Jump to content

User:NarenThanikesh/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
due date screen shot
Removing Duedaterspec.png; it has been deleted from Commons by Krd because: No license since 13 April 2023.
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== '''Introduction''' ==
== '''Introduction''' ==


=== '''Expertiza''' ===
=== Expertiza ===
Expertiza is an open source project based on Ruby on Rails framework. Expertiza allows the instructor to create new assignments and customize new or existing assignments. It also allows the instructor to create a list of topics the students can sign up for. Students can form teams in Expertiza to work on various projects and assignments. Students can also peer review other students' submissions. Expertiza supports submission across various document types, including the URLs and word documents.Expertiza provides a dashboard for all the Assignments corresponding to a course and provides absolute control to the Instructors and Teaching Assistant. In addition to Assignments, it encompasses peer reviews where in participants are allowed to provide feedback anonymously about each other's work thereby providing scope for better outcome. The due_date.rb file is responsible for informing the users about the deadline for submission of the each assignment. Due date in Expertiza have their association with many other components like Assignments, Reviews etc.
Expertiza<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://expertiza.ncsu.edu/|title=|last=|first=|date=|website=|publisher=|access-date=}}</ref> is an open source project for school assignment management for instructors and students based on the Ruby on Rails<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://rubyonrails.org/|title=Ruby on Rails|website=rubyonrails.org|access-date=2016-10-28}}</ref> framework. Expertiza allows the instructor to create new assignments and customize new or existing assignments. It also allows the instructor to create a list of topics the students can sign up for. Students can form teams in Expertiza to work on various projects and assignments. Students can also peer review other students' submissions. Expertiza supports submission across various document types, including the URLs and word documents. Expertiza provides a dashboard for all the assignments corresponding to a course and provides absolute control to the Instructors and Teaching Assistants. In addition to assignments, it encompasses peer reviews wherein participants are allowed to provide feedback anonymously about each other's work thereby providing scope for the better outcome. The due_date.rb file is responsible for informing the users about the deadline for submission of the each assignment. Due dates in Expertiza have their association with many other components like assignments, reviews etc.


=== '''Code Climate''' ===
=== Code Climate ===
A Chrome extension for Code Climate. Code quality and test coverage feedback without ever leaving GitHub. To see issues displayed directly inside GitHub's UI. To review which lines are covered in diffs, files, and more. And add repos and open tickets without changing your workflow.
Code Climate<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://codeclimate.com/dashboard|title=Log in to your Code Climate dashboard with GitHub or your email.|website=codeclimate.com|access-date=2016-10-28}}</ref> is a tool that runs static analysis on a GitHub project and outputs many details like test coverage, complexity, duplication, security, style, and more. There is a Google Chrome extension to integrate the Code Climate results generated directly into GitHub which is visible when browsing the repository on the browser. It allows us to see issues displayed directly inside GitHub's UI, to review which lines are covered in diffs and files, and add repositories and open tickets without changing your workflow.


== '''Tasks Identified''' ==
== '''Tasks Identified''' ==
To install Code climate Chrome Extension that highlights the duplicated code
To install Code climate Chrome Extension that highlights the duplicated code.


To refactor the two file
To refactor the following two files:
* Due_date.rb
* Due_date.rb
** Ternary operators must not be nested. Prefer `if` or `else` constructs instead.
** Ternary operators must not be nested. Prefer `if` or `else` constructs instead.
Line 22: Line 22:
** Extra empty line detected at module body end.
** Extra empty line detected at module body end.


* Create RSpec file in /spec/models/ folder and write unit tests for each method in due_date.rb and deadline_helper.rb.
* Create respective RSpec<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://rspec.info/|title=RSpec: Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby|website=rspec.info|access-date=2016-10-28}}</ref> files in /spec/models/ and /spec/helpers folder and write unit tests for each method in due_date.rb and deadline_helper.rb.


== '''Current Implementation''' ==
== '''Current Implementation''' ==
This is a Model class to manage the deadlines of an assignment. It has methods for setting due dates for an assignment, copying due dates from one assignment to a new assignment etc. It focuses on refactoring some of the complex methods, modifying some of the language to make it more Ruby friendly. The goal of this project is to attempt to make this part of the application easier to read and check all the possible test cases that the application must pass. The testing part of the code is missing that is one of the tasks to be implemented by us in addition to refactoring the two given files.
DueDate is a Model class to manage the deadlines of an assignment. It has methods for setting due dates for an assignment, copying due dates from one assignment to a new assignment etc. DeadlineHelper provides helper functions that help DueDate perform certain tasks. The assignment focuses on refactoring some of the methods based on warnings received from Code Climate's static analysis and modifying the language to make it more Ruby-friendly. The assignment also involves writing unit test cases for due_date.rb and deadline_helper.rb in order to increase test coverage.

The goal of this project is to attempt to make this part of the application easier to read and write unit test cases that the application must pass.


== '''Changed Implementation''' ==
== '''Changed Implementation''' ==
Line 31: Line 33:


The modified files are
The modified files are
* Due_date.rb (path: /app/models)


* Deadline_helper.rb (path: /app/helpers)
Due_date.rb
* Deadline_helper.rb
Testing files
Testing files
* Due_date_spec.rb
* Due_date_spec.rb (path: /spec/models)
* Deadline_helper_spec.rb
* Deadline_helper_spec.rb (path: /spec/helpers)
=== Due_date.rb ===
* Converted for..in loop to object.each in order to follow better Ruby syntax.
* Unnecessary assignment to sorted_deadlines removed.
* Nested ternary operators have been changed to if..else in order to make it more readable.
**[[File:Duedaterb.png|thumb|Due_date.rb|center|500x500px]]
* Changed where(...).first to find_by(...) which is the newer recommended syntax.
* Corrected the Time.now functions by adding the correct zones to them such as Time.zone.now.
* Removed trailing white spaces.[[File:DueDaterb2.png|center|thumb|565x565px]]


=== '''Due_date.rb''' ===
=== Deadline_helper.rb ===
* Change for to each and sorted_deadlines corrected
** image 1
* Changed where to find_by and corrected the time functions
** image2
* Missing braces
** image

=== '''Deadline_helper.rb''' ===
* Time functions were changed to functions with zones
* Time functions were changed to functions with zones
* Extra line removed
* Extra line removed
[[File:Deadlinehelper.png|center|thumb|631x631px|Deadline_helper]]
** image

** [[File:Rspec for helper function.png|thumb|The result after running the rspec for the helper file]
== '''RSpec testing''' ==
There were no existing tests for the functions in due_date.rb and deadline_helper.rb. We have added a bunch of RSpec tests to test all the code. We have added two new spec files 'due_date_spec.rb' and ‘deadline_helper_spec.rb’ which cover the testing scenarios for the functions in ‘due_date.rb’ and ‘deadline_helper.rb’. For both of these two files, all Travis CI<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://travis-ci.com/|title=Travis CI - Test and Deploy with Confidence|website=travis-ci.com|access-date=2016-10-28}}</ref> test cases have passed.

These RSpec files have 100% code coverage visible at: /coverage/index.html

=== due_date_spec.rb ===
This file is located at spec/models and tests the functionalities of the due_date.rb file located in app/models. There are 18 test cases in total which are listed below.
* If the factory is successfully able to build the due_date objects.<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "due date factory created successfully" do
expect(@assignment_due_date).to be_valid
end
</syntaxhighlight><syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "due dates created correctly" do
expect(@due_dates.length).to be == 10
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* If the function "set_flag" successfully sets the due_date flag.<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "due date flag is set" do
expect(@assignment_due_date.flag).to be false
@assignment_due_date.set_flag
expect(@assignment_due_date.flag).to be true
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* If the function "due_at_is_valid_datetime" returns nil (no errors) for a valid datetime in due_at (no invalid test cases can be added here because model does not allow invalid datetime to be set at all).<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "due at is valid datetime" do
expect(@assignment_due_date.due_at_is_valid_datetime).to be nil
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* If the function "self.copy" is able to copy due dates from one assignment to another.<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "copy due dates to new assignment" do
new_assignment_id = build(:assignment, id: 999).id
old_assignment_id = @assignment_due_date.assignment.id
DueDate.copy(old_assignment_id, new_assignment_id)
expect(DueDate.where(parent_id: new_assignment_id).count).to eql DueDate.where(parent_id: old_assignment_id).count
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* If the function "self.set_duedate" is able to create another due date by copying data from an existing due date object.<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "create new duedate record with values" do
DueDate.set_duedate({id: 999}, @assignment_due_date.deadline_type_id,
@assignment_due_date.parent_id, @assignment_due_date.round)
new_due_date = DueDate.find_by(id: 999)
expect(new_due_date).to be_valid
expect(new_due_date.deadline_type_id).to eql @assignment_due_date.deadline_type_id
expect(new_due_date.parent_id).to eql @assignment_due_date.parent_id
expect(new_due_date.round).to eql @assignment_due_date.round
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* If the function "self.deadline_sort" is able to sort the due dates in ascending order.<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "sort duedate records" do
sorted_due_dates = @due_dates
expect(sorted_due_dates.each_cons(2).all?{|m1, m2| (m1.due_at <=> m2.due_at) != 1}).to eql false

sorted_due_dates = DueDate.deadline_sort(@due_dates)
expect(sorted_due_dates.each_cons(2).all?{|m1, m2| (m1.due_at <=> m2.due_at) != 1}).to eql true
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* If the function "self.done_in_assignment_round" returns the correct number of rounds for specific inputs. This involves an invalid test case as well for 0 rounds.<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
describe "#done_in_assignment_round" do
it "return 0 when no response map" do
response = ReviewResponseMap.create
response.type = "ResponseMap"
response.save
expect(DueDate.done_in_assignment_round(1, response)).to eql 0
end

it "return round 1 for single round" do
response = ReviewResponseMap.create
expect(DueDate.done_in_assignment_round(@assignment_due_date.parent_id, response)).to eql 1
end
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* If the function "self.get_next_due_date" works as expected. This involves several invalid test cases as well.<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
describe "#get_next_due_date" do
it "no subsequent due date" do
expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(@assignment_due_date.parent_id)).to be nil
end

it "nil value throws exception" do
expect { DueDate.get_next_due_date(nil) }.to raise_exception(ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound)
end

it "get next assignment due date" do
due_date = create(:assignment_due_date, deadline_type: @deadline_type,
submission_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id, review_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id,
review_of_review_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id, due_at: Time.zone.now + 5000)
expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(due_date.parent_id)).to be_valid
end

it "get next due date from topic for staggered deadline" do
assignment_id = create(:assignment, staggered_deadline: true, name: "testassignment").id
due_date = create(:topic_due_date, deadline_type: @deadline_type,
submission_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id, review_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id,
review_of_review_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id, due_at: Time.zone.now + 5000, parent_id: assignment_id)
expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(assignment_id, due_date.parent_id)).to be_valid
end

it "next due date does not exist for staggered deadline" do
assignment_id = create(:assignment, staggered_deadline: true, name: "testassignment").id
due_date = create(:topic_due_date, deadline_type: @deadline_type,
submission_allowed_id: @deadline_right, review_allowed_id: @deadline_right,
review_of_review_allowed_id: @deadline_right, due_at: Time.zone.now + 5000, parent_id: assignment_id)
expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(assignment_id)).to be nil
end

it "next due date is before Time.now for staggered deadline" do
assignment_id = create(:assignment, staggered_deadline: true, name: "testassignment").id
due_date = create(:topic_due_date, deadline_type: @deadline_type,
submission_allowed_id: @deadline_right, review_allowed_id: @deadline_right,
review_of_review_allowed_id: @deadline_right, due_at: Time.zone.now - 5000, parent_id: assignment_id)
expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(assignment_id, due_date.parent_id)).to be nil
end

it "get next due date from assignment for staggered deadline" do
assignment_id = create(:assignment, staggered_deadline: true, name: "testassignment").id
due_date = create(:assignment_due_date, deadline_type: @deadline_type,
submission_allowed_id: @deadline_right, review_allowed_id: @deadline_right,
review_of_review_allowed_id: @deadline_right, due_at: Time.zone.now + 5000, parent_id: assignment_id)
expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(assignment_id)).to be_valid
end
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* If the function "self.default_permission" returns the correct default permissions for particular deadline and permission types.<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "metareview review_of_review_allowed default permission OK" do
expect(DueDate.default_permission('metareview', 'review_of_review_allowed')).to be == DeadlineRight::OK
end
</syntaxhighlight><syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "review submission_allowed default permission NO" do
expect(DueDate.default_permission('review', 'submission_allowed')).to be == DeadlineRight::NO
end
</syntaxhighlight>
To test this file run the following command:<syntaxhighlight>
rspec spec/models/due_date_spec.rb
</syntaxhighlight>
The output of this RSpec file is present in below screenshot:

Code coverage details of the above RSpec files is present in below screenshot:
[[File:Duedatecoverage.png|center|thumb|736x736px]]


=== deadline_helper_spec.rb ===
== '''Rspec testing''' ==
This is a test file for testing the functionalities of Deadline_helper.rb file located at app/helpers. Different test cases present in this file are:
There were no existing tests for the functions in due_date.rb and deadline_helper.rb. We have added exhaustive set of RSPEC tests to test all the code. We have added two new spec file 'due_date_spec.rb' and ‘deadline_helper_spec.rb’ which covers testing scenario for the functions of  ‘Due_date.rb’ and ‘deadline_helper.rb’.
* Check if the factory<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://semaphoreci.com/community/tutorials/working-effectively-with-data-factories-using-factorygirl|title=Working Effectively with Data Factories Using FactoryGirl|website=semaphoreci.com|access-date=2016-10-28}}</ref> is valid: <syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "has a valid factory" do
factory = FactoryGirl.build(:topic_due_date)
expect(factory).to be_valid
end
</syntaxhighlight>


* Fail if the due date is invalid:<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
The testing code covers almost all the cases that needs to be checked
it "should fail because of invalid due_date" do
* Due_date_spec.rb checks
expect { DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(nil, 0, 0)}.to raise_exception(NoMethodError)
** If the flag is se
end
** If the old_assignment copied to the new_assignment
</syntaxhighlight>
** If the nil value of get_next_due_date throws an error etc


* If new due_date object is created:<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
* Deadline_helper_spec.rb checks
it "new due_date object created" do
** If Factory girl is a valid class
DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(@topic_due_date, 0, 1)
** If new due_date object is created
expect(TopicDueDate.count).to be == 2
** If the test fails throwing an exception when an invalid due_date is given
end
Run the following command for testing
</syntaxhighlight>
* rspec spec/models/Due_date_spec.rb
* due_at should be same for 0 offset:<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
The following appears
it "due_at should be same for 0 offset" do
[[File:Rspec_for_model.png|thumb|464x464px|Rspec for model]]
DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(@topic_due_date, 0, 10)
* rspec spec/models/Deadline_helper_spec.rb
new_due_date = TopicDueDate.find_by(parent_id: 10)
The following appears
expect(new_due_date).to be_valid
expect(new_due_date.due_at.to_s).to be == @topic_due_date.due_at.to_s
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* due_at is calculated correctly if offset is positive:<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "due_at calculated correctly for positive offset" do
DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(@topic_due_date, 5000, 10)
new_due_date = TopicDueDate.find_by(parent_id: 10)
expect(new_due_date).to be_valid
expect(new_due_date.due_at.to_s).to be == (Time.zone.parse(@topic_due_date.due_at.to_s) + 5000).to_s
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* due_at is calculated correctly if offset is negative:<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "due_at calculated correctly for negative offset" do
DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(@topic_due_date, -5000, 10)
new_due_date = TopicDueDate.find_by(parent_id: 10)
expect(new_due_date).to be_valid
expect(new_due_date.due_at.to_s).to be == (Time.zone.parse(@topic_due_date.due_at.to_s) - 5000).to_s
end
</syntaxhighlight>
* The offset is being converted to integer properly:<syntaxhighlight lang="ruby">
it "offset converted to integer correctly" do
DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(@topic_due_date, 5000.15, 10)
new_due_date = TopicDueDate.find_by(parent_id: 10)
expect(new_due_date).to be_valid
expect(new_due_date.due_at.to_s).to be == (Time.zone.parse(@topic_due_date.due_at.to_s) + 5000).to_s
end
</syntaxhighlight>
To test this file run the following command:<syntaxhighlight>
rspec spec/models/deadline_helper_spec.rb
</syntaxhighlight>The output of this RSpec file is present in below screenshot:
[[File:Deadlinerspec.png|center|thumb|705x705px]]


Code coverage details of the above RSpec files is present in below screenshot:
//screenshot
[[File:Deadlinecoverage.png|center|thumb|823x823px]]


== '''References''' ==
== '''References''' ==

Latest revision as of 06:49, 21 April 2023

Introduction

[edit]

Expertiza

[edit]

Expertiza[1] is an open source project for school assignment management for instructors and students based on the Ruby on Rails[2] framework. Expertiza allows the instructor to create new assignments and customize new or existing assignments. It also allows the instructor to create a list of topics the students can sign up for. Students can form teams in Expertiza to work on various projects and assignments. Students can also peer review other students' submissions. Expertiza supports submission across various document types, including the URLs and word documents. Expertiza provides a dashboard for all the assignments corresponding to a course and provides absolute control to the Instructors and Teaching Assistants. In addition to assignments, it encompasses peer reviews wherein participants are allowed to provide feedback anonymously about each other's work thereby providing scope for the better outcome. The due_date.rb file is responsible for informing the users about the deadline for submission of the each assignment. Due dates in Expertiza have their association with many other components like assignments, reviews etc.

Code Climate

[edit]

Code Climate[3] is a tool that runs static analysis on a GitHub project and outputs many details like test coverage, complexity, duplication, security, style, and more. There is a Google Chrome extension to integrate the Code Climate results generated directly into GitHub which is visible when browsing the repository on the browser. It allows us to see issues displayed directly inside GitHub's UI, to review which lines are covered in diffs and files, and add repositories and open tickets without changing your workflow.

Tasks Identified

[edit]

To install Code climate Chrome Extension that highlights the duplicated code.

To refactor the following two files:

  • Due_date.rb
    • Ternary operators must not be nested. Prefer `if` or `else` constructs instead.
    • Useless assignment to variable - `sorted_deadlines`.
    • Prefer `each` over `for`.
    • Use `find_by` instead of `where.first`.
    • Correct the use of Time function
  • Deadline_helper.rb
    • Do not use `Time.now` without zone. Use one of `Time.zone.now`, `Time.current`, `Time.now.in_time_zone`, `Time.now.utc`, `Time.now.getlocal`, `Time.now.iso8601`, `Time.now.jisx0301`, `Time.now.rfc3339`, `Time.now.to_i`, `Time.now.to_f` instead.
    • Trailing whitespace detected.
    • Extra empty line detected at module body end.
  • Create respective RSpec[4] files in /spec/models/ and /spec/helpers folder and write unit tests for each method in due_date.rb and deadline_helper.rb.

Current Implementation

[edit]

DueDate is a Model class to manage the deadlines of an assignment. It has methods for setting due dates for an assignment, copying due dates from one assignment to a new assignment etc. DeadlineHelper provides helper functions that help DueDate perform certain tasks. The assignment focuses on refactoring some of the methods based on warnings received from Code Climate's static analysis and modifying the language to make it more Ruby-friendly. The assignment also involves writing unit test cases for due_date.rb and deadline_helper.rb in order to increase test coverage.

The goal of this project is to attempt to make this part of the application easier to read and write unit test cases that the application must pass.

Changed Implementation

[edit]

Changes implemented involves refactoring the code and making it more understandable by adding comments in the code.

The modified files are

  • Due_date.rb (path: /app/models)
  • Deadline_helper.rb (path: /app/helpers)

Testing files

  • Due_date_spec.rb (path: /spec/models)
  • Deadline_helper_spec.rb (path: /spec/helpers)

Due_date.rb

[edit]
  • Converted for..in loop to object.each in order to follow better Ruby syntax.
  • Unnecessary assignment to sorted_deadlines removed.
  • Nested ternary operators have been changed to if..else in order to make it more readable.
    • Due_date.rb
  • Changed where(...).first to find_by(...) which is the newer recommended syntax.
  • Corrected the Time.now functions by adding the correct zones to them such as Time.zone.now.
  • Removed trailing white spaces.

Deadline_helper.rb

[edit]
  • Time functions were changed to functions with zones
  • Extra line removed
Deadline_helper

RSpec testing

[edit]

There were no existing tests for the functions in due_date.rb and deadline_helper.rb. We have added a bunch of RSpec tests to test all the code. We have added two new spec files 'due_date_spec.rb' and ‘deadline_helper_spec.rb’ which cover the testing scenarios for the functions in ‘due_date.rb’ and ‘deadline_helper.rb’. For both of these two files, all Travis CI[5] test cases have passed.

These RSpec files have 100% code coverage visible at: /coverage/index.html

due_date_spec.rb

[edit]

This file is located at spec/models and tests the functionalities of the due_date.rb file located in app/models. There are 18 test cases in total which are listed below.

  • If the factory is successfully able to build the due_date objects.
    it "due date factory created successfully" do
        expect(@assignment_due_date).to be_valid
    end
    
    it "due dates created correctly" do
        expect(@due_dates.length).to be == 10
    end
    
  • If the function "set_flag" successfully sets the due_date flag.
    it "due date flag is set" do
        expect(@assignment_due_date.flag).to be false
        @assignment_due_date.set_flag
        expect(@assignment_due_date.flag).to be true
    end
    
  • If the function "due_at_is_valid_datetime" returns nil (no errors) for a valid datetime in due_at (no invalid test cases can be added here because model does not allow invalid datetime to be set at all).
    it "due at is valid datetime" do
        expect(@assignment_due_date.due_at_is_valid_datetime).to be nil
    end
    
  • If the function "self.copy" is able to copy due dates from one assignment to another.
    it "copy due dates to new assignment" do
        new_assignment_id = build(:assignment, id: 999).id
        old_assignment_id = @assignment_due_date.assignment.id
        DueDate.copy(old_assignment_id, new_assignment_id)
        expect(DueDate.where(parent_id: new_assignment_id).count).to eql DueDate.where(parent_id: old_assignment_id).count
    end
    
  • If the function "self.set_duedate" is able to create another due date by copying data from an existing due date object.
    it "create new duedate record with values" do
        DueDate.set_duedate({id: 999}, @assignment_due_date.deadline_type_id,
                            @assignment_due_date.parent_id, @assignment_due_date.round)
        new_due_date = DueDate.find_by(id: 999)
        expect(new_due_date).to be_valid
        expect(new_due_date.deadline_type_id).to eql @assignment_due_date.deadline_type_id
        expect(new_due_date.parent_id).to eql @assignment_due_date.parent_id
        expect(new_due_date.round).to eql @assignment_due_date.round
    end
    
  • If the function "self.deadline_sort" is able to sort the due dates in ascending order.
    it "sort duedate records" do
        sorted_due_dates = @due_dates
        expect(sorted_due_dates.each_cons(2).all?{|m1, m2| (m1.due_at <=> m2.due_at) != 1}).to eql false
    
        sorted_due_dates = DueDate.deadline_sort(@due_dates)
        expect(sorted_due_dates.each_cons(2).all?{|m1, m2| (m1.due_at <=> m2.due_at) != 1}).to eql true
    end
    
  • If the function "self.done_in_assignment_round" returns the correct number of rounds for specific inputs. This involves an invalid test case as well for 0 rounds.
    describe "#done_in_assignment_round" do
        it "return 0 when no response map" do
          response = ReviewResponseMap.create
          response.type = "ResponseMap"
          response.save
          expect(DueDate.done_in_assignment_round(1, response)).to eql 0
        end
    
        it "return round 1 for single round" do
          response = ReviewResponseMap.create
          expect(DueDate.done_in_assignment_round(@assignment_due_date.parent_id, response)).to eql 1
        end
    end
    
  • If the function "self.get_next_due_date" works as expected. This involves several invalid test cases as well.
    describe "#get_next_due_date" do
        it "no subsequent due date" do
          expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(@assignment_due_date.parent_id)).to be nil
        end
    
        it "nil value throws exception" do
          expect { DueDate.get_next_due_date(nil) }.to raise_exception(ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound)
        end
    
        it "get next assignment due date" do
          due_date = create(:assignment_due_date, deadline_type: @deadline_type,
            submission_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id, review_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id,
            review_of_review_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id, due_at: Time.zone.now + 5000)
          expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(due_date.parent_id)).to be_valid
        end
    
        it "get next due date from topic for staggered deadline" do
          assignment_id = create(:assignment, staggered_deadline: true, name: "testassignment").id
          due_date = create(:topic_due_date, deadline_type: @deadline_type,
            submission_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id, review_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id,
            review_of_review_allowed_id: @deadline_right.id, due_at: Time.zone.now + 5000, parent_id: assignment_id)
          expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(assignment_id, due_date.parent_id)).to be_valid
        end
    
        it "next due date does not exist for staggered deadline" do
          assignment_id = create(:assignment, staggered_deadline: true, name: "testassignment").id
          due_date = create(:topic_due_date, deadline_type: @deadline_type,
            submission_allowed_id: @deadline_right, review_allowed_id: @deadline_right,
            review_of_review_allowed_id: @deadline_right, due_at: Time.zone.now + 5000, parent_id: assignment_id)
          expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(assignment_id)).to be nil
        end
    
        it "next due date is before Time.now for staggered deadline" do
          assignment_id = create(:assignment, staggered_deadline: true, name: "testassignment").id
          due_date = create(:topic_due_date, deadline_type: @deadline_type,
            submission_allowed_id: @deadline_right, review_allowed_id: @deadline_right,
            review_of_review_allowed_id: @deadline_right, due_at: Time.zone.now - 5000, parent_id: assignment_id)
          expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(assignment_id, due_date.parent_id)).to be nil
        end
    
        it "get next due date from assignment for staggered deadline" do
          assignment_id = create(:assignment, staggered_deadline: true, name: "testassignment").id
          due_date = create(:assignment_due_date, deadline_type: @deadline_type,
            submission_allowed_id: @deadline_right, review_allowed_id: @deadline_right,
            review_of_review_allowed_id: @deadline_right, due_at: Time.zone.now + 5000, parent_id: assignment_id)
          expect(DueDate.get_next_due_date(assignment_id)).to be_valid
        end
    end
    
  • If the function "self.default_permission" returns the correct default permissions for particular deadline and permission types.
    it "metareview review_of_review_allowed default permission OK" do
        expect(DueDate.default_permission('metareview', 'review_of_review_allowed')).to be == DeadlineRight::OK
    end
    
    it "review submission_allowed default permission NO" do
        expect(DueDate.default_permission('review', 'submission_allowed')).to be == DeadlineRight::NO
    end
    

To test this file run the following command:

rspec spec/models/due_date_spec.rb

The output of this RSpec file is present in below screenshot:

Code coverage details of the above RSpec files is present in below screenshot:

deadline_helper_spec.rb

[edit]

This is a test file for testing the functionalities of Deadline_helper.rb file located at app/helpers. Different test cases present in this file are:

  • Check if the factory[6] is valid:
    it "has a valid factory" do
        factory = FactoryGirl.build(:topic_due_date)
        expect(factory).to be_valid
    end
    
  • Fail if the due date is invalid:
    it "should fail because of invalid due_date" do
          expect { DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(nil, 0, 0)}.to raise_exception(NoMethodError)
    end
    
  • If new due_date object is created:
    it "new due_date object created" do
          DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(@topic_due_date, 0, 1)
          expect(TopicDueDate.count).to be == 2
    end
    
  • due_at should be same for 0 offset:
     it "due_at should be same for 0 offset" do
          DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(@topic_due_date, 0, 10)
          new_due_date = TopicDueDate.find_by(parent_id: 10)
          expect(new_due_date).to be_valid
          expect(new_due_date.due_at.to_s).to be == @topic_due_date.due_at.to_s
    end
    
  • due_at is calculated correctly if offset is positive:
    it "due_at calculated correctly for positive offset" do
          DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(@topic_due_date, 5000, 10)
          new_due_date = TopicDueDate.find_by(parent_id: 10)
          expect(new_due_date).to be_valid
          expect(new_due_date.due_at.to_s).to be == (Time.zone.parse(@topic_due_date.due_at.to_s) + 5000).to_s
    end
    
  • due_at is calculated correctly if offset is negative:
    it "due_at calculated correctly for negative offset" do
          DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(@topic_due_date, -5000, 10)
          new_due_date = TopicDueDate.find_by(parent_id: 10)
          expect(new_due_date).to be_valid
          expect(new_due_date.due_at.to_s).to be == (Time.zone.parse(@topic_due_date.due_at.to_s) - 5000).to_s
    end
    
  • The offset is being converted to integer properly:
    it "offset converted to integer correctly" do
          DeadlineHelper.create_topic_deadline(@topic_due_date, 5000.15, 10)
          new_due_date = TopicDueDate.find_by(parent_id: 10)
          expect(new_due_date).to be_valid
          expect(new_due_date.due_at.to_s).to be == (Time.zone.parse(@topic_due_date.due_at.to_s) + 5000).to_s
    end
    

To test this file run the following command:

rspec spec/models/deadline_helper_spec.rb

The output of this RSpec file is present in below screenshot:

Code coverage details of the above RSpec files is present in below screenshot:

References

[edit]
  1. ^ https://expertiza.ncsu.edu/. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. ^ "Ruby on Rails". rubyonrails.org. Retrieved 2016-10-28.
  3. ^ "Log in to your Code Climate dashboard with GitHub or your email". codeclimate.com. Retrieved 2016-10-28.
  4. ^ "RSpec: Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby". rspec.info. Retrieved 2016-10-28.
  5. ^ "Travis CI - Test and Deploy with Confidence". travis-ci.com. Retrieved 2016-10-28.
  6. ^ "Working Effectively with Data Factories Using FactoryGirl". semaphoreci.com. Retrieved 2016-10-28.