Jump to content

Witherspoon v. Illinois: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
added library of congress source for scan of U.S. Reports
top: add "use mdy dates" template
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}
{{Infobox SCOTUS case
{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Witherspoon v. Illinois
|Litigants=Witherspoon v. Illinois
Line 5: Line 6:
|DecideDate=June 3
|DecideDate=June 3
|DecideYear=1968
|DecideYear=1968
|FullName=Witherspoon v. Illinois
|FullName=William C. Witherspoon v. The People of the State of Illinois
|USVol=391
|USVol=391
|USPage=510
|USPage=510
Line 12: Line 13:
|Subsequent=
|Subsequent=
|Holding=Stacking the jury with only jurors who would choose the death penalty violates the Sixth Amendment because it is not an impartial jury or a cross-section of the community.
|Holding=Stacking the jury with only jurors who would choose the death penalty violates the Sixth Amendment because it is not an impartial jury or a cross-section of the community.
|SCOTUS=1967-1969
|Majority=Stewart
|Majority=Stewart
|JoinMajority=Warren, Brennan, Fortas, Marshall
|JoinMajority=Warren, Brennan, Fortas, Marshall
Line 23: Line 23:
'''''Witherspoon v. Illinois''''', 391 U.S. 510 (1968), was a [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case where the court ruled that a state [[statute]] providing the state unlimited challenge for cause of [[juror]]s who might have any objection to the [[death penalty]] gave too much bias in favor of the prosecution.
'''''Witherspoon v. Illinois''''', 391 U.S. 510 (1968), was a [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case where the court ruled that a state [[statute]] providing the state unlimited challenge for cause of [[juror]]s who might have any objection to the [[death penalty]] gave too much bias in favor of the prosecution.


The Court said,
The Court said, {{Quote|Whatever else might be said of capital punishment, it is at least clear that its imposition by a [[hanging]] jury cannot be squared with the Constitution. The State of [[Illinois]] has stacked the deck against the petitioner. To execute this death sentence would deprive him of his life without due process of law.}}

{{blockquote|Whatever else might be said of capital punishment, it is at least clear that its imposition by a hanging jury cannot be squared with the Constitution. The State of [[Illinois]] has stacked the deck against the petitioner. To execute this death sentence would deprive him of his life without due process of law.}}


The decision in this case would cause the [[Supreme Court of California]] to order a retrial on the penalty phase in the 1972 case of ''[[California v. Anderson]]'', and when the case was heard for the third time, would find the imposition of the death penalty was unconstitutional on the grounds of the penalty being cruel or unusual punishment, in violation of the [[Constitution of California|State Constitution]]. The decision would become national in scale when the U.S. Supreme Court also in 1972 ruled in ''[[Furman v. Georgia]]'' that all death penalty cases were in violation of the 8th Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
The decision in this case would cause the [[Supreme Court of California]] to order a retrial on the penalty phase in the 1972 case of ''[[California v. Anderson]]'', and when the case was heard for the third time, would find the imposition of the death penalty was unconstitutional on the grounds of the penalty being cruel or unusual punishment, in violation of the [[Constitution of California|State Constitution]]. The decision would become national in scale when the U.S. Supreme Court also in 1972 ruled in ''[[Furman v. Georgia]]'' that all death penalty cases were in violation of the 8th Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

==Death==
Witherspoon died at his home in [[Detroit, Michigan]] on Sunday March 4, 1990 after a battle with cancer.<ref>{{cite news |title=William Witherspoon; Beat The Chair 15 Times |publisher=[[The Chicago Tribune]] |date=March 6, 1990}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
* [[List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 391]]
* [[List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 391]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}


==External links==
==External links==
Line 50: Line 58:
[[Category:Capital punishment in Illinois]]
[[Category:Capital punishment in Illinois]]
[[Category:1968 in United States case law]]
[[Category:1968 in United States case law]]


{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}

Latest revision as of 03:38, 13 September 2023

Witherspoon v. Illinois
Argued April 24, 1968
Decided June 3, 1968
Full case nameWilliam C. Witherspoon v. The People of the State of Illinois
Citations391 U.S. 510 (more)
88 S. Ct. 1770; 20 L. Ed. 2d 776; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1469
Holding
Stacking the jury with only jurors who would choose the death penalty violates the Sixth Amendment because it is not an impartial jury or a cross-section of the community.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Abe Fortas · Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
MajorityStewart, joined by Warren, Brennan, Fortas, Marshall
ConcurrenceDouglas
DissentBlack, joined by Harlan, White
DissentWhite
Laws applied
Ill. Rev. Stat., c. 38 s. 743, U.S. Const. amends. VI, XIV

Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968), was a U.S. Supreme Court case where the court ruled that a state statute providing the state unlimited challenge for cause of jurors who might have any objection to the death penalty gave too much bias in favor of the prosecution.

The Court said,

Whatever else might be said of capital punishment, it is at least clear that its imposition by a hanging jury cannot be squared with the Constitution. The State of Illinois has stacked the deck against the petitioner. To execute this death sentence would deprive him of his life without due process of law.

The decision in this case would cause the Supreme Court of California to order a retrial on the penalty phase in the 1972 case of California v. Anderson, and when the case was heard for the third time, would find the imposition of the death penalty was unconstitutional on the grounds of the penalty being cruel or unusual punishment, in violation of the State Constitution. The decision would become national in scale when the U.S. Supreme Court also in 1972 ruled in Furman v. Georgia that all death penalty cases were in violation of the 8th Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

Death

[edit]

Witherspoon died at his home in Detroit, Michigan on Sunday March 4, 1990 after a battle with cancer.[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "William Witherspoon; Beat The Chair 15 Times". The Chicago Tribune. March 6, 1990.
[edit]