Jump to content

User talk:Kbabej: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Restored revision 1145474134 by FastilyBot (talk)
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archives}}
{{Archives}}
== Blocked for sockpuppetry ==
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|abusing multiple accounts]]&#32;per the evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kbabej]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but '''not for ''[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Edits by and on behalf of banned editors|reverted]] or [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|deleted]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;--[[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]] ([[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]]) 15:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock -->


== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Bernadette (tiger)]] ==
== [[Bruce Schroeder]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]


The article [[:Bernadette (tiger)]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
If you observe, virtually the same sentence as what you wrote in [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bruce_Schroeder&oldid=prev&diff=1056078868 this diff] in the [[Bruce_Schroeder#Judicial_career]] section where it says "Schroeder came to national attention in 2021 while presiding over the Kyle Rittenhouse trial". I would also advise of [[WP:BRD]]. When and edit has been reverted, the generally accepted action isn't to re-revert and engage in discussion via edit summaries. Please see [[WP:BRD]]. Thank you, --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 19:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''Individual tiger that lacks [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:SIGCOV]].'''</blockquote>
:{{reply to|Hammersoft}} It's stunningly obvious the judge only became notable because of the trial. His article didn't even exist until a few days ago. To not mention it in the lead goes against all common sense. I would encourage you to review [[WP:COMMON]]. If you believe the sentence duplication isn't ideal, then edit the sentence. --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 19:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
:: Sure. Then pick one. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 20:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)


While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Bernadette (tiger)|the article's talk page]].
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the [[Help:Introduction to navigating Wikipedia/4|history]] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, [[User:FastilyBot|FastilyBot]] ([[User talk:FastilyBot|talk]]) 10:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1056563328 -->

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Bobbi Kristina Brown]] ==
The article [[Bobbi Kristina Brown]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[File:Symbol support vote.svg|20px|link=]]; see [[Talk:Bobbi Kristina Brown]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a '''bold link''' under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:David Fuchs|David Fuchs]]</small> -- [[User:David Fuchs|David Fuchs]] ([[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]) 21:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
: Congrats! ---[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])</sub> 21:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

==DYK nomination of Bobbi Kristina Brown==
[[File:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Bobbi Kristina Brown]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Bobbi Kristina Brown|your nomination's entry]]''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Therapyisgood|Therapyisgood]] ([[User talk:Therapyisgood|talk]]) 16:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

== Merry Christmas Kbabej! ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[image:wikisanta.jpg|150x100px|left]]

[[User:Ganesha811|Ganesha811]] ([[User talk:Ganesha811|talk]]) is wishing you a [[Mary Poppins|Merry]] [[Christmas]]! This greeting (and season) promotes [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a [[Christmas|Merry Christmas]], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! <br />

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{[[WP:SUBST|subst]]:[[User:Flaming/MC2008]]}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
</div>

==Sealand==
Please stop pushing an agenda about Sealand. Whatever you or I might think about it, the FACTS are that this is NOT a sovereign country or even a partially recognised one. It's the project of one family. Simply calling yourself royalty does not make it true. Also, your comment that Michael Bates is not a self-proclaimed prince is inaccurate. His father was not in a position to bestow a royal title, so even if he did 'declare' his son the Prince of Sealand, it's meaningless. Michael Bates is still trying to claim the title as legitimate, therefore he is self-proclaimed. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C7:8905:CC01:791F:C50E:DD44:B86|2A00:23C7:8905:CC01:791F:C50E:DD44:B86]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C7:8905:CC01:791F:C50E:DD44:B86|talk]]) 11:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

== GOCE review of [[Comedian (artwork)|''Comedian'' (artwork)]] ==

{{GOCEtb|article=Comedian (artwork)|sign=[[User:Tdslk|Tdslk]] ([[User talk:Tdslk|talk]]) 04:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)}}
:{{reply to|Tdslk}} Thank you! Much appreciated. Hope you are having a good holiday season. --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 17:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

==DYK for Bobbi Kristina Brown==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions/2022/January#5 January 2022|5 January 2022]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Bobbi Kristina Brown]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''[[Bobbi Kristina Brown]]''' died less than four years after her mother [[Whitney Houston]] died in similar circumstances?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bobbi Kristina Brown]]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2021-12-26&end=2022-01-15&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Bobbi_Kristina_Brown Bobbi Kristina Brown])</small>, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]]. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 12:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

:{{DYK views|12,385.5|1,032.1|January 2022}} [[User:Theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Theleekycauldron|contribs]]) ([[Singular they|they]]/she) 08:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
::{{reply to|theleekycauldron}} Oh, that's very cool! Thanks for the update. --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 15:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
:::Congrats! Great work on the GA and the DYK nomination. [[User:Bruxton|Bruxton]] ([[User talk:Bruxton|talk]]) 20:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
::::{{reply to|Bruxton}} Thanks! And thank you for the review and help. It was my first DYK nom (and third non-joint GA) and it was great to see it come to fruition. Hope you're well! --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 21:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Comedian (artwork)]] ==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Comedian (artwork)]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[File:Time2wait.svg|20px|link=]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:GhostRiver|GhostRiver]]</small> -- [[User:GhostRiver|GhostRiver]] ([[User talk:GhostRiver|talk]]) 18:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:{{reply to|GhostRiver}} thank you! Very much appreciated. I am willing to make any needed changes to get this to GA status. --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 17:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Comedian (artwork)]] ==
The article [[Comedian (artwork)]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[File:Symbol wait.svg|20px|link=]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See [[Talk:Comedian (artwork)]] for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:GhostRiver|GhostRiver]]</small> -- [[User:GhostRiver|GhostRiver]] ([[User talk:GhostRiver|talk]]) 17:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Comedian (artwork)]] ==
The article [[Comedian (artwork)]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[File:Symbol support vote.svg|20px|link=]]; see [[Talk:Comedian (artwork)]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a '''bold link''' under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:GhostRiver|GhostRiver]]</small> -- [[User:GhostRiver|GhostRiver]] ([[User talk:GhostRiver|talk]]) 00:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

:Congrats! ---[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])</sub> 01:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

== Please stop reverting cited edits in the "Sealand" page. ==

I am unsure of why you hold such strong views on Sealand and Michael Bates, that you are trying to, falsely, portray that it is a legitimate nation state or that Michael Bates has any legitimate royal titles, but Sealand is wholly unrecognized by every sovereign state. It is unrecognized, and by the way, "micronation" does not automatically mean unrecognized. Take Andorra, an internationally recognized state in Iberia, which is referred to as a micronation not because of its recognition but because of its geographic size. I do not want this situation to devolve into edit warring so I kindly ask you to stop doing this. I am apparently not the first to try to address this, by the way. [[User:Chastizement|Chastizement]] ([[User talk:Chastizement|talk]]) 22:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

==DYK for Comedian (artwork)==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions/2022/January#28 January 2022|28 January 2022]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Comedian (artwork)]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the artwork '''''[[Comedian (artwork)|Comedian]]''''', a fresh banana taped to a wall with duct tape, sold for $120,000 in 2019?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Comedian (artwork)]]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2022-01-18&end=2022-02-07&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Comedian_(artwork) Comedian (artwork)])</small>, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]]. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 00:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

==Jacqueline Jackson==

{{reply to|user:Kbabej}} I am copyediting [[Jacqueline Jackson]] (a fascinating woman) and have a question. Is the Peace & Justice Award from Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/Push Coalition? There's a paywall on the citation. Thanks. [[User:Cleveland Todd|Cleveland Todd]] ([[User talk:Cleveland Todd|talk]]) 20:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
:{{reply to|user:Cleveland Todd}} Hello! Thank you for taking this on. Much appreciated. Yes, I believe the award is from that organization. --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 20:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
::{{reply to|user:Kbabej}} Re: "Done" template. Kbabelj Yes. I put the "done" template on the article up on 2/15. [[User:Cleveland Todd|Cleveland Todd]] ([[User talk:Cleveland Todd|talk]]) 13:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

== Sayali Sanjiv ==

Hello sir, Network of these people is very big

*Amitbhb12 - [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amitbhb12/Archive]]

*Amitbhb12 - Akshay Bardapurkar [https://twitter.com/amitbhb07/status/813469569633439745?t=vg4cCb4L2mk4wa7shzb-ug&s=19]
*Akshay Bardapurkar - Planet Marathi [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Marathi OTT]]
*Planet Marathi - Sayali Sanjiv [https://twitter.com/PlanetTalentM/status/1255457296915800067?t=dQaxu9pFpFahixwrbazVMQ&s=19] [[User:Cinzia007|Cinzia007]] ([[User talk:Cinzia007|talk]]) 22:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

== I have sent you a note about a page you started ==

Hello, Kbabej

Thank you for creating [[Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels]].

[[User:North8000]], while examining this page as a part of our [[WP:NPP|page curation process]], had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=nice work}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>North8000<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>}} .

<small>(Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

<b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 21:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

:Thank you @[[User:North8000|North8000]]! Very much appreciated! --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 21:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Original Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hi Kbabej, thank you, thank you, THANK YOU for expanding and putting context to [[Millie Bobby Brown]]'s personal life. [[User:S0091|S0091]] ([[User talk:S0091|talk]]) 23:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
|}

:Thank you @[[User:S0091|S0091]]! Much appreciated. It looks like it's been reverted by a new editor who is misapplying [[Wikipedia:Writing about women|WP:WAW]], which is actually an essay and not policy. Even if it were policy, I believe the information added is from green-level RS from [[WP:RSP]]. There's a discussion on the talk page [[Talk:Millie Bobby Brown|here]], but the section has been reverted and the editor has not responded to my points. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts one way or another. --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 19:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

== [[Sam Asghari]] ==

There is [[Draft:Sam Asghari]], could you please transfer select content from that to the main article? <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">[[User:Kailash29792|<b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b>]] [[User talk:Kailash29792|<span style="color: black;">(talk)</span>]] </span> 03:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

:Hello @[[User:Kailash29792|Kailash29792]]! Will work on this! --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 00:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

== [[J. K. Rowling]] ==
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->
[[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
: Just noting [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kbabej&diff=1095030125&oldid=1095029954 this was not a repeat]; the article is under double sanctions (BLP and gender). [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
::Oh, oops, I didn't read it that closely (obviously). I'll reinstate! Thanks! --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 00:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Jason Moore (writer)]] has been accepted ==
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; width: 90%;">[[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]] '''[[Jason Moore (writer)]], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''B-Class''', which is recorded on its [[Talk:Jason Moore (writer)|talk page]]. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/B percentage}} of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Grading scheme|grading scheme]] to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now [[Wikipedia:Your first article|create articles yourself]] without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Jason_Moore_(writer) help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to [[Wikipedia:Your first article|create articles yourself]] without posting a request to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]].</span>

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
— [[User:Bilorv|Bilorv]] ('''[[User talk:Bilorv|<span style="color:purple">talk</span>]]''') 19:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk-->

== More than a wolf whistle ==

The information is extremely pertinent to the discussion on this Wikipedia topic.
Everything that was stated is neutral in content and is completely sourced..the only reason to remove the information is to provide a false narrative that Mrs. Bryant is somehow to be blamed for the actions that befell emmett till when she has been found innocent in multiple investigations [[Special:Contributions/2600:1003:B84C:F797:71CD:6335:DF23:898F|2600:1003:B84C:F797:71CD:6335:DF23:898F]] ([[User talk:2600:1003:B84C:F797:71CD:6335:DF23:898F|talk]]) 15:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

:Hello @[[User:2600:1003:B84C:F797:71CD:6335:DF23:898F|2600:1003:B84C:F797:71CD:6335:DF23:898F]]. I agree the information is pertinent, which is why it's already been included in the page. What you've added is redundant, and formatted incorrectly. Your addition states:
:{{Blockquote|text=Mr.Tyson received an unpublished memoir from Carolyn Bryant Donham which he made an agreement to have held for release until 2036. An agreement with Donham and historian Timothy Tyson at the University of North Carolina, An agreement that he violated stating " I decided that if there was going to be a re-investigation, that criminal justice outweighs the archival agreement," Tyson tells CNN. There was no reinvestigation "There’s no new evidence to open the case back up,” Michelle Williams, chief of staff for Attorney General Lynn Fitch, told The Associated Press.}}
:That's already all covered. The agreement and the 2036 planned release date are already in the lead. The fact Tyson released the book is in the lead, and the fact it was held at UNC and that Tyson violated the agreement is in the 'Background' section. As is his quote. Nothing you've added isn't ready in the article. Were you meaning to add other information? --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 15:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

==DYK for Generation Drag==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions/2022/July#20 July 2022|20 July 2022]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Generation Drag]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that model [[Tyra Banks]] produces '''''[[Generation Drag]]''''', a TV series which follows five children preparing for a drag show?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Generation Drag]]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2022-07-10&end=2022-07-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Generation_Drag Generation Drag])</small>, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]]. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 00:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

== More than a wolf whistle 2 ==

find it amusing how you choose to hide any negativity about this man deep inside the wiki pages and only present the accomplishments he has attained in his introduction. How can you feel that his lying to carolyn bryant donham about sealing her memoir until 2036 with UNC and then turning around and releasing it to the media just because HE DECIDED ON HIS ON that it had some sort of revelation in it that would make the world find her guilty ? This man has lied in order to sell his book by saying that Ms Donham recanted her story but had no proof to prove it..and now he has lied in order to obtain her memoir...I believe any analytical person would feel that these examples are worthy of total and complete front page coverage! But Wikipedia as well as Twitter ,Facebook and many other liberal controlled sites choose to censor and distort the information into a narrative that fits the policies they want to push. Ms.Donham is a white woman and she was whistled at by a Black individual in the Jim Crow south..this is a PROVEN fact. Emmett Till was horribly murdered and ATLEAST TWO of the white men that did it got off free in an unjust trail...also the truth. But to vilify Ms. Donham in order to profit and to say that she must pay just because she is white is unjust as well. [[Special:Contributions/2600:1003:B84A:6ABE:B4DD:CE6:CC7:7163|2600:1003:B84A:6ABE:B4DD:CE6:CC7:7163]] ([[User talk:2600:1003:B84A:6ABE:B4DD:CE6:CC7:7163|talk]]) 11:11, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

:Hello. I'm not sure what you're asking for here. The book's article, ''[[I Am More Than a Wolf Whistle]]'', covers the fact that the historian leaked the book early in the lead, and in the article body as well under 'Background', along with his reasoning for leaking it. When you say "he has lied", I haven't seen any reliable sources state that. If you have any, please let me know and I can incorporate them. When you say WP has "chose[n] to censor and distort the information into a narrative that fits the polies they want to push", I'm also not sure what you're referring to. The book, the leak, and the reception are covered as thoroughly as possible. Again, if you have any reliable sources that would change the facts, please let me know. Cheers! --[[User:Kbabej|Kbabej]] ([[User talk:Kbabej#top|talk]]) 15:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

== Wolf Whistle 3 ==

If you would bother to read the link that I have been adding you would see what the matters at hand are. Wiki has no problem putting the statement that Ms. Donham recanted her story to Mr Tyson front and center ! But when the truth is pointed out that
she DID NOT recant her story then you want to hide that and say it's not part of the big picture.
Personally I feel the idea that you can allow a man such as Mr.Tyson to state that she lied and he has proof...when the only "proof " that he has is his own hand written notes because he " forgot to record that part of the interview " is really the big picture!
Since when have we taken the word of one person as the truth and another person's as a lie just because we like the narrative that it leads us to ?
The article that is linked is even titled Donham lied...did Tyson lie to ?
Who are any of us to question that what Ms.Donham said was not the truth ?..we were not there and we most likely will never know...but just because Mr Tyson scribbled
" she lied ..that parts not true " doesn't make his statement the truth. [[Special:Contributions/2600:1003:B859:DA73:98A0:695A:7B88:4301|2600:1003:B859:DA73:98A0:695A:7B88:4301]] ([[User talk:2600:1003:B859:DA73:98A0:695A:7B88:4301|talk]]) 13:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

:IP range blocked for 3 days for multiple blp violations. Let me know if they return. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 13:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:38, 20 May 2023

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kbabej. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 15:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Bernadette (tiger) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Individual tiger that lacks WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]