Jump to content

User talk:131.251.254.2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Posting on AN/I: add template to use
Posting on AN/I: DENY, removing TPA
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


Re your recent post on AN/I, it is important to place the notice on the user's talk page, or your complaint will just get wiped away. You can use {{tlx|subst:ANI-notice}} to do that. <small><sub>''signed'', </sub></small>[[User:Willondon|Willondon]] ([[User Talk:Willondon|talk]]) 16:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Re your recent post on AN/I, it is important to place the notice on the user's talk page, or your complaint will just get wiped away. You can use {{tlx|subst:ANI-notice}} to do that. <small><sub>''signed'', </sub></small>[[User:Willondon|Willondon]] ([[User Talk:Willondon|talk]]) 16:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
: Thanks. I had already placed the required notice, two minutes after I posted to the noticeboard. [[Special:Contributions/131.251.254.2|131.251.254.2]] ([[User talk:131.251.254.2#top|talk]]) 16:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''3 months''' for [[WP:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;[[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 16:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
{{unblock reviewed |1=This is completely insane. You've blocked my IP address for '''three months''', when I was the one getting randomly attacked for making a handful of minor edits which made articles more concise, clearer, more accurate and generally better? Replacing text like "It is notable for being the prototype example" with "It is the prototype example" is not controversial. It is a simple, ''obvious'' improvement. Why are you blocking me for such edits? [[Special:Contributions/131.251.254.2|131.251.254.2]] ([[User talk:131.251.254.2#top|talk]]) 16:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |decline = TPA removed per [[WP:DENY]]. [[WP:BMB|You are not welcome here, period.]] [[User:RickinBaltimore|RickinBaltimore]] ([[User talk:RickinBaltimore|talk]]) 15:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)}}

I find it ridiculous and outrageous that I was blocked. I made edits which made a few articles better. Nothing more, nothing less, just made some articles better. How the hell would you interpret my edits as anything other than valuable? It makes no sense. Whatever thought processes led you to insult me in this way were gravely mistaken. [[Special:Contributions/131.251.254.2|131.251.254.2]] ([[User talk:131.251.254.2#top|talk]]) 14:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:35, 30 June 2023

Posting on AN/I

[edit]

Re your recent post on AN/I, it is important to place the notice on the user's talk page, or your complaint will just get wiped away. You can use {{subst:ANI-notice}} to do that. signed, Willondon (talk) 16:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I had already placed the required notice, two minutes after I posted to the noticeboard. 131.251.254.2 (talk) 16:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 16:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

131.251.254.2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is completely insane. You've blocked my IP address for three months, when I was the one getting randomly attacked for making a handful of minor edits which made articles more concise, clearer, more accurate and generally better? Replacing text like "It is notable for being the prototype example" with "It is the prototype example" is not controversial. It is a simple, obvious improvement. Why are you blocking me for such edits? 131.251.254.2 (talk) 16:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I find it ridiculous and outrageous that I was blocked. I made edits which made a few articles better. Nothing more, nothing less, just made some articles better. How the hell would you interpret my edits as anything other than valuable? It makes no sense. Whatever thought processes led you to insult me in this way were gravely mistaken. 131.251.254.2 (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]