Jump to content

Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
citation tweaks
top: add "use mdy dates" template
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}
{{Infobox SCOTUS case
{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.
|Litigants=Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.
Line 12: Line 13:
|Subsequent=
|Subsequent=
|Holding=An inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.
|Holding=An inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.
|SCOTUS=1932-1937
|Majority=Sutherland
|Majority=Sutherland
|JoinMajority=
|JoinMajority=
Line 31: Line 31:


==Background==
==Background==
Pacific Western Oil Corporation was established by Edward L. Doherty in 1928 before later coming under the control of [[J. Paul Getty]] and owned oil and gas drilling rights for large sections of [[Fresno County, California]]. An agricultural landowner had [[Mineral rights|"mining" rights]] for the same area and sued. The oil companies asserted that, since their leases were issued by the [[United States Secretary of State]], that they could not be sued without including the U.S. government but the court disagreed.
[[Pacific Western Oil Corporation]] was established by Edward L. Doherty in 1928 before later coming under the control of [[J. Paul Getty]] and owned oil and gas drilling rights for large sections of [[Fresno County, California]]. An agricultural landowner had [[Mineral rights|"mining" rights]] for the same area and sued. The oil companies asserted that, since their leases were issued by the [[United States Secretary of State]], that they could not be sued without including the U.S. government but the court disagreed.


==See also==
==See also==
Line 37: Line 37:


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
*{{cite journal |last=Colby |first=Wm. E. |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1942 |month= |title=The Law of Oil and Gas: With Special Reference to the Public Domain and Conservation |journal=California Law Review |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=245–271 |doi=10.2307/3477673 |jstor= 3477673}}
*{{cite journal |last=Colby |first=Wm. E. |year=1942 |title=The Law of Oil and Gas: With Special Reference to the Public Domain and Conservation |journal=California Law Review |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=245–271 |doi=10.2307/3477673 |jstor= 3477673}}
{{wikisource|Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Company}}
{{wikisource|Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Company}}
{{caselaw source
{{caselaw source
Line 43: Line 43:
| courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/102695/bourdieu-v-pacific-western-oil-co/
| courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/102695/bourdieu-v-pacific-western-oil-co/
| findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/299/65.html
| findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/299/65.html
| googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13956730321487571495
| justia = https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/299/65/
| justia = https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/299/65/
}}
}}
Line 54: Line 55:
[[Category:Petroleum in California]]
[[Category:Petroleum in California]]
[[Category:Oil and gas law]]
[[Category:Oil and gas law]]
[[Category:United States lawsuits]]





Latest revision as of 01:51, 13 September 2023

Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.
Argued October 12, 1936
Decided November 9, 1936
Full case nameBourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.
Citations299 U.S. 65 (more)
57 S. Ct. 51; 81 L. Ed. 42
Holding
An inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
Willis Van Devanter · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · George Sutherland
Pierce Butler · Harlan F. Stone
Owen Roberts · Benjamin N. Cardozo
Case opinion
MajoritySutherland
Stone took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co., 299 U.S. 65 (1936), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that an inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.

Background

[edit]

Pacific Western Oil Corporation was established by Edward L. Doherty in 1928 before later coming under the control of J. Paul Getty and owned oil and gas drilling rights for large sections of Fresno County, California. An agricultural landowner had "mining" rights for the same area and sued. The oil companies asserted that, since their leases were issued by the United States Secretary of State, that they could not be sued without including the U.S. government but the court disagreed.

See also

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
  • Colby, Wm. E. (1942). "The Law of Oil and Gas: With Special Reference to the Public Domain and Conservation". California Law Review. 30 (3): 245–271. doi:10.2307/3477673. JSTOR 3477673.

Text of Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co., 299 U.S. 65 (1936) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia