Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhab Chandra Jena: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:38, 28 October 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was This has been going on at Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena since August 2022 and here since 2015, when it was create-protected before. There is a procession of quite obvious block-evading multiple accounts in the edit history there and at Project:Madhab Chandra Jena (sic!). It was obvious even before I got to the SPI case page. I'm deleting this on sight, revoking the account's privileges, and create protecting both this and ମାଧବ ଚନ୍ଦ୍ର ଜେନା (AfD discussion) where this turned up in a language other than English. Uncle G (talk) 14:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)‎[reply]

Madhab Chandra Jena

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could find zero reliable in-depth sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. 🌹FatCat96🌹 Chat with Cat 17:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. 🌹FatCat96🌹 Chat with Cat 17:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per GNG, the same conclusion has been raised repeatedly at Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena since January. There's also a pending SPI against the creator at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena. Belbury (talk) 18:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'd speedy this as a stub. I have no sourcing in the article either... Gsearch brings up nothing, other than a hit on the name for a person on parol from prison. Oaktree b (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There is also another version of this article created by the author AfD' at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ମାଧବ ଚନ୍ଦ୍ର ଜେନା. BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article and BEFORE are not WP:IS, WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing // Timothy :: talk 05:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:BIO, could have been moved to draft under WP:DRAFTIFY, little point though since it will not pass BIO anyway 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:55, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly check the facts before deletion.As per policy of Wikipedia the scholar criteria, books criteria and other criteria should be checked.It pains when somebody puts the allegation of undisclosed payments without facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banambar (talk • contribs) 08:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see there is no any hidden fact, peacock terms, it's written neutral point of view, if anything is there like this editors are free to remove that portion very quickly.Nothing can be perfect in very first attempt,there is always a scope for improvement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banambar (talk • contribs) 08:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly check the websites in Google,books written,scholar,wp ref,wikimedia and other images etc. part then take decisions for deletion.deletion should not be done as a doubt on somebody it should be done as per the Wikipedia criteria and policy.when I checked all the references as as sited above I feel it should not be deleted rather it should be improved by the editors like us— Preceding unsigned comment added by Banambar (talk • contribs) 08:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have edited the article to improve the structure of the article.Kindly help for improving the article further or suggest for further improvement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banambar (talk • contribs) 13:48, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Sir I have added the Wikipedia references, trying to improve the article,Kindly help with your valuable kind suggestions to improve the article further Banambar (talk) 14:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was This has been going on at [[Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena]] since August 2022 and here since 2015, when it was create-protected before.  There is a procession of quite obvious block-evading multiple accounts in the edit history there and at [[Project:Madhab Chandra Jena]] (sic!).  It was obvious even ''before'' I got to the SPI case page.  I'm deleting this on sight, revoking the account's privileges, and create protecting both this and {{On AFD|ମାଧବ ଚନ୍ଦ୍ର ଜେନା}} where this turned up in a language other than English. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 14:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__
 ===[[:Madhab Chandra Jena]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
@@ Line 9: / Line 15: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Odisha|list of Odisha-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 17:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)</small>
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India|list of India-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 17:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' per GNG, the same conclusion has been raised repeatedly at [[Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena]] since January. There's also a pending SPI against the creator at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena]]. [[User:Belbury|Belbury]] ([[User talk:Belbury|talk]]) 18:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * '''Delete''': I'd speedy this as a stub. I have no sourcing in the article either... Gsearch brings up nothing, other than a hit on the name for a person on parol from prison.  [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 19:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC) <!--VCB Oaktree b-->
@@ Line 16: / Line 21: @@
 * '''Comment''': See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena]] 🇺🇦&nbsp;[[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</small></sup>]]&nbsp;🇺🇦 06:55, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 *Kindly check the facts before deletion.As per policy of Wikipedia the scholar criteria, books criteria and other criteria should be checked.It pains when somebody puts the allegation of undisclosed payments without facts.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Banambar|Banambar]] ([[User talk:Banambar#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Banambar|contribs]]) 08:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:I see there is no any hidden fact, peacock terms, it's written neutral point of view, if anything is there like this editors are free to remove that portion very quickly.Nothing can be perfect in very first attempt,there is always a scope for improvement.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Banambar|Banambar]] ([[User talk:Banambar#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Banambar|contribs]]) 08:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+*I see there is no any hidden fact, peacock terms, it's written neutral point of view, if anything is there like this editors are free to remove that portion very quickly.Nothing can be perfect in very first attempt,there is always a scope for improvement.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Banambar|Banambar]] ([[User talk:Banambar#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Banambar|contribs]]) 08:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-Kindly check the websites in Google,books written and scholar part then take decisions for deletion.deletion should not be done as a doubt on somebody it should be done as per the Wikipedia criteria and policy.
+*Kindly check the websites in Google,books written,scholar,wp ref,wikimedia and other images etc. part then take decisions for deletion.deletion should not be done as a doubt on somebody it should be done as per the Wikipedia criteria and policy.when I checked all the references as as sited above I feel it should not be deleted rather it should be improved by the editors like us<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Banambar|Banambar]] ([[User talk:Banambar#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Banambar|contribs]]) 08:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+*I have edited the article to improve the structure of the article.Kindly help for improving the article further or suggest for further improvement.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Banambar|Banambar]] ([[User talk:Banambar#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Banambar|contribs]]) 13:48, 28 October 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+*Dear Sir I have added the Wikipedia references, trying to improve the article,Kindly help with your valuable kind suggestions to improve the article further [[User:Banambar|Banambar]] ([[User talk:Banambar|talk]]) 14:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>