Stable manifold: Difference between revisions
→top: illustration |
|||
(39 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[mathematics]], and in particular the study of [[dynamical systems]], the idea of ''stable and unstable sets'' or stable and unstable manifolds give a formal mathematical definition to the general notions embodied in the idea of an [[attractor]] or [[repellor]]. In the case of [[hyperbolic dynamics]], the corresponding notion is that of the [[hyperbolic set]]. |
{{Short description|Formalization of the idea of an attractor or repellor in dynamical systems}} |
||
In [[mathematics]], and in particular the study of [[dynamical systems]], the idea of ''stable and unstable sets'' or '''stable and unstable manifolds''' give a formal mathematical definition to the general notions embodied in the idea of an [[attractor]] or [[repellor]]. In the case of [[hyperbolic dynamics]], the corresponding notion is that of the [[hyperbolic set]]. |
|||
[[File:Hyperbolic flow example, illustrating stable and unstable manifolds.png|thumb|Example hyperbolic flow, illustrating stable and unstable manifolds. The vector field equation is <math>(x + \exp(-y), -y)</math>. The stable manifold is the x-axis, and the unstable manifold is the other asymptotic curve crossing the x-axis.]] |
|||
== Physical example == |
|||
The gravitational [[tidal force]]s acting on the [[rings of Saturn]] provide an easy-to-visualize physical example. The tidal forces flatten the ring into the equatorial plane, even as they stretch it out in the radial direction. Imagining the rings to be sand or gravel particles ("dust") in orbit around Saturn, the tidal forces are such that any perturbations that push particles above or below the equatorial plane results in that particle feeling a restoring force, pushing it back into the plane. Particles effectively oscillate in a harmonic well, damped by collisions. The stable direction is perpendicular to the ring. The unstable direction is along any radius, where forces stretch and pull particles apart. Two particles that start very near each other in [[phase space]] will experience radial forces causing them to diverge, radially. These forces have a positive [[Lyapunov exponent]]; the trajectories lie on a hyperbolic manifold, and the movement of particles is essentially [[Chaos_theory|chaotic]], wandering through the rings. The [[center manifold]] is tangential to the rings, with particles experiencing neither compression nor stretching. This allows second-order gravitational forces to dominate, and so particles can be entrained by moons or moonlets in the rings, [[circle map|phase locking]] to them. The gravitational forces of the moons effectively provide a regularly repeating small kick, each time around the orbit, akin to a [[kicked rotor]], such as found in a [[phase-locked loop]]. |
|||
The discrete-time motion of particles in the ring can be approximated by the [[Poincaré map]]. The map effectively provides the [[transfer matrix]] of the system. The eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue of the matrix is the [[Frobenius-Perron eigenvector|Frobenius–Perron eigenvector]], which is also the [[invariant measure]], ''i.e'' the actual density of the particles in the ring. All other eigenvectors of the transfer matrix have smaller eigenvalues, and correspond to decaying modes. |
|||
==Definition== |
==Definition== |
||
The following provides a definition for the case of a system that is either an [[iterated function]] or has discrete-time dynamics. Similar notions apply for systems whose time evolution is given by a [[flow (mathematics)|flow]]. |
The following provides a definition for the case of a system that is either an [[iterated function]] or has discrete-time dynamics. Similar notions apply for systems whose time evolution is given by a [[flow (mathematics)|flow]]. |
||
Let <math>X</math> be a [[topological space]], and <math>f\colon X\ |
Let <math>X</math> be a [[topological space]], and <math>f\colon X\to X</math> a [[homeomorphism]]. If <math>p</math> is a [[Fixed point (mathematics)|fixed point]] for <math>f</math>, the '''stable set of <math>p</math>''' is defined by |
||
:<math>W^s(f,p) =\{q\in X: f^n(q)\ |
:<math>W^s(f,p) =\{q\in X: f^n(q)\to p \mbox{ as } n\to \infty \}</math> |
||
and the '''unstable set of <math>p</math>''' is defined by |
and the '''unstable set of <math>p</math>''' is defined by |
||
:<math>W^u(f,p) =\{q\in X: f^{-n}(q)\ |
:<math>W^u(f,p) =\{q\in X: f^{-n}(q)\to p \mbox{ as } n\to \infty \}.</math> |
||
Here, <math>f^{-1}</math> denotes the [[ |
Here, <math>f^{-1}</math> denotes the [[Inverse function|inverse]] of the function <math>f</math>, i.e. |
||
<math>f\circ f^{-1}=f^{-1}\circ f =id_{X}</math>, where <math>id_{X}</math> is the identity map on <math>X</math>. |
|||
If <math>p</math> is a [[periodic point]] of least period <math>k</math>, then it is a fixed point of <math>f^k</math>, and the stable and unstable sets of <math>p</math> are |
If <math>p</math> is a [[periodic point]] of least period <math>k</math>, then it is a fixed point of <math>f^k</math>, and the stable and unstable sets of <math>p</math> are defined by |
||
:<math>W^s(f,p) = W^s(f^k,p)</math> |
:<math>W^s(f,p) = W^s(f^k,p)</math> |
||
Line 26: | Line 34: | ||
If <math>X</math> is [[metrizable]], we can define the stable and unstable sets for any point by |
If <math>X</math> is [[metrizable]], we can define the stable and unstable sets for any point by |
||
:<math>W^s(f,p) = \{q\in |
:<math>W^s(f,p) = \{q\in X: d(f^n(q),f^n(p))\to 0 \mbox { for } n\to \infty \}</math> |
||
and |
and |
||
:<math>W^u(f,p) = W^s(f^{-1},p),</math> |
:<math>W^u(f,p) = W^s(f^{-1},p),</math> |
||
Line 32: | Line 40: | ||
where <math>d</math> is a [[Metric (mathematics)|metric]] for <math>X</math>. This definition clearly coincides with the previous one when <math>p</math> is a periodic point. |
where <math>d</math> is a [[Metric (mathematics)|metric]] for <math>X</math>. This definition clearly coincides with the previous one when <math>p</math> is a periodic point. |
||
Suppose now that <math>X</math> is a [[compact]] [[smooth manifold]], and <math>f</math> is a <math>\mathcal{C}^k</math> [[diffeomorphism]], <math>k\geq 1</math>. If <math>p</math> is a hyperbolic periodic point, the [[stable manifold theorem]] assures that for some neighborhood <math>U</math> of <math>p</math>, the local stable and unstable sets are <math>\mathcal{C}^k</math> embedded disks, whose [[tangent space]]s at <math>p</math> are <math>E^s</math> and <math>E^u</math> (the stable and unstable spaces of <math>Df(p)</math>), respectively; moreover, they vary continuously (in a certain sense) in a neighborhood of <math>f</math> in the <math>\mathcal{C}^k</math> topology of <math>\mathrm{Diff}^k(X)</math> (the space of all <math>\mathcal{C}^k</math> diffeomorphisms from <math>X</math> to itself). Finally, the stable and unstable sets are <math>\mathcal{C}^k</math> injectively immersed disks. This is why they are commonly called '''stable and unstable manifolds'''. This result is also valid for nonperiodic points, as long as they lie in some [[hyperbolic set]] (stable manifold theorem for hyperbolic sets). |
Suppose now that <math>X</math> is a [[compact space|compact]] [[smooth manifold]], and <math>f</math> is a <math>\mathcal{C}^k</math> [[diffeomorphism]], <math>k\geq 1</math>. If <math>p</math> is a hyperbolic periodic point, the [[stable manifold theorem]] assures that for some neighborhood <math>U</math> of <math>p</math>, the local stable and unstable sets are <math>\mathcal{C}^k</math> embedded disks, whose [[tangent space]]s at <math>p</math> are <math>E^s</math> and <math>E^u</math> (the stable and unstable spaces of <math>Df(p)</math>), respectively; moreover, they vary continuously (in a certain sense) in a neighborhood of <math>f</math> in the <math>\mathcal{C}^k</math> topology of <math>\mathrm{Diff}^k(X)</math> (the space of all <math>\mathcal{C}^k</math> diffeomorphisms from <math>X</math> to itself). Finally, the stable and unstable sets are <math>\mathcal{C}^k</math> injectively immersed disks. This is why they are commonly called '''stable and unstable manifolds'''. This result is also valid for nonperiodic points, as long as they lie in some [[hyperbolic set]] (stable manifold theorem for hyperbolic sets). |
||
==Remark== |
|||
If <math>X</math> is a (finite-dimensional) [[vector space]] and <math>f</math> an isomorphism, its stable and unstable sets are called stable space and unstable space, respectively. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
* [[Invariant manifold]] |
|||
* [[Center manifold]] |
|||
* [[Limit set]] |
* [[Limit set]] |
||
* [[Julia set]] |
* [[Julia set]] |
||
* [[Slow manifold]] |
|||
* [[Inertial manifold]] |
|||
* [[Normally hyperbolic invariant manifold]] |
|||
* [[Lagrangian coherent structure]] |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
* Ralph Abraham |
*{{cite book |first1=Ralph |last1=Abraham |first2=Jerrold E. |last2=Marsden |title=Foundations of Mechanics |year=1978 |publisher=Benjamin/Cummings |location=Reading Mass. |isbn=0-8053-0102-X }} |
||
*{{cite book |first=Michael C. |last=Irwin |chapter=Stable Manifolds |title=Smooth Dynamical Systems |publisher=World Scientific |year=2001 |isbn=981-02-4599-8 |pages=143–160 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gmBqDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA143 }} |
|||
*{{cite book |first=S. S. |last=Sritharan |title=Invariant Manifold Theory for Hydrodynamic Transition |year=1990 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |location=New York |isbn=0-582-06781-2 }} |
|||
{{ |
{{PlanetMath attribution|id=4357|title=Stable manifold}} |
||
[[Category:Limit sets]] |
[[Category:Limit sets]] |
||
[[Category:Dynamical systems]] |
|||
[[Category:Manifolds]] |
Latest revision as of 23:31, 18 April 2023
In mathematics, and in particular the study of dynamical systems, the idea of stable and unstable sets or stable and unstable manifolds give a formal mathematical definition to the general notions embodied in the idea of an attractor or repellor. In the case of hyperbolic dynamics, the corresponding notion is that of the hyperbolic set.
Physical example
[edit]The gravitational tidal forces acting on the rings of Saturn provide an easy-to-visualize physical example. The tidal forces flatten the ring into the equatorial plane, even as they stretch it out in the radial direction. Imagining the rings to be sand or gravel particles ("dust") in orbit around Saturn, the tidal forces are such that any perturbations that push particles above or below the equatorial plane results in that particle feeling a restoring force, pushing it back into the plane. Particles effectively oscillate in a harmonic well, damped by collisions. The stable direction is perpendicular to the ring. The unstable direction is along any radius, where forces stretch and pull particles apart. Two particles that start very near each other in phase space will experience radial forces causing them to diverge, radially. These forces have a positive Lyapunov exponent; the trajectories lie on a hyperbolic manifold, and the movement of particles is essentially chaotic, wandering through the rings. The center manifold is tangential to the rings, with particles experiencing neither compression nor stretching. This allows second-order gravitational forces to dominate, and so particles can be entrained by moons or moonlets in the rings, phase locking to them. The gravitational forces of the moons effectively provide a regularly repeating small kick, each time around the orbit, akin to a kicked rotor, such as found in a phase-locked loop.
The discrete-time motion of particles in the ring can be approximated by the Poincaré map. The map effectively provides the transfer matrix of the system. The eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue of the matrix is the Frobenius–Perron eigenvector, which is also the invariant measure, i.e the actual density of the particles in the ring. All other eigenvectors of the transfer matrix have smaller eigenvalues, and correspond to decaying modes.
Definition
[edit]The following provides a definition for the case of a system that is either an iterated function or has discrete-time dynamics. Similar notions apply for systems whose time evolution is given by a flow.
Let be a topological space, and a homeomorphism. If is a fixed point for , the stable set of is defined by
and the unstable set of is defined by
Here, denotes the inverse of the function , i.e. , where is the identity map on .
If is a periodic point of least period , then it is a fixed point of , and the stable and unstable sets of are defined by
and
Given a neighborhood of , the local stable and unstable sets of are defined by
and
If is metrizable, we can define the stable and unstable sets for any point by
and
where is a metric for . This definition clearly coincides with the previous one when is a periodic point.
Suppose now that is a compact smooth manifold, and is a diffeomorphism, . If is a hyperbolic periodic point, the stable manifold theorem assures that for some neighborhood of , the local stable and unstable sets are embedded disks, whose tangent spaces at are and (the stable and unstable spaces of ), respectively; moreover, they vary continuously (in a certain sense) in a neighborhood of in the topology of (the space of all diffeomorphisms from to itself). Finally, the stable and unstable sets are injectively immersed disks. This is why they are commonly called stable and unstable manifolds. This result is also valid for nonperiodic points, as long as they lie in some hyperbolic set (stable manifold theorem for hyperbolic sets).
Remark
[edit]If is a (finite-dimensional) vector space and an isomorphism, its stable and unstable sets are called stable space and unstable space, respectively.
See also
[edit]- Invariant manifold
- Center manifold
- Limit set
- Julia set
- Slow manifold
- Inertial manifold
- Normally hyperbolic invariant manifold
- Lagrangian coherent structure
References
[edit]- Abraham, Ralph; Marsden, Jerrold E. (1978). Foundations of Mechanics. Reading Mass.: Benjamin/Cummings. ISBN 0-8053-0102-X.
- Irwin, Michael C. (2001). "Stable Manifolds". Smooth Dynamical Systems. World Scientific. pp. 143–160. ISBN 981-02-4599-8.
- Sritharan, S. S. (1990). Invariant Manifold Theory for Hydrodynamic Transition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-582-06781-2.
This article incorporates material from Stable manifold on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.