Talk:Tupolev Tu-80/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m remove div tag |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
#'''Overall''': |
#'''Overall''': |
||
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
||
#:: {{#if:{{{7com|}}}|{{{7com}}}|}}<!-- Template:GAList -- |
#:: {{#if:{{{7com|}}}|{{{7com}}}|}}<!-- Template:GAList --> |
||
=== Comments === |
=== Comments === |
||
Latest revision as of 18:58, 22 April 2023
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose:
(MoS):
- prose:
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]1. and adding fuel capacity. Suggest - and a higher fuel capacity.
2. and a top speed of 620 km/h (390 mph). Suggest - and have a top speed of 620 km/h (390 mph).
- I've reworded both, see how you like them now. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Nice work Strum. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)