User talk:Giltsbeach: Difference between revisions
→May 2023: new section |
Declining unblock request (unblock-review) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== May 2023 == |
== May 2023 == |
||
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' |
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' indefinitely from editing for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock --> |
||
:This block is the result of the conversation at [[WP:ANI]]. You need to completely change your approach to editing if you want to return. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 19:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |
:This block is the result of the conversation at [[WP:ANI]]. You need to completely change your approach to editing if you want to return. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 19:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
: |
|||
{{unblock reviewed|decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that |
|||
*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, <em>or</em> |
|||
*the block is no longer necessary because you |
|||
*#understand what you have been blocked for, |
|||
*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and |
|||
*#will make useful contributions instead. |
|||
Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Jpgordon|--jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇]]</small></sup> 05:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)|1=You guys are weird af. You really think people join Wikipedia to read policies and take part in months-long discussions about infobox guidelines? You seriously think that is normal? And it "scares you" that I rather just get to editing and improving the articles I care about rather than take part in your bureaucratic hellscape? You let an editor harass and troll me for a month, no one would help when I sought intervention, and then you blocked me in the dead of night because I dared to ask for help in the first place? Yeah, I'm good. You guys really did earn your reputation. Good luck.}} [[User:Giltsbeach|Giltsbeach]] ([[User talk:Giltsbeach#top|talk]]) 02:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:55, 5 May 2023
Courtesy notification
[edit]I've started a section at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#Information in infobox, not in article, again: Heraldic tinctures. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
New message from Serial Number 54129
[edit]Message added 12:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SN54129 12:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yngvadottir (talk) 11:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. - This block is the result of the conversation at WP:ANI. You need to completely change your approach to editing if you want to return. Cullen328 (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Giltsbeach (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You guys are weird af. You really think people join Wikipedia to read policies and take part in months-long discussions about infobox guidelines? You seriously think that is normal? And it "scares you" that I rather just get to editing and improving the articles I care about rather than take part in your bureaucratic hellscape? You let an editor harass and troll me for a month, no one would help when I sought intervention, and then you blocked me in the dead of night because I dared to ask for help in the first place? Yeah, I'm good. You guys really did earn your reputation. Good luck.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 05:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.