Jump to content

Semantic primes: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Rescuing 3 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5) (Лисан аль-Гаиб - 14792
Precise target, r with history
Tags: Redirect target changed 2017 wikitext editor
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
⚫
#REDIRECT [[Natural semantic metalanguage#Semantic primes]]
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the discussion has been closed. -->

{{Article for deletion/dated|page=Semantic primes|timestamp=20230830020810|year=2023|month=August|day=30|substed=yes}}
{{Rcat shell|
<!-- Once discussion is closed, please place on talk page: {{Old AfD multi|page=Semantic primes|date=30 August 2023|result='''keep'''}} -->
{{R to related topic}}
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
{{R with history}}
{{Short description|Innate semantic concepts}}
{{multiple issues|
{{essay-like|date=November 2009}}
{{duplication|dupe=Natural_semantic_metalanguage|date=March 2013}}
}}
}}

'''Semantic primes''' or '''semantic primitives''' are a set of semantic concepts<ref name="Words and Meanings"/> that are argued to be innately understood by all people but impossible to express in simpler terms. They represent words or phrases that are learned through practice but cannot be defined concretely. For example, although the meaning of "touching" is readily understood, a dictionary might define "touch" as "to make contact" and "contact" as "touching", providing no information if neither of these words is understood. The concept of universal semantic primes was largely introduced by [[Anna Wierzbicka]]'s book, ''Semantics: Primes and Universals''.

==List of semantic primes==
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Category !! Primes
|-
| [[Noun substantive|Substantive]]s || I, you, someone, people, something/thing, body
|-
| Relational substantives || Kind, part
|-
| [[Determiner (linguistics)|Determiners]] || This, the same, other~else~another
|-
| [[Quantifier (linguistics)|Quantifiers]] || One, two, some, all, much/many, little/few
|-
| Evaluators || Good, bad
|-
| Descriptors || Big, small
|-
| Mental [[predicate (grammar)|predicate]]s || Think, know, want, don't want, feel, see, hear
|-
| [[Speech]] || Say, words, true
|-
| [[wikt:action|Actions]], [[wikt:event|events]], [[motion (physics)|movement]] || Do, happen, move
|-
| [[Existence]], [[Ownership|possession]] || Be (somewhere), there is, be (someone/something), (is) mine
|-
| Life and death || Live, die
|-
| Time || When/time, now, before, after, a long time, a short time, for some time, moment
|-
| Space || Where/place, here, above, below, far, near, side, inside, touch (contact)
|-
| Logical concepts || Not, maybe, can, because, if
|-
| [[Intensifier]], augmentor || Very, more
|-
| Similarity || Like/as/way
|}
Table adapted from Levisen and Waters 2017<ref name="Cultural Keywords">{{Cite book|title=Cultural Keywords in Discourse|last=Carsten Levisen|first=Sophia Waters|publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company|year=2017|isbn=9789027256829}}</ref> and Goddard and Wierzbicka 2014.<ref name="Words and Meanings">{{Cite book|title=Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages and Cultures|last=Cliff Goddard|first=Anna Wierzbicka|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2014|isbn=978-0-19-966843-4|location=Oxford}}</ref>

==A universal ''syntax'' of meaning==
Semantic primes represent universally meaningful ''concepts'', but to have meaningful ''messages'', or ''statements'', such concepts must combine in a way that they themselves convey meaning. Such meaningful combinations, in their simplest form as sentences, constitute the ''syntax'' of the language. Wierzbicka provides evidence that just as all languages use the same set of semantic primes, they also use the same or very similar syntax. She states: "I am also positing certain innate and universal rules of syntax – not in the sense of some intuitively unverifiable formal syntax à la Chomsky, but in the sense of intuitively verifiable patterns determining possible combinations of primitive concepts (Wierzbicka, 1996)." She gives one example comparing the English sentence, "I want to do this", with its equivalent in Russian. Although she notes certain formal differences between the two sentence structures, their semantic equivalence emerges from the "....equivalence of the primitives themselves and of the rules for their combination."

<blockquote>This work [of Wierzbicka and colleagues] has led to a set of highly concrete proposals about a hypothesized irreducible core of all human languages. This universal core is believed to have a fully ‘language-like’ character in the sense that it consists of a lexicon of semantic primitives together with a syntax governing how the primitives can be combined (Goddard, 1998).</blockquote>

It may not be surprising that all humans today possess a common language core of semantic primes and a more or less universal syntax since there is substantial evidence that all humans today descended from a common speech-enabled [[Y-chromosomal Adam|male]] and [[Mitochondrial Eve|female]] ''Homo sapiens'' ancestor. {{citation needed|date=December 2019}} Linguist [[Johanna Nichols]] traces ''Homo sapiens'' language origin as far back as 130,000 years ago, perhaps only 65,000 years after the earliest ''Homo sapiens'' fossil finds (Adler, 2000). Philosopher G. J. Whitrow expresses it:

<blockquote>....despite the great diversity of existing languages and dialect, the capacity for language appears to be identical in all races. Consequently, we can conclude that man's linguistic ability existed before racial diversification occurred (Whitrow, 1988).</blockquote>

==Natural semantic metalanguage==
{{main|Natural semantic metalanguage}}

In effect, the combination of a set of semantic primes each representing a different basic concept, residing in minds with a propensity to acquire certain basic concepts, and a common set of rules for combining those concepts into meaningful messages, constitutes a natural semantic prime language, or [[natural semantic metalanguage]]. In English, the natural semantic metalanguage reduces language to a core that enables full development of the English language. A new word can be added as a shorthand substitute for a 'text' in the natural semantic metalanguage, a 'text' that can convey what English speakers mean by ''lie'', by ''what a person does when he says something not true because he wants someone to think it true''. Any English word can be described (defined) with a text using a primitive lexicon of about 60 words (concepts) in the English natural semantic metalanguage. {{citation needed|date=December 2019}} Likewise can any complex semantic sentence in English be paraphrased reductively to the core words and syntax of the natural semantic metalanguage. {{citation needed|date=December 2019}} The texts can make subtle distinctions English-speakers make between ''happy'', ''glad'', ''joyful'', ''ecstatic'', etc., and can supply those distinctions to those who want to know them.

Given the universal nature of the list of semantic primes among languages, and of the grammar, every language has essentially the same natural semantic metalanguage, though each semantic prime sounds different among languages and the appearance of the syntax may differ. Wierzbicka and colleagues refer to all the natural semantic metalanguages as 'isomorphic' with each other. {{citation needed|date=December 2019}} Conceivably, if the dictionary of meaning descriptions of each language was reductively paraphrased in the text of its natural semantic metalanguage, and that natural semantic metalanguage was translated to a common natural semantic metalanguage for all natural languages, it would greatly reduce language barriers.

== See also ==
* [[Universal grammar]]
* [[Core ontology]]
* [[Linguistic universal]]
⚫
* [[Natural semantic metalanguage]]
* [[Swadesh list]]

==Notes==
{{reflist}}

==References==
{{refbegin}}
*{{Citizendium}}
*Adler R. (2000) [https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16522274.500-voices-from-the-past.html “Voices from the past”] ''New Scientist'', 26 February.
*Goddard C. (1998) Bad arguments against semantic primitives. ''Theoretical Linguistics'' 24:129-156. [http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/347394/bad-arguments.pdf View/Download PDF of article] [Goddard: "''....this paper is heterogenous in nature and polemical in purpose....''"]
*Goddard C. (2002) The search for the shared semantic core of all languages. In Cliff Goddard and Anna Wierzbicka (eds). ''Meaning and Universal Grammar - Theory and Empirical Findings''. Volume I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp.&nbsp;5–40. [http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/347542/goddard-2002.pdf View/Download PDF of the book chapter] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307104823/https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/347542/goddard-2002.pdf |date=2016-03-07 }}
*Goddard C., Wierzbicka A. (eds.) (1994) ''Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings''. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [http://www.benjamins.com/cgi-bin/t_bookview.cgi?bookid=SLCS%2025 Publisher’s website’s description of book, with Table of Contents]
*Whitrow GJ. (1988) ''Time in History: The evolution of our general awareness of time and temporal perspective.'' Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0-19-215361-7}}. p.&nbsp;11.
*Wierzbicka A. (1996) Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0-19-870002-4}}. [http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780198700036 Publisher's website's description of book] [http://languages.anu.edu.au/staff/professor-anna-wierzbicka Professor Wierzbicka’s faculty webpage] [https://books.google.com/books?id=ZN029Pmbnu4C Excerpts from Chapters 1 and 2]
{{refend}}

==External links==
*[http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/347525/goddard-wierzbicka-applied-nsm.pdf Goddard C, Wierzbicka A (2007) ''Semantic Primes and Cultural Scripts in Language Learning and Intercultural Communication''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160224213756/https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/347525/goddard-wierzbicka-applied-nsm.pdf |date=2016-02-24 }}. PDF
*[http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/347542/goddard-2002.pdf Goddard, Cliff. 2002. The search for the shared semantic core of all languages.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307104823/https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/347542/goddard-2002.pdf |date=2016-03-07 }} In Cliff Goddard and Anna Wierzbicka (eds). ''Meaning and Universal Grammar - Theory and Empirical Findings''. Volume I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp.&nbsp;5–40.
*[https://intranet.secure.griffith.edu.au/schools-departments/natural-semantic-metalanguage The Natural Semantics Metalanguage]

[[Category:Semantics]]
[[Category:Pragmatics]]

Latest revision as of 08:49, 6 September 2023

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Semantic_primes&oldid=1174096071"