex marriage map

I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: RfC: How should we color Kansas? Prcc27 (talk) 09:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of wars involving the United States

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of wars involving the United States. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

RfC: Chile world same-sex marriage map

Please join discussion for how Chile should be colored. Prcc27 (talk) 21:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your classic rock userboxes

When I found your page browsing the WikiProject Politics participants, I noticed you had numerous userboxes regarding your tastes in classic rock. I was wondering where you found them.. I'd like to add those to my user page as well. We literally have the same interests; classic rock, we're both atheists, and interested in politics, presumably. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 04:35, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Alex Ferguson

There really isnt much to discuss here, I am not bringing subjective views but rather the views of the sources. Look at the sources and the info they corroborate. Davefelmer (talk) 03:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Soxwon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Soxwon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)