Jump to content

Within the Law (play): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
External links: Commons category added
External links: + category
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Play by Bayard Veiller}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2017}}
{{Infobox play
{{Infobox play
| name = Within the Law
| name = Within the Law
| image = Within the Law Broadway play scene.JPG
| image = Within the Law Broadway play scene.JPG
| image_size =
| image_alt = Black and white photo of five men and a woman on a stage built to look like the interior of an elegant home.
| image_alt = Black and white photo of five men and a woman on a stage built to look like the interior of an elegant home.
| caption = Advertising postcard for ''Within the Law''
| caption = Advertising postcard for ''Within the Law''
Line 8: Line 9:
| characters =
| characters =
| setting =
| setting =
| premiere = {{Start date|1912|09|11}}<ref group=note>Premier information is for the Broadway production.</ref>
| premiere = {{Start date|1912|09|11}}{{efn|Premier information is for the Broadway production.}}
| place = [[Eltinge 42nd Street Theatre]]
| place = [[Eltinge 42nd Street Theatre]]
| orig_lang = [[English language|English]]
| orig_lang = [[English language|English]]
Line 16: Line 17:
}}
}}


'''''Within the Law''''' is a [[Play (theatre)|play]] written by [[Bayard Veiller]]. It is the story of a woman who is wrongly accused of stealing and sent to prison. Upon her release, she sets up a gang that engages in shady activities that are just "within the law". After the police try to entrap her, she is mistakenly accused again, this time for murder, but she is vindicated when the real killer confesses.
'''''Within the Law''''' is a [[Play (theatre)|play]] written by [[Bayard Veiller]]. It is the story of Mary Turner, a sales clerk who is wrongly accused of stealing and sent to prison. Upon her release, Turner sets up a gang that engages in shady activities that are just "within the law". After the police try to entrap her, she is mistakenly accused again, this time for murder, but she is vindicated when the real killer confesses.


Veiller used his experience as a crime reporter to develop the play, but he was initially unable to find a producer for it. He finally settled on selling the rights to the play, along with two others he had written, for a fixed fee. After an unsuccessful run in Chicago, it became a huge hit on [[Broadway theatre|Broadway]] in 1912–1913, running for 541 performances. It was subsequently performed by multiple road companies and adapted as a movie five times. Although it was one of the biggest hits of its era, Veiller got relatively little income from it due to his decision to sell it for a lump sum.
Veiller used his experience as a crime reporter to develop the play, but he was initially unable to find a producer for it. He finally settled on selling the rights to the play, along with two others he had written, for a fixed fee. After an unsuccessful run in Chicago, it became a huge hit on [[Broadway theatre|Broadway]] in 1912–1913, running for 541 performances. It was subsequently performed by multiple road companies and adapted as a movie five times. Although it was one of the biggest hits of its era, Veiller got relatively little income from it due to his decision to sell it for a lump sum.


==Plot==
==Plot==
[[File:Bayard Veiller 1920.jpg|thumb|upright|alt=Black and white photo of a white man with a mustache, wearing a suit.|[[Bayard Veiller]] wrote the play in 1911.]]
In the first act, word comes to the department store owner Edward Gilder that one of his former sales clerks, Mary Turner, has been convicted for stealing and given a three-year prison sentence. Gilder is pleased because he had asked the judge to make her an "example" to other employees. Turner asks to speak with Gilder before she goes to prison. While Gilder waits for her arrival, his store detective detains another woman, a customer, for stealing. This woman is the wife of a prominent banker, so rather than have her arrested, Gilder apologizes to her and lets her go. Turner arrives and tells Gilder she has been wrongly convicted. Although she says she never stole, she pleads with Gilder to increase the wages of his clerks, so no one who works there will be forced to steal. Gilder rejects her arguments, and she leaves for prison swearing revenge on him for his treatment of her.
In the first act, department store owner Edward Gilder learns that one of his former sales clerks, Mary Turner, has been convicted for stealing and given a three-year prison sentence. Gilder is pleased because he had asked the judge to make her an "example" to other employees. Turner asks to speak with Gilder before she goes to prison. While Gilder waits for her arrival, his store detective detains another woman, a customer, for stealing. This woman is the wife of a prominent banker, so rather than have her arrested, Gilder apologizes to her and lets her go. Turner arrives and tells Gilder she has been wrongly convicted. Although she says she never stole, she pleads with Gilder to increase the wages of his clerks, so no one who works there will be forced to steal. Gilder rejects her arguments, and she leaves for prison swearing revenge on him for his treatment of her.


Upon getting out of prison, Turner sets up a gang that engages in shady activities that are just within the boundaries of the law. She also marries Gilder's son. A member of the gang attempts to rob the home of Turner's new father-in-law at the urging of a police stooge attempting to [[entrap]] the gang. When the stooge reveals the plot, the gang member kills him, leaving Turner and her new husband at the scene to be found by the police. It seems that Turner may go to prison again, but she is saved when the guilty party confesses that she had no involvement in the crimes.<ref name="nytreview">{{cite news |title=''Within the Law'' a Vivid Melodrama |work=The New York Times |url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40712F9395813738DDDAB0994D1405B828DF1D3 |date=September 12, 1912}}</ref><ref group=note>Plot details are based on the Broadway production. Revisions to the script were made for the Chicago production, which were removed for later productions.</ref>
After being released from prison, Turner sets up a gang that engages in shady activities that are just within the boundaries of the law. She also marries Gilder's son. A member of the gang attempts to rob the home of Turner's new father-in-law at the urging of a police stooge attempting to [[entrap]] the gang. When the stooge reveals the plot, the gang member kills him, leaving Turner and her new husband at the scene to be found by the police. It seems that Turner may go to prison again, but she is saved when the guilty party confesses that she had no involvement in the crimes.<ref name="nytreview">{{cite news |title=''Within the Law'' a Vivid Melodrama |work=The New York Times |url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40712F9395813738DDDAB0994D1405B828DF1D3 |date=September 12, 1912}}</ref>{{efn|Plot details are based on the Broadway production. Revisions to the script were made for the Chicago production, which were removed for later productions.}}


==History==
==History==
[[File:Bayard Veiller 1920.jpg|thumb|right|upright|alt=Black and white photo of a white man with a mustache, wearing a suit.|[[Bayard Veiller]] wrote the play in 1911.]]
[[File:Brady 3775426888 2c8e3d0316.jpg|thumb|right|upright|alt=Black and white photo of a white man in a three-piece suit with glasses and a hat.|[[William A. Brady]] mounted the first production in Chicago.]]
Veiller began writing the play under the title ''The Miracle'', which he later revised to ''The Case of Mary Turner'' and finally to ''Within the Law''. In 1911 he took it to the Selwyn brothers (Archie and [[Edgar Selwyn]]), who brokered plays, to find a producer for it. Several prominent producers considered it, including [[David Belasco]], [[George M. Cohan]], [[Charles Frohman]], [[Sam H. Harris (producer)|Sam Harris]], and [[Henry Wilson Savage]]. It was repeatedly rejected. The production duo of Louis Dreyfus and Herman Fellner took an option on the play, but they ran into financial difficulties and the option lapsed.<ref name="luck">{{cite news |title=The Luck of Bayard Veiller |work=The New York Times |date=December 10, 1916 |url=http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F40E13F63E5F17738DDDA90994DA415B868DF1D3}}</ref><ref name="Wolf147">{{harvnb|Wolf|1915|p=147}}</ref><ref name="Mantle277">{{harvnb|Mantle|1938|p=277}}</ref>
Veiller began writing the play under the title ''The Miracle'', which he later revised to ''The Case of Mary Turner'' and finally to ''Within the Law''. In 1911 he took it to the Selwyn brothers (Archie and [[Edgar Selwyn]]), who brokered plays, to find a producer for it. Several prominent producers considered it, including [[David Belasco]], [[George M. Cohan]], [[Charles Frohman]], [[Sam H. Harris (producer)|Sam Harris]], and [[Henry Wilson Savage]]. It was repeatedly rejected. The production duo of Louis Dreyfus and Herman Fellner took an option on the play, but they ran into financial difficulties and the option lapsed.<ref name="luck">{{cite news |title=The Luck of Bayard Veiller |work=The New York Times |date=December 10, 1916 |url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1916/12/10/104238517.pdf}}</ref><ref name="Wolf147">{{harvnb|Wolf|1915|p=147}}</ref><ref name="Mantle277">{{harvnb|Mantle|1938|p=277}}</ref> Seeing few prospects for his work, Veiller offered to sell the rights to ''Within the Law'' and two other plays to the Selwyns for a flat fee of $3,750 (about ${{inflation|US-GDP|3750|1911|r=-3|fmt=c}} in {{inflation-year|US-GDP}} dollars).{{inflation-fn|US-GDP|group=lower-alpha}} They were reluctant to accept this offer, fearing that they would be seen as exploiting an author in financial difficulty, but they eventually agreed.<ref name="luck"/>


Soon after the Selwyns purchased it, the play attracted the interest of producer [[William A. Brady]]. Brady thought the lead role would good for his wife, actress [[Grace George]]. She decided not to take the part, but Brady continued with the production anyway. Brady asked writer and theater manager [[George Broadhurst]] to make some script revisions. Brady's production opened at the Princess Theatre in Chicago on April 6, 1912.<ref name="Reynolds450-451"/> After a few weeks of unsuccessful results, Brady was disillusioned with the play and offered to sell the rights back to the Selwyns. Brady closed the Chicago production on June 22, 1912. The Selwyn brothers bought it back under the auspices of one of their businesses, the American Play Company. They were joined by several partners: [[Lee Shubert]] (who already had a share of the play as Brady's partner on the Chicago production), [[A. H. Woods]], and Crosby Gaige. They paid Brady $10,000, which was enough to cover his costs for the Chicago production, but a tiny fraction of what the play would later earn.<ref name="luck"/><ref name="Wolf147"/><ref name="Mantle277"/><ref name="Reynolds450-451">{{harvnb|Reynolds|1914|pp=450–451}}</ref>
[[File:Brady 3775426888 2c8e3d0316.jpg|thumb|left|upright|alt=Black and white photo of a white man in a three-piece suit with glasses and a hat.|[[William A. Brady]] mounted the first production in Chicago.]]
Seeing few prospects for his work, Veiller offered to sell the rights to ''Within the Law'' and two other plays to the Selwyns for a flat fee of $3,750 (about ${{inflation|US-NGDPPC|3750|1911|r=-3|fmt=c}} in {{inflation-year|US-NGDPPC}} dollars).{{inflation-fn|US-NGDPPC}} They eventually agreed. Soon after the play attracted the interest of producer [[William A. Brady]]. Brady asked [[George Broadhurst]] to make some script revisions, then staged a production in Chicago that opened in the spring of 1912. After a few weeks of unsuccessful results, Brady was disillusioned with the play and offered to sell the rights back to the Selwyns. The brothers bought it under the auspices of one of their businesses, the American Play Company. They were joined by several partners: [[Lee Shubert]] (who already had a share of the play as Brady's partner on the Chicago production), [[Albert H. Woods]], and Crosby Gaige. Brady got $10,000 (about ${{inflation|US-NGDPPC|10000|1912|r=-3|fmt=c}} in {{inflation-year|US-NGDPPC}} dollars),{{inflation-fn|US-NGDPPC}} enough to cover his costs for the Chicago production, but a tiny fraction of what the play would later earn.<ref name="luck"/><ref name="Wolf147"/><ref name="Mantle277"/><ref name="Reynolds450-451">{{harvnb|Reynolds|1914|pp=450–451}}</ref>


[[File:Eltinge 42nd Street Theatre.jpg|thumb|right|alt=Black and white photo of a theater with a vaulted ceiling and an ornate curtain in front of the stage.|''Within the Law'' was the debut play for the newly built [[Eltinge Theatre]].]]
Woods brought the play to his newly built [[Eltinge 42nd Street Theatre]] in New York, where it was the venue's debut production. The show opened at the Eltinge in September 1912 and did not leave for over a year, becoming the biggest hit of the 1912-1913 Broadway season. After flubbing an important line on opening night, an actress bemoaned to Veiller that she had "ruined" his play. Reflecting on the production's critical and financial success in his autobiography, Veiller wished that more actresses had "ruined" his plays in this way.<ref name="Veiller202-203">{{harvnb|Veiller|2010|pp=202–203}}</ref> Veiller earned no royalties, having sold his rights for a fixed fee. However, the Selwyns did not want to develop a reputation for taking advantage of authors, so they offered him a stipend of $100 per week for the Broadway run, and $50 per week for each road company (about ${{inflation|US-NGDPPC|100|1913|r=-2|fmt=c}} and ${{inflation|US-NGDPPC|50|1913|r=-2|fmt=c}} in {{inflation-year|US-NGDPPC}} dollars).<ref name="luck"/>{{inflation-fn|US-NGDPPC}} It was Veiller's first hit as a playwright.<ref name="Mantle277"/><ref>{{harvnb|Kabatchnik|2009|pp=124–125}}</ref>
Woods brought the play to his newly built [[Eltinge 42nd Street Theatre]] in New York, where it was the venue's debut production. The show opened on September 11, 1912. [[Holbrook Blinn]] directed the production and used Veiller's original script without the changes made by Broadhurst. It was the biggest hit of the 1912–1913 Broadway season. It ran for 541 performances and did not close until December 1913.<ref name="Reynolds450-451"/><ref>{{harvnb|Henderson|Greene|2008|pp=147–148}}</ref> After flubbing an important line on opening night, an actress bemoaned to Veiller that she had "ruined" his play. Reflecting on the production's critical and financial success in his autobiography, Veiller wished that more actresses had "ruined" his plays in this way.<ref name="Veiller202-203">{{harvnb|Veiller|2010|pp=202–203}}</ref> After the production closed at the Eltinge, multiple road companies were launched. Nine different companies toured North America, while another opened in the United Kingdom.<ref name="luck"/>


Because he sold his rights for a fixed fee, Veiller earned no royalties. Since the Selwyns did not want to develop a reputation for taking advantage of authors, they offered him a stipend of $100 per week for the Broadway run and $50 per week for each road company.<ref name="luck"/> ''Within the Law'' was Veiller's first hit as a playwright.<ref name="Mantle277"/><ref>{{harvnb|Kabatchnik|2009|pp=124–125}}</ref>
==Productions==
[[File:Eltinge 42nd Street Theatre interior.jpg|thumb|right|alt=Black and white photo of the inside of a theater, with a high vaulted ceiling and an ornate curtain in front of the stage.|''Within the Law'' was the debut play for the newly built [[Eltinge Theatre]].]]
The play debuted at the Princess Theatre in Chicago on April 6, 1912. William A. Brady produced, and he had George Broadhurst make revisions to the script.<ref name="Reynolds450-451"/> It closed on June 22, 1912.


A Broadway revival was staged in 1928, with Clifford Brook and [[Mabel Brownell]] directing. It opened at the [[Cosmopolitan Theatre (New York City)|Cosmopolitan Theatre]] on March 5, 1928, and closed after 16 performances.<ref>{{harvnb|Fisher|Londre|2008|p=522}}</ref>
The first and most successful Broadway production opened at the [[Eltinge 42nd Street Theatre]] on September 11, 1912. [[Holbrook Blinn]] directed the production and used Veiller's original script, without the changes made by Broadhurst. It was the first show ever staged at the Eltinge. It ran for 541 performances and did not close until December 1913.<ref name="Reynolds450-451"/><ref>{{harvnb|Henderson|Greene|2008|pp=147–148}}</ref>

After the production closed at the Eltinge, multiple road companies were launched. Nine different companies toured North America, while another opened in the United Kingdom.<ref name="luck"/>

A Broadway revival was staged in 1928, with Clifford Brook and [[Mabel Brownell]] directing. It opened at the [[Cosmopolitan Theatre (New York City)|Cosmopolitan Theatre]] on March 5, 1928, but closed after just 16 performances.<ref>{{harvnb|Fisher|Londre|2008|p=522}}</ref>


==Cast and characters==
==Cast and characters==
[[File:Jane Cowl.jpg|thumb|right|upright|alt=Black and white full-length portrait of Jane Cowl.|[[Jane Cowl]] circa 1913.]]
The play's protagonist and lead female role is Mary Turner, a shopgirl who becomes a criminal mastermind. [[Grace George]] initially accepted the part for the Chicago production, but changed her mind during rehearsals and decided she did not want to play the leader of a criminal gang. [[Emily Stevens (actress)|Emily Stevens]] took on the role instead.<ref name="luck"/>
The play's protagonist and lead female role is Mary Turner, a shopgirl who becomes a criminal mastermind. [[Grace George]] initially accepted the part for the Chicago production, but changed her mind during rehearsals and decided she did not want to play the leader of a criminal gang. [[Emily Stevens (actress)|Emily Stevens]] took on the role instead.<ref name="luck"/>


Line 52: Line 47:
Actor [[William B. Mack]] appeared in both the Chicago and Broadway productions, both times playing Joe Garson, the gang member responsible for the shooting.
Actor [[William B. Mack]] appeared in both the Chicago and Broadway productions, both times playing Joe Garson, the gang member responsible for the shooting.


The characters and cast from the Broadway production are given below:
The characters and cast from the Broadway production are given below:
[[File:Within the law act 3 scene.jpg|thumb|right|upright|alt=A man kneeling on a couch holds the arm of a woman who is leaning against the couch, facing away from him.|Orme Caldara with Jane Cowl in a scene from the Broadway production.]]
[[File:Stage actress Jane Cowl (SAYRE 22268).jpg|thumb|right|upright|alt=Black and white full-length portrait of Jane Cowl.|[[Jane Cowl]], ''Within the Law'']]
[[File:Within the law act 3 scene.jpg|thumb|right|upright|alt=A man kneeling on a couch holds the arm of a woman who is leaning against the couch, facing away from him.|Orme Caldara with Jane Cowl in a scene from the Broadway production]]
<!-- This table should note ONLY bluelinked actors from productions described in the Productions section, except for principals in the Broadway cast. -->
<!-- This table should note ONLY bluelinked actors from productions described in the Productions section, except for principals in the Broadway cast. -->
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
!| Character
!| Character
!| Broadway first run cast<ref>Unless otherwise cited, all cast info is from {{cite web |url=http://ibdb.com/production.php?id=7012 |title=Within the Law |publisher=[[Internet Broadway Database]] |accessdate=March 28, 2014}}</ref>
!| Broadway first run cast<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ibdb.com/production.php?id=7012 |title=Within the Law |publisher=[[Internet Broadway Database]] |access-date=March 28, 2014}}</ref>
!| Other notable performers<ref>Cast info for 1928 revivial is from {{cite web |url=http://ibdb.com/production.php?id=10598 |title=Within the Law |publisher=[[Internet Broadway Database]] |accessdate=March 28, 2014}}</ref>
!| 1928 Broadway revival<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ibdb.com/production.php?id=10598 |title=Within the Law |publisher=[[Internet Broadway Database]] |access-date=March 28, 2014}}</ref>
|-
|-
|Tom Tupper||Edward Bolton||
|Tom Tupper||Edward Bolton||
|-
|-
|Richard Gilder||Orme Caldara||[[Charles Ray (actor)|Charles Ray]] (1928 revival)
|Richard Gilder||Orme Caldara||[[Charles Ray (actor)|Charles Ray]]
|-
|-
|Dacey||John Camp||
|Dacey||John Camp||
|-
|-
|Mary Turner||[[Jane Cowl]];<br/>[[Helen Ware]]<ref name="Kilgarif206"/>||[[Emily Stevens (actress)|Emily Stevens]] (1912 Chicago production);<ref name="luck"/><br/>[[Violet Heming]] (1928 revival)
|Mary Turner||[[Jane Cowl]];<br />[[Helen Ware]]<ref name="Kilgarif206"/>||[[Violet Heming]]
|-
|-
|Thomas||Arthur Ebbetts||
|Thomas||Arthur Ebbetts||
|-
|-
|Eddie Griggs||Kenneth Hill||[[Stanley Logan]] (1928 revival)
|Eddie Griggs||Kenneth Hill||[[Stanley Logan]]
|-
|-
|Dan||Frederick Howe||
|Dan||Frederick Howe||
Line 78: Line 74:
|Sarah||Georgia Lawrence||
|Sarah||Georgia Lawrence||
|-
|-
|Joe Garson||[[William B. Mack]]||[[Robert Warwick]] (1928 revival)
|Joe Garson||[[William B. Mack]]||[[Robert Warwick]]
|-
|-
|Edward Gilder||Dodson Mitchell||
|Edward Gilder||Dodson Mitchell||
|-
|-
|Agnes Lynch||[[Florence Nash]]||[[Claudette Colbert]] (1928 revival)
|Agnes Lynch||[[Florence Nash]]||[[Claudette Colbert]]
|-
|-
|Williams||Joseph Nickson||
|Williams||Joseph Nickson||
Line 92: Line 88:
|Smithson||S. V. Phillips||
|Smithson||S. V. Phillips||
|-
|-
|Inspector Burke||[[Wilton Taylor]]||[[Frank Shannon]] (1928 revival)
|Inspector Burke||[[Wilton Taylor]]||[[Frank Shannon]]
|-
|-
|Helen Morris||Catherine Tower||[[Peggy Allenby]] (1928 revival)
|Helen Morris||Catherine Tower||[[Peggy Allenby]]
|-
|-
|Fannie||Martha White||
|Fannie||Martha White||
Line 106: Line 102:


===Reviews===
===Reviews===
The Broadway production received positive reviews. The reviewer for ''[[The New York Times]]'' called it "an exciting entertainment of the most vivid kind", praising the writing and the performances.<ref name="nytreview"/> A review in ''Brooklyn Life'' called the story "extremely interesting and well told" and said there was "not a weak spot in the cast".<ref>{{cite news |title=Plays and Players |work=Brooklyn Life |volume=46 |issue=1177 |date=September 21, 1912 |pages=7, 32 |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/1526882/brooklyn_life/ |via=[[Newspapers.com]]}}{{open access}}</ref>
The Broadway production received positive reviews. The reviewer for ''[[The New York Times]]'' called it "an exciting entertainment of the most vivid kind", praising the writing and the performances.<ref name="nytreview"/> A review in ''Brooklyn Life'' called the story "extremely interesting and well told" and said there was "not a weak spot in the cast".<ref>{{cite news |title=Plays and Players |work=Brooklyn Life |volume=46 |issue=1177 |date=September 21, 1912 |pages=7, 32 |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/1526882/brooklyn_life/ |via=[[Newspapers.com]]}}</ref> In ''[[Everybody's Magazine]]'', drama critic [[Clayton Hamilton (critic)|Clayton Hamilton]] called it "a genuine achievement" that was "tightly constructed, tersely written, and admirably acted".<ref>{{cite magazine |first=Clayton |last=Hamilton |author-link=Clayton Hamilton (critic) |title=The Players: ''Within the Law'' |magazine=[[Everybody's Magazine]] |date=November 1912 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=EuItAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA675 675]}}</ref>


===Box office===
===Box office===
Although it received positive reviews, the Chicago production was not a commercial success.
Although it received positive reviews, the Chicago production was not a commercial success.


The ''New York Times'' review of the Broadway production predicted that the play was "sure of being extremely successful".<ref name="nytreview"/> This prediction was accurate, as the show became a huge hit. The opening night had multiple [[curtain calls]], and by the second night the theater was so packed that Veiller could not enter to watch the performance.<ref name="Veiller202-203"/> In 1914, Walter Reynolds called it "the greatest success of any modern melodrama produced in the metropolis",<ref name="Reynolds450-451"/> and in 1915, theater journalist Rennold Wolf said it was possibly "the most profitable play of our generation".<ref name="Wolf147"/> By 1917, productions in the United States had taken in revenues of about ${{format price|2437572.72}} (${{format price|{{inflation|US-NGDPPC|2437572.72|1917}}}} in {{inflation-year|US-NGDPPC}} dollars).{{inflation-fn|US-NGDPPC}}<ref>{{cite news |title=The Silent Drama |work=[[The Sunday Oregonian]] |date=June 3, 1917 |volume=36 |issue=22 |page=4.5 |url=http://oregonnews.uoregon.edu/lccn/sn83045782/1917-06-03/ed-1/seq-57.pdf}}</ref>
The ''New York Times'' review of the Broadway production predicted that the play was "sure of being extremely successful".<ref name="nytreview"/> This prediction was accurate, as the show became a huge hit. The opening night had multiple [[curtain calls]], and by the second night the theater was so packed that Veiller could not enter to watch the performance.<ref name="Veiller202-203"/> In 1914, Walter Reynolds called it "the greatest success of any modern melodrama produced in the metropolis",<ref name="Reynolds450-451"/> and in 1915, theater journalist Rennold Wolf said it was possibly "the most profitable play of our generation".<ref name="Wolf147"/> By 1917, productions in the United States had taken in revenues of about ${{format price|2437572.72}} (${{format price|{{inflation|US-GDP|2437572.72|1917}}}} in {{inflation-year|US-GDP}} dollars).{{inflation-fn|US-GDP|group=lower-alpha}}<ref>{{cite news |title=The Silent Drama |work=[[The Sunday Oregonian]] |date=June 3, 1917 |volume=36 |issue=22 |page=4.5 |url=http://oregonnews.uoregon.edu/lccn/sn83045782/1917-06-03/ed-1/seq-57.pdf}}</ref>


==Adaptations==
==Adaptations==
[[File:Within the Law 1917 movie ad.jpg|thumb|right|alt=Advertisement for Within the Law.|An advertising circular for the 1917 movie adaptation starring [[Alice Joyce]].]]
[[File:Within the Law 1917 movie ad.jpg|thumb|right|alt=Advertisement for Within the Law|An advertising circular for the 1917 movie adaptation starring [[Alice Joyce]]]]


===Movies===
===Movies===
The play was adapted as a movie five different times from 1916 to 1939. In 1916, the Australian production company [[J.C. Williamson Ltd]] became the first to adapt the play, which they had previously produced for the stage in several Australian cities.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ausstage.edu.au/pages/organisation/9567 |title=J. C. Williamson Limited |publisher=[[AusStage]] |accessdate=April 11, 2016}}</ref> For the stage productions, they imported several actors who had performed the play in the United States, including Canadian actress [[Muriel Starr]] as Turner.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article5797412 |title=Amusements |work=[[The Advertiser (Adelaide)|The Advertiser]] |location=Adelaide |date=August 16, 1913 |page=22 |volume=56 |issue=17,109}}</ref> For the silent film they kept her in the role, and also kept ''[[Within the Law (1916 film)|Within the Law]]'' as the title. The movie was filmed mostly on the stage of the Theatre Royal in [[Melbourne]], with [[Monte Luke]] directing.<ref>{{cite book |first1=Andrew |last1=Pike |first2=Ross |last2=Cooper |title=Australian Film 1900–1977: A Guide to Feature Film Production |location=Melbourne |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1998 |edition=2nd |isbn=0-19-550784-3 |page=58}}</ref>
The play was adapted as a movie five different times from 1916 to 1939. In 1916, the Australian production company [[J.&nbsp;C. Williamson Ltd]] became the first to adapt the play, which they had previously produced for the stage in several Australian cities.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ausstage.edu.au/pages/organisation/9567 |title=J. C. Williamson Limited |publisher=[[AusStage]] |access-date=April 11, 2016}}</ref> The stage productions included several actors who had performed the play in the United States, such as Canadian actress [[Muriel Starr]] as Turner.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article5797412 |title=Amusements |work=[[The Advertiser (Adelaide)|The Advertiser]] |location=Adelaide |date=August 16, 1913 |page=22 |volume=56 |issue=17,109}}</ref> Starr kept role for the film, which also kept ''[[Within the Law (1916 film)|Within the Law]]'' as its title. Director [[Monte Luke]] filmed mostly on the stage of the Theatre Royal in [[Melbourne]].<ref>{{harvnb|Pike|Cooper|1998|p=58}}</ref>


The first American adaptation came the following year, also under the title ''[[Within the Law (1917 film)|Within the Law]]''. The [[Vitagraph Company of America]] produced the silent film, with [[William P. S. Earle]] directing. [[Alice Joyce]] played Turner. The last of the silent film adaptations, again titled ''[[Within the Law (1923 film)|Within the Law]]'', came in 1923. Popular star [[Norma Talmadge]] produced and played Turner, with [[Frank Lloyd]] directing.
[[File:Within the Law (1923 film).jpg|alt=Lobby card for Within the Law|thumb|right|Lobby card for the 1923 adaptation starring [[Norma Talmadge]]]]
The first American adaptation came the following year, also under the title ''[[Within the Law (1917 film)|Within the Law]]''. [[William P. S. Earle]] directed the silent film for the [[Vitagraph Company of America]]. [[Alice Joyce]] played Turner. The last of the silent film adaptations, again titled ''[[Within the Law (1923 film)|Within the Law]]'', came in 1923. Popular star [[Norma Talmadge]] produced and played Turner; [[Frank Lloyd]] directed.


In 1930, the first sound film adaptation changed the title to ''[[Paid (1930 film)|Paid]]''. [[Sam Wood]] directed the [[Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer]] (MGM) production. MGM star [[Joan Crawford]] played Turner. MGM also produced the final adaptation of the play in 1939. ''[[Within the Law (1939 film)|Within the Law]]'' was restored as the title. Czech filmmaker [[Gustav Machatý]] directed, with [[Ruth Hussey]] starring as Turner.
In 1930, the first sound film adaptation used the title ''[[Paid (1930 film)|Paid]]''. [[Sam Wood]] directed the [[Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer]] (MGM) production. MGM star [[Joan Crawford]] played Turner. MGM also produced the final adaptation of the play in 1939. ''[[Within the Law (1939 film)|Within the Law]]'' was restored as the title. Czech filmmaker [[Gustav Machatý]] directed, with [[Ruth Hussey]] starring as Turner.


===Other adaptations===
===Other adaptations===
In 1913, H.K. Fly published a novelization of the play, written by Marvin Dana.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.worldcat.org/title/within-the-law-from-the-play-of-bayard-veiller-a-novel-with-plates/oclc/774519895 |title=Within the Law ... From the play of Bayard Veiller |publisher=[[WorldCat]] |accessdate=March 28, 2014}}</ref>
In 1913, H.K. Fly published a novelization of the play, written by [[Marvin Dana]].<ref>{{cite web <!--Citing OCLC itself --> |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/774519895 |title=Within the Law ... From the play of Bayard Veiller |publisher=[[WorldCat]] |access-date=March 28, 2014}}</ref>


The play was adapted for television as an episode of ''[[Broadway Television Theatre]]'' that aired on June 2, 1952.<ref>{{harvnb|Terrace|2013|p=69}}</ref>
The play was adapted for television as an episode of ''[[Broadway Television Theatre]]'' that aired on June 2, 1952.<ref>{{harvnb|Terrace|2013|p=69}}</ref>


==Notes==
==Notes==
{{Noteslist}}
{{Reflist|group=note}}


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|30em}}
{{Reflist}}


===Works cited===
===Works cited===
* {{Cite journal |ref=harv |first=Jane |last=Cowl |title=The Sob Part |work=The Green Book Magazine |date=March 1914 |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=441–446}}
* {{Cite magazine |first=Jane |last=Cowl |title=The Sob Part |magazine=The Green Book Magazine |date=March 1914 |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=441–446}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |title= The A to Z of American Theater: Modernism |first1=James |last1=Fisher |first2=Felicia Hardison |last2=Londre |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |location=Lanham, Maryland |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-8108-6884-7 |lastauthoramp=yes}}
* {{Cite book |title= The A to Z of American Theater: Modernism |first1=James |last1=Fisher |first2=Felicia Hardison |last2=Londre |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |location=Lanham, Maryland |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-8108-6884-7 |name-list-style=amp}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |first1=Mary C. |last1=Henderson |first2=Alexis |last2=Greene |title=The Story of 42nd Street: The Theaters, Shows, Characters, and Scandals of the World's Most Notorious Street |publisher=Back Stage Books |year=2008 |isbn=9780823030729 |lastauthoramp=yes}}
* {{Cite book |first1=Mary C. |last1=Henderson |first2=Alexis |last2=Greene |title=The Story of 42nd Street: The Theaters, Shows, Characters, and Scandals of the World's Most Notorious Street |publisher=Back Stage Books |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-8230-3072-9 |name-list-style=amp |url=https://archive.org/details/storyof42ndstree00hend }}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |title=Blood on the Stage, 1925-1950: Milestone Plays of Crime, Mystery, and Detection |last=Kabatchnik |first=Amnon |location=Lanham, Maryland |publisher=Scarecrow Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-8108-6963-9 |oclc=320351782}}
* {{Cite book |title=Blood on the Stage, 1925–1950: Milestone Plays of Crime, Mystery, and Detection |last=Kabatchnik |first=Amnon |location=Lanham, Maryland |publisher=Scarecrow Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-8108-6963-9}}
* {{Cite journal |ref=harv |author=Kilgarif |title=The Stage: Miss Cowl's Ambition |work=Neale's Monthly |date=August 1913 |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=205–206}}
* {{Cite magazine |author=Kilgarif |title=The Stage: Miss Cowl's Ambition |magazine=[[Neale's Monthly]]|date=August 1913 |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=205–206}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |first=Burns |last=Mantle |authorlink=Burns Mantle |title=Contemporary American Playwrights |publisher=Dodd, Mead & Company |location=New York |year=1938}}
* {{Cite book |first=Burns |last=Mantle |author-link=Burns Mantle |title=Contemporary American Playwrights |publisher=Dodd, Mead & Company |location=New York |year=1938}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |first=Ben Iden |last=Payne |title=A Life in a Wooden O: Memoirs of the Theatre |publisher=Yale University Press |location=New Haven |year=1977 |isbn=0-300-02064-3 |oclc=2543000}}
* {{Cite book |first=Ben Iden |last=Payne |title=A Life in a Wooden O: Memoirs of the Theatre |publisher=Yale University Press |location=New Haven |year=1977 |isbn=978-0-300-02064-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/lifeinwoodeno00beni}}
* {{Cite book |first1=Andrew |last1=Pike |first2=Ross |last2=Cooper |title=Australian Film 1900–1977: A Guide to Feature Film Production |location=Melbourne |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1998 |edition=2nd |isbn=978-0-19-550784-3 |name-list-style=amp}}
* {{Cite journal |ref=harv |first=Walter |last=Reynolds |title=Bayard Veiller: The Man Who Stuck |work=The Green Book Magazine |date=March 1914 |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=447–451}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |first=Bayard |last=Veiller |title=The Fun I've Had |publisher=Cornwall Press |location=Cornwall, New York |year=2010 |origyear=1941 |isbn=978-1-4344-0659-0}}
* {{Cite magazine |first=Walter |last=Reynolds |title=Bayard Veiller: The Man Who Stuck |magazine=The Green Book Magazine |date=March 1914 |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=447–451}}
* {{Cite journal |ref=harv |first=Rennold |last=Wolf |title=Some New Chronicles of Broadway |work=The Green Book Magazine |date=January 1915 |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=145–151}}
* {{Cite book |first=Bayard |last=Veiller |title=The Fun I've Had |publisher=Cornwall Press |location=Cornwall, New York |date=2010 |orig-date=1941 |isbn=978-1-4344-0659-0}}
* {{Cite magazine |first=Rennold |last=Wolf |title=Some New Chronicles of Broadway |magazine=The Green Book Magazine |date=January 1915 |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=145–151}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |title=Television Specials: 5,336 Entertainment Programs, 1936–2012 |first=Vincent |last=Terrace |publisher=McFarland & Company |location=Jefferson, North Carolina |year=2013 |edition=2nd |isbn=978-0-7864-7444-8 |oclc=844373010}}
* {{Cite book |title=Television Specials: 5,336 Entertainment Programs, 1936–2012 |first=Vincent |last=Terrace |publisher=McFarland & Company |location=Jefferson, North Carolina |date=2013 |edition=2nd |isbn=978-0-7864-7444-8}}


==External links==
==External links==
{{Commons category|Within the Law}}
{{Commons category|Within the Law}}
*{{Theatricalia|2g5|Within the Law}}
* {{Internet Archive|id=withinlawamelod01veilgoog|name=Within the Law}}
*{{IBDB show|9427|Within the Law}}
* {{Theatricalia|2g5|Within the Law}}
* {{IBDB show|9427|Within the Law}}
*[http://www.gutenberg.org/files/905/905-h/905-h.htm Text of the novelization] at [[Project Gutenberg]]
* {{Gutenberg|no=905|name=Within the Law}} – text of the novelization


{{DEFAULTSORT:Within the Law}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Within the Law}}
Line 157: Line 156:
[[Category:Broadway plays]]
[[Category:Broadway plays]]
[[Category:American plays adapted into films]]
[[Category:American plays adapted into films]]
[[Category:Plays by Bayard Veiller]]

Latest revision as of 18:38, 13 August 2023

Within the Law
Black and white photo of five men and a woman on a stage built to look like the interior of an elegant home.
Advertising postcard for Within the Law
Written byBayard Veiller
Date premieredSeptember 11, 1912 (1912-09-11)[a]
Place premieredEltinge 42nd Street Theatre
Original languageEnglish
GenreDrama

Within the Law is a play written by Bayard Veiller. It is the story of Mary Turner, a sales clerk who is wrongly accused of stealing and sent to prison. Upon her release, Turner sets up a gang that engages in shady activities that are just "within the law". After the police try to entrap her, she is mistakenly accused again, this time for murder, but she is vindicated when the real killer confesses.

Veiller used his experience as a crime reporter to develop the play, but he was initially unable to find a producer for it. He finally settled on selling the rights to the play, along with two others he had written, for a fixed fee. After an unsuccessful run in Chicago, it became a huge hit on Broadway in 1912–1913, running for 541 performances. It was subsequently performed by multiple road companies and adapted as a movie five times. Although it was one of the biggest hits of its era, Veiller got relatively little income from it due to his decision to sell it for a lump sum.

Plot

[edit]
Black and white photo of a white man with a mustache, wearing a suit.
Bayard Veiller wrote the play in 1911.

In the first act, department store owner Edward Gilder learns that one of his former sales clerks, Mary Turner, has been convicted for stealing and given a three-year prison sentence. Gilder is pleased because he had asked the judge to make her an "example" to other employees. Turner asks to speak with Gilder before she goes to prison. While Gilder waits for her arrival, his store detective detains another woman, a customer, for stealing. This woman is the wife of a prominent banker, so rather than have her arrested, Gilder apologizes to her and lets her go. Turner arrives and tells Gilder she has been wrongly convicted. Although she says she never stole, she pleads with Gilder to increase the wages of his clerks, so no one who works there will be forced to steal. Gilder rejects her arguments, and she leaves for prison swearing revenge on him for his treatment of her.

After being released from prison, Turner sets up a gang that engages in shady activities that are just within the boundaries of the law. She also marries Gilder's son. A member of the gang attempts to rob the home of Turner's new father-in-law at the urging of a police stooge attempting to entrap the gang. When the stooge reveals the plot, the gang member kills him, leaving Turner and her new husband at the scene to be found by the police. It seems that Turner may go to prison again, but she is saved when the guilty party confesses that she had no involvement in the crimes.[1][b]

History

[edit]
Black and white photo of a white man in a three-piece suit with glasses and a hat.
William A. Brady mounted the first production in Chicago.

Veiller began writing the play under the title The Miracle, which he later revised to The Case of Mary Turner and finally to Within the Law. In 1911 he took it to the Selwyn brothers (Archie and Edgar Selwyn), who brokered plays, to find a producer for it. Several prominent producers considered it, including David Belasco, George M. Cohan, Charles Frohman, Sam Harris, and Henry Wilson Savage. It was repeatedly rejected. The production duo of Louis Dreyfus and Herman Fellner took an option on the play, but they ran into financial difficulties and the option lapsed.[2][3][4] Seeing few prospects for his work, Veiller offered to sell the rights to Within the Law and two other plays to the Selwyns for a flat fee of $3,750 (about $89,000 in 2023 dollars).[c] They were reluctant to accept this offer, fearing that they would be seen as exploiting an author in financial difficulty, but they eventually agreed.[2]

Soon after the Selwyns purchased it, the play attracted the interest of producer William A. Brady. Brady thought the lead role would good for his wife, actress Grace George. She decided not to take the part, but Brady continued with the production anyway. Brady asked writer and theater manager George Broadhurst to make some script revisions. Brady's production opened at the Princess Theatre in Chicago on April 6, 1912.[5] After a few weeks of unsuccessful results, Brady was disillusioned with the play and offered to sell the rights back to the Selwyns. Brady closed the Chicago production on June 22, 1912. The Selwyn brothers bought it back under the auspices of one of their businesses, the American Play Company. They were joined by several partners: Lee Shubert (who already had a share of the play as Brady's partner on the Chicago production), A. H. Woods, and Crosby Gaige. They paid Brady $10,000, which was enough to cover his costs for the Chicago production, but a tiny fraction of what the play would later earn.[2][3][4][5]

Black and white photo of a theater with a vaulted ceiling and an ornate curtain in front of the stage.
Within the Law was the debut play for the newly built Eltinge Theatre.

Woods brought the play to his newly built Eltinge 42nd Street Theatre in New York, where it was the venue's debut production. The show opened on September 11, 1912. Holbrook Blinn directed the production and used Veiller's original script without the changes made by Broadhurst. It was the biggest hit of the 1912–1913 Broadway season. It ran for 541 performances and did not close until December 1913.[5][6] After flubbing an important line on opening night, an actress bemoaned to Veiller that she had "ruined" his play. Reflecting on the production's critical and financial success in his autobiography, Veiller wished that more actresses had "ruined" his plays in this way.[7] After the production closed at the Eltinge, multiple road companies were launched. Nine different companies toured North America, while another opened in the United Kingdom.[2]

Because he sold his rights for a fixed fee, Veiller earned no royalties. Since the Selwyns did not want to develop a reputation for taking advantage of authors, they offered him a stipend of $100 per week for the Broadway run and $50 per week for each road company.[2] Within the Law was Veiller's first hit as a playwright.[4][8]

A Broadway revival was staged in 1928, with Clifford Brook and Mabel Brownell directing. It opened at the Cosmopolitan Theatre on March 5, 1928, and closed after 16 performances.[9]

Cast and characters

[edit]

The play's protagonist and lead female role is Mary Turner, a shopgirl who becomes a criminal mastermind. Grace George initially accepted the part for the Chicago production, but changed her mind during rehearsals and decided she did not want to play the leader of a criminal gang. Emily Stevens took on the role instead.[2]

For the Broadway production, Jane Cowl was cast as Turner. Cowl specialized in portraying tearful women[10] and considered her skills well-adapted for the role.[11] Helen Ware filled in for Cowl when she took a brief vacation from the production's long run.[12]

Actor William B. Mack appeared in both the Chicago and Broadway productions, both times playing Joe Garson, the gang member responsible for the shooting.

The characters and cast from the Broadway production are given below:

Black and white full-length portrait of Jane Cowl.
Jane Cowl, Within the Law
A man kneeling on a couch holds the arm of a woman who is leaning against the couch, facing away from him.
Orme Caldara with Jane Cowl in a scene from the Broadway production
Character Broadway first run cast[13] 1928 Broadway revival[14]
Tom Tupper Edward Bolton
Richard Gilder Orme Caldara Charles Ray
Dacey John Camp
Mary Turner Jane Cowl;
Helen Ware[12]
Violet Heming
Thomas Arthur Ebbetts
Eddie Griggs Kenneth Hill Stanley Logan
Dan Frederick Howe
George Demarest Brandon Hurst
Sarah Georgia Lawrence
Joe Garson William B. Mack Robert Warwick
Edward Gilder Dodson Mitchell
Agnes Lynch Florence Nash Claudette Colbert
Williams Joseph Nickson
William Irwin William A. Norton
"Chicago Red" Arthur Paulding
Smithson S. V. Phillips
Inspector Burke Wilton Taylor Frank Shannon
Helen Morris Catherine Tower Peggy Allenby
Fannie Martha White
Detective Sergeant Cassidy John Willard

Reception

[edit]
Black and white advertisement showing three women and a man onstage.
An advertisement for the play at the Eltinge Theatre promoted it as a "brilliant success".

Reviews

[edit]

The Broadway production received positive reviews. The reviewer for The New York Times called it "an exciting entertainment of the most vivid kind", praising the writing and the performances.[1] A review in Brooklyn Life called the story "extremely interesting and well told" and said there was "not a weak spot in the cast".[15] In Everybody's Magazine, drama critic Clayton Hamilton called it "a genuine achievement" that was "tightly constructed, tersely written, and admirably acted".[16]

Box office

[edit]

Although it received positive reviews, the Chicago production was not a commercial success.

The New York Times review of the Broadway production predicted that the play was "sure of being extremely successful".[1] This prediction was accurate, as the show became a huge hit. The opening night had multiple curtain calls, and by the second night the theater was so packed that Veiller could not enter to watch the performance.[7] In 1914, Walter Reynolds called it "the greatest success of any modern melodrama produced in the metropolis",[5] and in 1915, theater journalist Rennold Wolf said it was possibly "the most profitable play of our generation".[3] By 1917, productions in the United States had taken in revenues of about $2.44 million ($38.2 million in 2023 dollars).[c][17]

Adaptations

[edit]
Advertisement for Within the Law
An advertising circular for the 1917 movie adaptation starring Alice Joyce

Movies

[edit]

The play was adapted as a movie five different times from 1916 to 1939. In 1916, the Australian production company J. C. Williamson Ltd became the first to adapt the play, which they had previously produced for the stage in several Australian cities.[18] The stage productions included several actors who had performed the play in the United States, such as Canadian actress Muriel Starr as Turner.[19] Starr kept role for the film, which also kept Within the Law as its title. Director Monte Luke filmed mostly on the stage of the Theatre Royal in Melbourne.[20]

Lobby card for Within the Law
Lobby card for the 1923 adaptation starring Norma Talmadge

The first American adaptation came the following year, also under the title Within the Law. William P. S. Earle directed the silent film for the Vitagraph Company of America. Alice Joyce played Turner. The last of the silent film adaptations, again titled Within the Law, came in 1923. Popular star Norma Talmadge produced and played Turner; Frank Lloyd directed.

In 1930, the first sound film adaptation used the title Paid. Sam Wood directed the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) production. MGM star Joan Crawford played Turner. MGM also produced the final adaptation of the play in 1939. Within the Law was restored as the title. Czech filmmaker Gustav Machatý directed, with Ruth Hussey starring as Turner.

Other adaptations

[edit]

In 1913, H.K. Fly published a novelization of the play, written by Marvin Dana.[21]

The play was adapted for television as an episode of Broadway Television Theatre that aired on June 2, 1952.[22]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Premier information is for the Broadway production.
  2. ^ Plot details are based on the Broadway production. Revisions to the script were made for the Chicago production, which were removed for later productions.
  3. ^ a b Johnston, Louis; Williamson, Samuel H. (2023). "What Was the U.S. GDP Then?". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved November 30, 2023. United States Gross Domestic Product deflator figures follow the MeasuringWorth series.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c "Within the Law a Vivid Melodrama". The New York Times. September 12, 1912.
  2. ^ a b c d e f "The Luck of Bayard Veiller" (PDF). The New York Times. December 10, 1916.
  3. ^ a b c Wolf 1915, p. 147
  4. ^ a b c Mantle 1938, p. 277
  5. ^ a b c d Reynolds 1914, pp. 450–451
  6. ^ Henderson & Greene 2008, pp. 147–148
  7. ^ a b Veiller 2010, pp. 202–203
  8. ^ Kabatchnik 2009, pp. 124–125
  9. ^ Fisher & Londre 2008, p. 522
  10. ^ Payne 1977, p. 130
  11. ^ Cowl 1914, pp. 443–445
  12. ^ a b Kilgarif 1913, p. 206
  13. ^ "Within the Law". Internet Broadway Database. Retrieved March 28, 2014.
  14. ^ "Within the Law". Internet Broadway Database. Retrieved March 28, 2014.
  15. ^ "Plays and Players". Brooklyn Life. Vol. 46, no. 1177. September 21, 1912. pp. 7, 32 – via Newspapers.com.
  16. ^ Hamilton, Clayton (November 1912). "The Players: Within the Law". Everybody's Magazine. p. 675.
  17. ^ "The Silent Drama" (PDF). The Sunday Oregonian. Vol. 36, no. 22. June 3, 1917. p. 4.5.
  18. ^ "J. C. Williamson Limited". AusStage. Retrieved April 11, 2016.
  19. ^ "Amusements". The Advertiser. Vol. 56, no. 17, 109. Adelaide. August 16, 1913. p. 22.
  20. ^ Pike & Cooper 1998, p. 58
  21. ^ "Within the Law ... From the play of Bayard Veiller". WorldCat. Retrieved March 28, 2014.
  22. ^ Terrace 2013, p. 69

Works cited

[edit]
  • Cowl, Jane (March 1914). "The Sob Part". The Green Book Magazine. Vol. 11, no. 3. pp. 441–446.
  • Fisher, James & Londre, Felicia Hardison (2008). The A to Z of American Theater: Modernism. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-8108-6884-7.
  • Henderson, Mary C. & Greene, Alexis (2008). The Story of 42nd Street: The Theaters, Shows, Characters, and Scandals of the World's Most Notorious Street. Back Stage Books. ISBN 978-0-8230-3072-9.
  • Kabatchnik, Amnon (2009). Blood on the Stage, 1925–1950: Milestone Plays of Crime, Mystery, and Detection. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-6963-9.
  • Kilgarif (August 1913). "The Stage: Miss Cowl's Ambition". Neale's Monthly. Vol. 2, no. 2. pp. 205–206.
  • Mantle, Burns (1938). Contemporary American Playwrights. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.
  • Payne, Ben Iden (1977). A Life in a Wooden O: Memoirs of the Theatre. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-02064-9.
  • Pike, Andrew & Cooper, Ross (1998). Australian Film 1900–1977: A Guide to Feature Film Production (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-550784-3.
  • Reynolds, Walter (March 1914). "Bayard Veiller: The Man Who Stuck". The Green Book Magazine. Vol. 11, no. 3. pp. 447–451.
  • Veiller, Bayard (2010) [1941]. The Fun I've Had. Cornwall, New York: Cornwall Press. ISBN 978-1-4344-0659-0.
  • Wolf, Rennold (January 1915). "Some New Chronicles of Broadway". The Green Book Magazine. Vol. 13, no. 1. pp. 145–151.
  • Terrace, Vincent (2013). Television Specials: 5,336 Entertainment Programs, 1936–2012 (2nd ed.). Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. ISBN 978-0-7864-7444-8.
[edit]