User talk:SharabSalam: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:SharabSalam/Archive 5) (bot |
||
(25 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| minthreadsleft = 0 |
| minthreadsleft = 0 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Usertalksuper}} |
|||
== FYI == |
|||
Having investigated this history of additions of the "religion of peace" blog, I've successfully proposed blacklisting it. So we won't be seeing that particular sewer again. '''[[user:JzG|Guy]]''' <small>([[user talk:JzG|help!]])</small> 10:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== Concerning your edit here: == |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Mauritania&type=revision&diff=960021857&oldid=960018419 |
|||
I have made a talk page discussion on the above article here per your request: |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mauritania |
|||
[[User:DeathTrain|DeathTrain]] ([[User talk:DeathTrain|talk]]) 01:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== Surah edits == |
|||
Hope all is well in retirement. If reading this, just wanted to point out that undoing Koreangauteng's disruptive edits has made some headway but issues still remain. For example 14 out of 176 verses are selectively cited in Surah Al Nisa [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An-Nisa]] without any particular rationale ,notability or secondary source discussion, most if not all of them added by him. As with Al-Baqarah they should be removed but I am personally hesitant to take such a bold measure considering certain resistance on even clearly justified removals (see edit history on Al Nisa).[[Special:Contributions/39.37.185.58|39.37.185.58]] ([[User talk:39.37.185.58|talk]]) 18:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 07:02, 27 April 2023
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.