Geschwind–Galaburda hypothesis: Difference between revisions
Witch Hazell (talk | contribs) |
SimLibrarian (talk | contribs) Adding short description: "Neurological theory" |
||
| (28 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Neurological theory}} |
|||
The '''Geschwind–Galaburda hypothesis''' was proposed by [[Norman Geschwind]] and Albert Galaburda to explain [[Biology of gender|sex differences]] in [[cognition|cognitive]] abilities by relating them to [[Lateralization of brain function]]. The basic idea is that differences in maturation rates between the [[cerebral hemispheres]] are mediated by circulating [[Androgen|testosterone]] levels, and that sexual maturation acts to fix the hemispheres at different relative stages of development after [[puberty]]. |
|||
{{multiple issues| |
|||
{{more footnotes needed|date=October 2013}} |
|||
{{Primary sources|date=March 2021}} |
|||
}} |
|||
The '''Geschwind–Galaburda hypothesis''' is a neurological theory proposed by Norman Geschwind and Albert Galaburda in 1987.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal | vauthors = McManus IC, Bryden MP | title = Geschwind's theory of cerebral lateralization: developing a formal, causal model | journal = Psychological Bulletin | volume = 110 | issue = 2 | pages = 237–253 | date = September 1991 | pmid = 1946868 | doi = 10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.237 }}</ref> The hypothesis posits there are sex differences in cognitive abilities by relating them to lateralisation of brain function.<ref name=":0" /> The maturation rates of cerebral hemispheres differ and are mediated by circuiting testosterone levels, which are substantially influenced during the foetal and post-puberty development stages.<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
According to the hypothesis, testosterone delays the maturation of the brain, particularly the left hemisphere, resulting in corresponding regions of the right hemisphere and unaffected areas of the left hemisphere developing more rapidly.<ref name=":0" /> This leads to reduced verbal skills and an increased risk of developing language disorders, e.g dyslexia, while a rapid development of the right hemisphere and the skills corresponding to it, such as attention and problem-solving.<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
According to the theory, male brains mature later than females, and the left hemisphere matures later than the right. |
|||
Focusing on foetal testosterone, the rise in levels hinders the development of the individual’s neurology and immunity, potentially explaining how cerebral lateralisation links to learning disorders, giftedness, and immune deficits.<ref name=":0" /> In cases of an underdeveloped or functionally impaired left hemisphere, the neuroanatomical asymmetries may lead to compensatory activity in other areas of the brain.<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Although the Geschwind-Galaburda hypothesis has been cited in mainstream media and publication resources, it should be noted that very little research evidence (if any) has been presented to substantiate the theory. In fact, evidence has emerged suggesting that high prenatal estrogen exposure is more likely to enhance the gene expression for left-handedness. In a study endorsed by the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centers_for_Disease_Control_and_Prevention Centers for Disease Control] (CDC), it is suggested that men who were prenatally exposed to [[Diethylstilbestrol|diethylstilbestrol]] (a synthetic estrogen based fertility drug), are more likely to be left handed.<ref>{{cite news|last=Titus-Ernstoff et al|title=Psychosexual Characteristics of Men and Women Exposed Prenatally to Diethylstilbestrol|url=http://www.cdc.gov/des/consumers/research/recent_psychosexual.html|date=2003}}</ref> This has been confirmed with animal studies. |
|||
The field of “neuropsychology of individual differences” is concerned with the understanding the relationship between brain lateralisation and behaviour variation. In their work, Geschwind and Galaburda proposed that in order to explain the differences in cognitive abilities, it is dependent on prenatal exposure to testosterone.<ref name=":0" /> This comprehensive theoretical framework links the association between brain development, testosterone levels, and cognitive abilities. The theory gathers a wide range of neuropsychological phenomena and their associations under a single theoretical umbrella. |
|||
==References== |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
== |
==Relation to dyslexia== |
||
Dyslexic individuals have varying degrees of reading, writing, and verbal impairments.<ref name=":1">{{cite journal | vauthors = Ramus F, Altarelli I, Jednoróg K, Zhao J, Scotto di Covella L | title = Neuroanatomy of developmental dyslexia: Pitfalls and promise | journal = Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews | volume = 84 | pages = 434–452 | date = January 2018 | pmid = 28797557 | doi = 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.08.001 | s2cid = 33176236 }}</ref> The development of dyslexia has been explicitly highlighted in those who have a specific cerebral lateralisation pattern, which have shown difficulties in language processing. Typically, the left hemisphere of the brain is dominant in language processing; however, individuals with dyslexia may have an underdeveloped or functionally impaired left hemisphere, leading to language processing difficulties.<ref name=":1" /> In response to this, the right hemisphere and posterior parietal cortex compensate to undertake language processing tasks, resulting in inefficiencies in language processing.<ref name=":1" /> This compensatory activity in other areas of the brain may explain the variability in the degree of impairment experienced by dyslexic individuals.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal | vauthors = Green S |date=2020-05-03 |title=Dyslexia and neuroscience: the geschwind-galaburda hypothesis 30 years later |journal=Laterality |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=390–392 |doi=10.1080/1357650X.2019.1692858 |s2cid=212902340 |issn=1357-650X}}</ref> Understanding the relationship between cerebral lateralisation and language processing amongst dyslexic individuals could be an effective method of diagnosis and treatment.<ref name=":2" /> Further research could design appropriate schemes to enhance the language processing and communication abilities of the individuals. |
|||
* [[Handedness and sexual orientation]] |
|||
{{Laterality}} |
|||
==Studies== |
|||
The Geschwind–Galaburda hypothesis has garnered empirical support from a number of studies. For instance, Witelson et al. discovered that Einstein’s brain exhibited an atypical pattern of cerebral lateralisation, which supports the hypothesis that brain lateralisation is related to cognitive abilities.<ref name=":3">{{cite journal | vauthors = Witelson SF, Kigar DL, Harvey T | title = The exceptional brain of Albert Einstein | language = English | journal = Lancet | volume = 353 | issue = 9170 | pages = 2149–2153 | date = June 1999 | pmid = 10382713 | doi = 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10327-6 | s2cid = 31211773 }}</ref> In relation to the testosterone influence, an increased glial cell density in the left hemisphere caused an increased prenatal exposure to testosterone, which led to the disruption in the development of cerebral lateralisation.<ref name=":3" /> Therefore, the increased cell density in Einstein’s left hemisphere suggests the prenatal testosterone may have influenced his cognitive abilities and delayed language processing.<ref name=":3" /> |
|||
Another study highlighted how the role of neuroanatomy in an individual leads to developmental dyslexia. Researchers<ref name=":4">{{cite journal | vauthors = Illingworth S, Bishop DV | title = Atypical cerebral lateralisation in adults with compensated developmental dyslexia demonstrated using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound | journal = Brain and Language | volume = 111 | issue = 1 | pages = 61–65 | date = October 2009 | pmid = 19525003 | pmc = 2977530 | doi = 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.05.002 }}</ref> note that while the study of sex differences in dyslexia is still in its early stages, hormonal differences have been shown to cause cerebral asymmetry, which is followed by language and speech difficulties. The regions of the brain that are involved in language processing and phonological awareness, such as the planum temporal and inferior parietal lobule, have been found to differ between individuals with and without dyslexia.<ref name=":4" /> Impairments in these brain regions can lead to dyslexia, which is characterised by difficulties in reading and writing. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Although the Geschwind–Galaburda hypothesis has been cited in mainstream media and publication resources as a cause for left-handedness, very little research evidence (if any) has been presented to substantiate the theory. In fact, evidence has emerged suggesting that high prenatal estrogen exposure is just as likely to enhance the gene expression for left-handedness. In a study endorsed by the [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention|Centers for Disease Control]] (CDC), it is suggested that men who were prenatally exposed to [[diethylstilbestrol]] (a synthetic estrogen based fertility drug), are more likely to be left-handed than unexposed men.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Titus-Ernstoff L, Perez K, Hatch EE, Troisi R, Palmer JR, Hartge P, Hyer M, Kaufman R, Adam E, Strohsnitter W, Noller K, Pickett KE, Hoover R | display-authors = 6 | title = Psychosexual characteristics of men and women exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol | journal = Epidemiology | volume = 14 | issue = 2 | pages = 155–160 | date = March 2003 | pmid = 12606880 | doi = 10.1097/01.EDE.0000039059.38824.B2 | s2cid = 31181675 | doi-access = free }}</ref> A study by Cornish<ref name=":5">{{Cite journal | vauthors = Cornish KM | date = March 1996 |title=The Geschwind and Galaburda theory of cerebral lateralisation: An empirical evaluation of its assumptions |journal=Current Psychology |language=en |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=68–76 |doi=10.1007/BF02686935 | s2cid = 144483824 |issn=1936-4733}}</ref> found no association between sex and handedness, contradicting the expectation that there should be more males and left-handers. While the Geschwind–Galaburda hypothesis suggests that higher levels of testosterone should lead to cerebral lateralisation asymmetries, the theory has not been definitively proven or disproven.<ref name=":5" /> Further research is needed to fully understand the complexity of this theory and its implications. |
|||
Moreover, the theory has the potential to oversimplify the relationship between brain lateralisation and cognitive abilities. The impacts of brain lateralisation on cognitive abilities are highly complex, and there may be multiple causes that are not fully explained by cerebral lateralisation or circulating testosterone. A more holistic approach may be needed to fully understand the relationship between brain lateralisation and cognitive abilities. The controversial evidence supporting and not supporting the theory suggests that it may not be a reliable explanation for these developments. |
|||
==References and further reading== |
==References and further reading== |
||
{{reflist}} |
|||
*Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A.M. (1987). Cerebral Lateralization: biological mechanisms, associations and pathology. MIT press: Cambridge, MA. |
|||
*Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A.M. (1985a). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 428–459. |
|||
*Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A.M. (1985b). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: II. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 521–552. |
|||
*Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A.M. (1985c). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: III. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 634–654. |
|||
*Geschwind, N. (1979). Specialization of the Human Brain. Scientific American 241(3):180–199. |
|||
*Geschwind, N. (1972). Language and the Brain. Scientific American 226 (4):76–83. |
|||
{{ |
{{Laterality}} |
||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Geschwind-Galaburda hypothesis}} |
|||
[[Category:Biology of gender]] |
|||
[[Category:Sex differences in humans]] |
|||
[[Category:Motor skills]] |
[[Category:Motor skills]] |
||
[[ru:Теория Гешвинда — Галабурда]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:32, 22 May 2023
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
The Geschwind–Galaburda hypothesis is a neurological theory proposed by Norman Geschwind and Albert Galaburda in 1987.[1] The hypothesis posits there are sex differences in cognitive abilities by relating them to lateralisation of brain function.[1] The maturation rates of cerebral hemispheres differ and are mediated by circuiting testosterone levels, which are substantially influenced during the foetal and post-puberty development stages.[1]
According to the hypothesis, testosterone delays the maturation of the brain, particularly the left hemisphere, resulting in corresponding regions of the right hemisphere and unaffected areas of the left hemisphere developing more rapidly.[1] This leads to reduced verbal skills and an increased risk of developing language disorders, e.g dyslexia, while a rapid development of the right hemisphere and the skills corresponding to it, such as attention and problem-solving.[1]
Focusing on foetal testosterone, the rise in levels hinders the development of the individual’s neurology and immunity, potentially explaining how cerebral lateralisation links to learning disorders, giftedness, and immune deficits.[1] In cases of an underdeveloped or functionally impaired left hemisphere, the neuroanatomical asymmetries may lead to compensatory activity in other areas of the brain.[1]
The field of “neuropsychology of individual differences” is concerned with the understanding the relationship between brain lateralisation and behaviour variation. In their work, Geschwind and Galaburda proposed that in order to explain the differences in cognitive abilities, it is dependent on prenatal exposure to testosterone.[1] This comprehensive theoretical framework links the association between brain development, testosterone levels, and cognitive abilities. The theory gathers a wide range of neuropsychological phenomena and their associations under a single theoretical umbrella.
Relation to dyslexia
[edit]Dyslexic individuals have varying degrees of reading, writing, and verbal impairments.[2] The development of dyslexia has been explicitly highlighted in those who have a specific cerebral lateralisation pattern, which have shown difficulties in language processing. Typically, the left hemisphere of the brain is dominant in language processing; however, individuals with dyslexia may have an underdeveloped or functionally impaired left hemisphere, leading to language processing difficulties.[2] In response to this, the right hemisphere and posterior parietal cortex compensate to undertake language processing tasks, resulting in inefficiencies in language processing.[2] This compensatory activity in other areas of the brain may explain the variability in the degree of impairment experienced by dyslexic individuals.[3] Understanding the relationship between cerebral lateralisation and language processing amongst dyslexic individuals could be an effective method of diagnosis and treatment.[3] Further research could design appropriate schemes to enhance the language processing and communication abilities of the individuals.
Studies
[edit]The Geschwind–Galaburda hypothesis has garnered empirical support from a number of studies. For instance, Witelson et al. discovered that Einstein’s brain exhibited an atypical pattern of cerebral lateralisation, which supports the hypothesis that brain lateralisation is related to cognitive abilities.[4] In relation to the testosterone influence, an increased glial cell density in the left hemisphere caused an increased prenatal exposure to testosterone, which led to the disruption in the development of cerebral lateralisation.[4] Therefore, the increased cell density in Einstein’s left hemisphere suggests the prenatal testosterone may have influenced his cognitive abilities and delayed language processing.[4]
Another study highlighted how the role of neuroanatomy in an individual leads to developmental dyslexia. Researchers[5] note that while the study of sex differences in dyslexia is still in its early stages, hormonal differences have been shown to cause cerebral asymmetry, which is followed by language and speech difficulties. The regions of the brain that are involved in language processing and phonological awareness, such as the planum temporal and inferior parietal lobule, have been found to differ between individuals with and without dyslexia.[5] Impairments in these brain regions can lead to dyslexia, which is characterised by difficulties in reading and writing.
Contradictions
[edit]Although the Geschwind–Galaburda hypothesis has been cited in mainstream media and publication resources as a cause for left-handedness, very little research evidence (if any) has been presented to substantiate the theory. In fact, evidence has emerged suggesting that high prenatal estrogen exposure is just as likely to enhance the gene expression for left-handedness. In a study endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), it is suggested that men who were prenatally exposed to diethylstilbestrol (a synthetic estrogen based fertility drug), are more likely to be left-handed than unexposed men.[6] A study by Cornish[7] found no association between sex and handedness, contradicting the expectation that there should be more males and left-handers. While the Geschwind–Galaburda hypothesis suggests that higher levels of testosterone should lead to cerebral lateralisation asymmetries, the theory has not been definitively proven or disproven.[7] Further research is needed to fully understand the complexity of this theory and its implications.
Moreover, the theory has the potential to oversimplify the relationship between brain lateralisation and cognitive abilities. The impacts of brain lateralisation on cognitive abilities are highly complex, and there may be multiple causes that are not fully explained by cerebral lateralisation or circulating testosterone. A more holistic approach may be needed to fully understand the relationship between brain lateralisation and cognitive abilities. The controversial evidence supporting and not supporting the theory suggests that it may not be a reliable explanation for these developments.
References and further reading
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h McManus IC, Bryden MP (September 1991). "Geschwind's theory of cerebral lateralization: developing a formal, causal model". Psychological Bulletin. 110 (2): 237–253. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.237. PMID 1946868.
- ^ a b c Ramus F, Altarelli I, Jednoróg K, Zhao J, Scotto di Covella L (January 2018). "Neuroanatomy of developmental dyslexia: Pitfalls and promise". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 84: 434–452. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.08.001. PMID 28797557. S2CID 33176236.
- ^ a b Green S (2020-05-03). "Dyslexia and neuroscience: the geschwind-galaburda hypothesis 30 years later". Laterality. 25 (3): 390–392. doi:10.1080/1357650X.2019.1692858. ISSN 1357-650X. S2CID 212902340.
- ^ a b c Witelson SF, Kigar DL, Harvey T (June 1999). "The exceptional brain of Albert Einstein". Lancet. 353 (9170): 2149–2153. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10327-6. PMID 10382713. S2CID 31211773.
- ^ a b Illingworth S, Bishop DV (October 2009). "Atypical cerebral lateralisation in adults with compensated developmental dyslexia demonstrated using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound". Brain and Language. 111 (1): 61–65. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.05.002. PMC 2977530. PMID 19525003.
- ^ Titus-Ernstoff L, Perez K, Hatch EE, Troisi R, Palmer JR, Hartge P, et al. (March 2003). "Psychosexual characteristics of men and women exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol". Epidemiology. 14 (2): 155–160. doi:10.1097/01.EDE.0000039059.38824.B2. PMID 12606880. S2CID 31181675.
- ^ a b Cornish KM (March 1996). "The Geschwind and Galaburda theory of cerebral lateralisation: An empirical evaluation of its assumptions". Current Psychology. 15 (1): 68–76. doi:10.1007/BF02686935. ISSN 1936-4733. S2CID 144483824.