Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caius Titus (senator): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Caius Titus (senator): Closed as delete (XFDcloser)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Caius Titus (senator)]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 23:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
===[[:Caius Titus (senator)]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Caius Titus (senator)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caius Titus (senator)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 22#{{anchorencode:Caius Titus (senator)}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1156399547/cur|edits since nomination]])
:{{la|1=Caius Titus (senator)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caius Titus (senator)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 22#{{anchorencode:Caius Titus (senator)}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1156399547/cur|edits since nomination]])
Line 11: Line 16:
*'''Speedy delete''' The speedy tag should have been accepted. Also, the hoax seems to have spread to other language Wikipedias years ago, maybe we should contact them.[[User:StarTrekker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:StarTrekker|talk]]) 19:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''' The speedy tag should have been accepted. Also, the hoax seems to have spread to other language Wikipedias years ago, maybe we should contact them.[[User:StarTrekker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:StarTrekker|talk]]) 19:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
** To add, even if this isn't an intentional hoax, the person clearly isn't historical, "Caius Titus" is not a plausible name for a Roman senator of the middle Republic, it's made out of two praenomina one of which uses a very archaic spelling (''C''aius instead of ''G''aius).[[User:StarTrekker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:StarTrekker|talk]]) 20:51, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
** To add, even if this isn't an intentional hoax, the person clearly isn't historical, "Caius Titus" is not a plausible name for a Roman senator of the middle Republic, it's made out of two praenomina one of which uses a very archaic spelling (''C''aius instead of ''G''aius).[[User:StarTrekker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:StarTrekker|talk]]) 20:51, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
:::We might expect to find "Caius" in reference sources, however—it was a typical rendering up to recently, and still might be found in works of a non-specialist nature. Gaius ''Titius'' would be a plausible name, although I don't think we know of anyone of that name who would match this description; the fact that the proverb was previously attributed to the emperor Titus, then changed to this improbable name by an anonymous IP editor without explanation—a figure who just a few days ago became an important historical figure with his own article, not sourced to any known Roman writer or modern historian—is what marks it out as a hoax to me. [[User:P Aculeius|P Aculeius]] ([[User talk:P Aculeius|talk]]) 00:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. The article was created out of whole cloth by an editor whose only other contributions have also been hoaxes: 1) the citation to a source that apparently doesn't contain it (attributed to this person, who was added to that article by an anonymous IP editor, who changed it from Titus, the emperor, without explanation or source), and 2) phony embellishment of a quotation from a letter by [[James Clerk Maxwell]] to his uncle. This name is obviously wrong, and the lack of any detail apart from the bogus attribution of an aphorism that may or may not be Roman shows that it's made up. [[User:P Aculeius|P Aculeius]] ([[User talk:P Aculeius|talk]]) 19:19, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. The article was created out of whole cloth by an editor whose only other contributions have also been hoaxes: 1) the citation to a source that apparently doesn't contain it (attributed to this person, who was added to that article by an anonymous IP editor, who changed it from Titus, the emperor, without explanation or source), and 2) phony embellishment of a quotation from a letter by [[James Clerk Maxwell]] to his uncle. This name is obviously wrong, and the lack of any detail apart from the bogus attribution of an aphorism that may or may not be Roman shows that it's made up. [[User:P Aculeius|P Aculeius]] ([[User talk:P Aculeius|talk]]) 19:19, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Likely a [[WP:HOAX]], or at the very least an article that is factually incorrect. [[User:ULPS|ULPS]] ([[User talk:ULPS|talk]]) 21:46, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Likely a [[WP:HOAX]], or at the very least an article that is factually incorrect. [[User:ULPS|ULPS]] ([[User talk:ULPS|talk]]) 21:46, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as hoax. [[User:Iazyges|<span style="color:#838996">Iazyges</span>]] [[User talk:Iazyges|<span style="color:#838996">Consermonor</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Iazyges|<span style="color:#838996">Opus meum</span>]] 13:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as hoax. [[User:Ifly6|Ifly6]] ([[User talk:Ifly6|talk]]) 21:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 23:31, 29 May 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Caius Titus (senator) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some debate that this may be a hoax.[1] I cannot say it is certainly a hoax, as the name may be properly Gaius Titus, which may possibly refer to Titus Quinctius Flamininus based on a source I placed on the talk page. Yet, if it is about Flamininus then we have a much better article on him, and there is literally nothing here we can merge as it is all uncited. No good source links the Latin phrase to him either. Thus this should just be deleted. It is either a hoax or else it is an ill informed duplicate of an existing page. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We might expect to find "Caius" in reference sources, however—it was a typical rendering up to recently, and still might be found in works of a non-specialist nature. Gaius Titius would be a plausible name, although I don't think we know of anyone of that name who would match this description; the fact that the proverb was previously attributed to the emperor Titus, then changed to this improbable name by an anonymous IP editor without explanation—a figure who just a few days ago became an important historical figure with his own article, not sourced to any known Roman writer or modern historian—is what marks it out as a hoax to me. P Aculeius (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.