Commissioner v. Wilcox: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→top: add "use mdy dates" template |
|||
(22 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}} |
|||
{{SCOTUSCase |
|||
{{Infobox SCOTUS case |
|||
|Litigants=Commissioner v. Wilcox |
|Litigants=Commissioner v. Wilcox |
||
|ArgueDate=January 8 |
|ArgueDate=January 8 |
||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
|USVol=327 |
|USVol=327 |
||
|USPage=404 |
|USPage=404 |
||
| |
|ParallelCitations=66 S. Ct. 546; 90 [[Lawyers' Edition|L. Ed.]] 752; 1946 [[LexisNexis|U.S. LEXIS]] 3084; 46-1 [[CCH (company)|U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH)]] ¶ 9188; 34 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 811; 1946-1 C.B. 6; 166 [[American Law Reports|A.L.R.]] 884; 1946 P.H. P72,014 |
||
|Prior=Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
|Prior=Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
||
|Subsequent= |
|Subsequent= |
||
|Holding= |
|Holding= |
||
|SCOTUS=1945-1946 |
|||
|Majority=Murphy |
|Majority=Murphy |
||
|JoinMajority=Stone, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Rutledge |
|JoinMajority=Stone, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Rutledge |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|NotParticipating=Jackson |
|NotParticipating=Jackson |
||
|LawsApplied=§ 22 (a) of the [[Internal Revenue Code]] |
|LawsApplied=§ 22 (a) of the [[Internal Revenue Code]] |
||
|Overruled=''[[James v. United States]]'', 366 U.S. 213 (1961) |
|Overruled=''[[James v. United States (1961)|James v. United States]]'', 366 U.S. 213 (1961) |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''''Commissioner v. Wilcox''''', |
'''''Commissioner v. Wilcox''''', 327 U.S. 404 (1946), was a case decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]].<ref>{{ussc|name=Commissioner v. Wilcox|link=|volume=327|page=404|pin=|year=1946}}.</ref> |
||
The issue presented in this case was whether embezzled money constituted taxable income to the embezzler under § 22(a) of the [[Internal Revenue Code of 1939]]. |
The issue presented in this case was whether [[Embezzlement|embezzled]] money constituted taxable income to the embezzler under § 22(a) of the [[Internal Revenue Code of 1939]]. |
||
Although the Court ruled that the embezzlement income was not taxable to the embezzler in ''Wilcox'', the Court later overruled |
Although the Court ruled that the embezzlement income was not taxable to the embezzler in ''Wilcox'', the Court later overruled the decision in ''[[James v. United States (1961)|James v. United States]]''. |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
*[[Taxation of illegal income in the United States]] |
|||
*[[List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 327]] |
*[[List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 327]] |
||
==References== |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
*{{cite journal |last=Gilbert |first=J. H. |
*{{cite journal |last=Gilbert |first=J. H. Jr. |year=1962 |title=Problems Resulting from Taxation of Embezzled Funds |journal=Florida Law Review |volume=15 |pages=98 |issn=1045-4241 }} |
||
*{{cite journal |last=Grow |first=J. |
*{{cite journal |last=Grow |first=J. |year=1961 |title=An Historical Approach to the Concept of Income Taxation of Embezzled Funds |journal=Alabama Law Review |volume=14 |pages=91 |issn=0002-4279 }} |
||
*{{cite journal |last=Landisman |first=Joseph |
*{{cite journal |last=Landisman |first=Joseph |year=1946 |title=Embezzled Funds as Income |journal=[[California Law Review]] |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=449–452 |doi=10.2307/3477187|publisher=California Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 2 |jstor= 3477187 }} |
||
*{{cite journal |last=Solomon |first=Milton D. |
*{{cite journal |last=Solomon |first=Milton D. |year=1946 |title=Embezzled Funds as Income |journal=[[Michigan Law Review]] |volume=44 |issue=5 |pages=885–888 |doi=10.2307/1283700|publisher=Michigan Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 5 |jstor= 1283700 |url=https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol44/iss5/26 }} |
||
==External links== |
|||
*{{wikisource-inline|Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox}} |
|||
*{{caselaw source |
|||
| case = ''Commissioner v. Wilcox'', {{ussc|327|404|1946|el=no}} |
|||
| cornell =https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/327/404 |
|||
| courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/104252/commissioner-v-wilcox/ |
|||
| googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12091298825335103420 |
|||
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/327/404/ |
|||
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep327/usrep327404/usrep327404.pdf |
|||
}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wilcox}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wilcox}} |
||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]] |
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]] |
||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Stone Court]] |
|||
[[Category:United States taxation and revenue case law]] |
[[Category:United States taxation and revenue case law]] |
||
[[Category:1946 in law]] |
[[Category:1946 in United States case law]] |
||
[[Category:Embezzlement]] |
|||
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} |
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} |
||
{{Tax-stub}} |
Latest revision as of 02:00, 13 September 2023
Commissioner v. Wilcox | |
---|---|
Argued January 8, 1946 Decided February 25, 1946 | |
Full case name | Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox, et al. |
Citations | 327 U.S. 404 (more) 66 S. Ct. 546; 90 L. Ed. 752; 1946 U.S. LEXIS 3084; 46-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) ¶ 9188; 34 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 811; 1946-1 C.B. 6; 166 A.L.R. 884; 1946 P.H. P72,014 |
Case history | |
Prior | Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Murphy, joined by Stone, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Rutledge |
Dissent | Burton |
Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
§ 22 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code | |
Overruled by | |
James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213 (1961) |
Commissioner v. Wilcox, 327 U.S. 404 (1946), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.[1]
The issue presented in this case was whether embezzled money constituted taxable income to the embezzler under § 22(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.
Although the Court ruled that the embezzlement income was not taxable to the embezzler in Wilcox, the Court later overruled the decision in James v. United States.
See also
[edit]- Taxation of illegal income in the United States
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 327
References
[edit]Further reading
[edit]- Gilbert, J. H. Jr. (1962). "Problems Resulting from Taxation of Embezzled Funds". Florida Law Review. 15: 98. ISSN 1045-4241.
- Grow, J. (1961). "An Historical Approach to the Concept of Income Taxation of Embezzled Funds". Alabama Law Review. 14: 91. ISSN 0002-4279.
- Landisman, Joseph (1946). "Embezzled Funds as Income". California Law Review. 34 (2). California Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 2: 449–452. doi:10.2307/3477187. JSTOR 3477187.
- Solomon, Milton D. (1946). "Embezzled Funds as Income". Michigan Law Review. 44 (5). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 5: 885–888. doi:10.2307/1283700. JSTOR 1283700.
External links
[edit]- Works related to Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox at Wikisource
- Text of Commissioner v. Wilcox, 327 U.S. 404 (1946) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress