Jump to content

Talk:Gavin Massey/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
promote Gavin Massey to good article (GANReviewTool)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==GA Review==
==GA Review==
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. <span style="background-color: #87CEEB; color:white">[[User:1TWO3Writer|123Writer]]</span> <sup><span style="color:#FFB6C1">[[User talk:1TWO3Writer|talk]]</span></sup> 04:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Gavin Massey/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Gavin Massey/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Gavin Massey/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Gavin Massey/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
Line 114: Line 118:
<span style="background-color: #87CEEB; color:white">[[User:1TWO3Writer|123Writer]]</span> <sup><span style="color:#FFB6C1">[[User talk:1TWO3Writer|talk]]</span></sup> 17:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
<span style="background-color: #87CEEB; color:white">[[User:1TWO3Writer|123Writer]]</span> <sup><span style="color:#FFB6C1">[[User talk:1TWO3Writer|talk]]</span></sup> 17:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
:I've added some conclusion to the previous season.--[[User:EchetusXe|Echetus]][[User talk:EchetusXe|'''X'''e]] 23:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
:I've added some conclusion to the previous season.--[[User:EchetusXe|Echetus]][[User talk:EchetusXe|'''X'''e]] 23:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
::Great! All issues seem to be addressed. Another successful GA for you. :D <span style="background-color: #87CEEB; color:white">[[User:1TWO3Writer|123Writer]]</span> <sup><span style="color:#FFB6C1">[[User talk:1TWO3Writer|talk]]</span></sup> 04:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)


==== Career statistics ====
==== Career statistics ====
Sources seem reliable. Table is well-formatted, shows good statistical detail.
Sources seem reliable. Table is well-formatted, shows good statistical detail.
{{abot}}

Latest revision as of 04:17, 8 August 2023

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 1TWO3Writer (talk · contribs) 07:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Part of August 2023 backlog.

There is an issue with some of the references; some links are either dead or redirect. 5, for example, is dead, while 83 redirects. Check all the sources, especially those retrieved years ago, and replace them with archived pages (perhaps on the Wayback Machine). If not, then replace with another source that says the same thing or delete the statement. I checklink'd and there are numerous problems, see here. Unfortunately, the tool can't fix the issue, so you'll have to do it manually. Until that's fixed, I'll put the review on hold.

123Writer talk 13:08, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I have sorted those dead links out now. Thanks. EchetusXe 16:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'll continue the review shortly. Good work. 123Writer talk 16:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox, Lead, Images, References

[edit]

Infobox seems well-formatted, with info not in body cited in-line.

Lead provides a good overview of article, with good paragraphing that focuses on current and past affiliations. All info not cited in-line is cited in body, no issues.

Images are relevant to the subject, either own work or properly attributed to creator, and captioned properly.

Above issues on references have been fixed. I've archived all links so that doesn't become an issue in the future. (I couldn't use the bot prior as it'd just archive the redirect I think.) No issues.

Career

[edit]

Watford

[edit]

Spot-check: 4, 8, 10.

...on 85 minutes. -> 85 minutes into the game. Could also be at the 85 minute mark. Your discretion.

Done.--EchetusXe 23
42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

123Writer talk 17:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2010–11 season
[edit]

Spot-check: 6, 13, 19

Did some copy-editing. See history for changes and holler if you have any issues.

123Writer talk 17:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wealdstone loan
[edit]

Spot-check: 20, 25

25 makes no mention of his total games and goal count. Is it possible to find a source of some kind for this?

Done.--EchetusXe 23
42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

123Writer talk 17:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2011–12 season
[edit]

Spot-check: 26, 29

No issues.

Yeovil Town loan
[edit]

Spot-check: 32, 35, 41, 45

No issues.

Colchester United loans
[edit]

Spot-check: 46, 51, 53, 57

No issues.

Colchester United

[edit]

Spot-check: 58

No issues. Actually, looking at the rest of the article, I wonder if the season subtitling could be removed and this entire section condensed to the more notable appearances. Thoughts?

123Writer talk 17:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree, probably the same with the Watford section too.--EchetusXe 23:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
2012–13 season
[edit]

Spot-check: 60, 63, 65, 70

63 says Graham Massey.

123Writer talk 17:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lol, no such player, the BBC made a typo there.--EchetusXe 23:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
2013–14 season
[edit]

Spot-check: 72, 75, 78

Changed a football fan term into language more appropriate for a general audience.

123Writer talk 17:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2014–15 season
[edit]

Spot-check: 80, 85, 93

Again, some copy editing.

2015–16 season
[edit]

Spot-check: 94, 97

No issues.

Leyton Orient

[edit]

Spot-check: 101, 105, 107

Thought the term goal drought was a bit strange so changed it. Other than that, no issues.

123Writer talk 17:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wigan Athletic

[edit]

Spot-check: 108, 113, 115, 118, 121, 125

No issues.

Port Vale

[edit]

Spot-check: 126, 127, 130, 133

Removed adjective powerful as it's unnecessary.

Anything notable happen since January?

123Writer talk 17:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some conclusion to the previous season.--EchetusXe 23:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great! All issues seem to be addressed. Another successful GA for you. :D 123Writer talk 04:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Career statistics

[edit]

Sources seem reliable. Table is well-formatted, shows good statistical detail.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.