User talk:Yopie: Difference between revisions
→ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message: new section Tag: |
|||
| (70 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yopie/Archives | Archive page] |
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yopie/Archives | Archive page] |
||
===Teutonic Order=== |
|||
Hi Yopie! Glad you have interest in medieval orders! Please do not revert to old article. I am busy updating with newer more up to date information, with all the latest information. Kind Regards <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shingetsutan|Shingetsutan]] ([[User talk:Shingetsutan#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shingetsutan|contribs]]) 07:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
===French Legitimist Page=== |
|||
Yopie, I see you're a monarchist. I'm surprised that you would continue to support a chart organization that clearly supports the Orleanist succession while having the audacity to accuse me of POV pushing. |
|||
The House of Bourbon is the senior branch, thus they would logically be seated above the House of Orleans. If the intent was to POV push, I would have divided it by "Bourbons/Orleans". <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:980:C100:14:29C8:C346:4202:29B|2601:980:C100:14:29C8:C346:4202:29B]] ([[User talk:2601:980:C100:14:29C8:C346:4202:29B#top|talk]]) 22:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Thanks Yopie == |
== Thanks Yopie == |
||
| Line 16: | Line 26: | ||
== RfC on which flag to use for Austria-Hungary's infobox == |
|||
== revert == |
|||
You are being invited to discuss the question of which flag to use for Austria-Hungary's infobox because you've previously participated in discussions on this topic. The discussion can be found at [[Talk:Austria-Hungary#RfC: National flags vs Civil Ensign]] [[user:White Shadows|<b style="color:#003153">White Shadows</b>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<b style="color:#DC143C">Let’s Talk</b>]]</sup> 18:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Why did you revert my entry on the list of foreign award winners of the Ordre des palm academique?? |
|||
I have been awarded this year and I have proof! |
|||
Natacha |
|||
== |
== Conversation on recent edits == |
||
Hello. I believe we need to have a detailed discussion about various edits that we have been making; this would be proper. Let us use this as one single point to communicate as this has turned into an octopus of edits! |
|||
Hi. The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge]] has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland [[Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge]]. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like [[Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)]]. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon]], sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Are we able to do this to reach a consensus? [[User:Chios historian|Chios historian]] ([[User talk:Chios historian|talk]]) 14:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Yopie. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. |
|||
::Ok. I reached out to you here because you have been active everyday but have not responded to me uploading the requested sources; that is why I reverted your banner. I simply thought you saw them, it looked good, and you carried on making edits elsewhere. It was done in good faith, I can assure you. |
|||
::I will resume waiting for your response on the aforementioned talk page. Cheers. [[User:Chios historian|Chios historian]] ([[User talk:Chios historian|talk]]) 16:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== A government in exile page == |
|||
| ⚫ | The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
||
Hello dear sir , I am parwiz ahmadi. I seen your edits in [[Government in exile]] page. I submitted an article [[Draft:United states of khorasan]]. unfortunately other admins do not know much more about a government in exile. this is about several time that several admins declined my submission and asked me that whats a government in exile? I hope you review this article , If it seems to be approved. please approve it |
|||
| ⚫ | If you wish to participate in the |
||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/11&oldid=750554570 --> |
|||
thank you so much for your cooperation [[User:Parwiz ahmadi|Parwiz ahmadi]] ([[User talk:Parwiz ahmadi|talk]]) 18:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Why Did You Revert the Following Page? == |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_historical_German_and_Czech_names_for_places_in_the_Czech_Republic&oldid=prev&diff=774900086 |
|||
:Hello, your draft is interesting, but I’m not sure that this insurgence group is government in exile. [[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie#top|talk]]) 18:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
That is equivalent of Martinez (Columbia County) and refusing to link to the Columbia County page. What is the problem here? |
|||
[[User:Watkec|Watkec]] ([[User talk:Watkec|talk]]) 14:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
:: That is interesting. So, I realize the following page has data in a table, but I count 14 links to the Baldwin County page alone: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_and_towns_in_Alabama And this is multiplied many times over on other pages throughout Wikipedia. Soooo, either the "Manual of Style" has been superseded by actual practice, OR you have a lot of work to do to undo all of those links on all of those pages. So which is it? And why does the "Manual of Style" apply to https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_historical_German_and_Czech_names_for_places_in_the_Czech_Republic&oldid=prev&diff=774900086 when it clearly doesn't apply elsewhere. Shall I compile a list of pages on Wikipedia that do not follow the "Manual of Style"? |
|||
::[[User:Watkec|Watkec]] ([[User talk:Watkec|talk]]) 01:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:::Here are a few more examples: |
|||
:::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_and_towns_in_California |
|||
:::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_and_towns_in_Colorado |
|||
:::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_Connecticut |
|||
:::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_towns_in_Connecticut |
|||
:::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_Alaska |
|||
:::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_and_towns_in_Arizona |
|||
:::Need more? [[User:Watkec|Watkec]] ([[User talk:Watkec|talk]]) 01:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == |
|||
*[[MOS:DUPLINK]]" Generally, a link should appear only once in an article"--[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie#top|talk]]) 11:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
| ⚫ | The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
||
| ⚫ | If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> |
||
== Slavs == |
|||
</div> |
|||
I have no problem with the revision you have restored and I appreciate the summary. I was just concerned about the conduct I saw happening in the history since the editor you ultimately reverted made numerous contributions and succumbed to arbitrary rollback on two occasions when it is clear that this person edited in good faith (i.e. meant well, and didn't vandalise, even if he did not meet policy requirements). This is why I left this message[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David_Biddulph&diff=prev&oldid=775937896]. So you know, I have no ambition to engage in further dispute on the article itself. Thanks again for the summary. --[[User:Oranges Juicy|OJ]] ([[User talk:Oranges Juicy|talk]]) 23:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC) |
|||
</div> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Latest revision as of 00:24, 28 November 2023
Teutonic Order
[edit]Hi Yopie! Glad you have interest in medieval orders! Please do not revert to old article. I am busy updating with newer more up to date information, with all the latest information. Kind Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shingetsutan (talk • contribs) 07:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
French Legitimist Page
[edit]Yopie, I see you're a monarchist. I'm surprised that you would continue to support a chart organization that clearly supports the Orleanist succession while having the audacity to accuse me of POV pushing.
The House of Bourbon is the senior branch, thus they would logically be seated above the House of Orleans. If the intent was to POV push, I would have divided it by "Bourbons/Orleans". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:980:C100:14:29C8:C346:4202:29B (talk) 22:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Yopie
[edit]Hi, I am Guilatshalit, and I wanna say Thank you Yopie for your comments, I hope to improve my articles and keep on editing wikipedia, thanks for your advice , now I will preview my articles before I edit , thank you so much.
czech prime ministers
[edit]I have another source that podivinsky is member of kdu-csl http://kducsl.cz/getmedia/966f7a80-58e6-4095-a70a-cc889e1435a0/KDU-CSL---KL-PSP2013-MSL.pdf.aspx note that candidate number 8 is clearly marked as independent.
RfC on which flag to use for Austria-Hungary's infobox
[edit]You are being invited to discuss the question of which flag to use for Austria-Hungary's infobox because you've previously participated in discussions on this topic. The discussion can be found at Talk:Austria-Hungary#RfC: National flags vs Civil Ensign White Shadows Let’s Talk 18:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Conversation on recent edits
[edit]Hello. I believe we need to have a detailed discussion about various edits that we have been making; this would be proper. Let us use this as one single point to communicate as this has turned into an octopus of edits!
Are we able to do this to reach a consensus? Chios historian (talk) 14:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, les talk at Damalastalk page, because there are other wikipedists involved. Yopie (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. I reached out to you here because you have been active everyday but have not responded to me uploading the requested sources; that is why I reverted your banner. I simply thought you saw them, it looked good, and you carried on making edits elsewhere. It was done in good faith, I can assure you.
- I will resume waiting for your response on the aforementioned talk page. Cheers. Chios historian (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
A government in exile page
[edit]Hello dear sir , I am parwiz ahmadi. I seen your edits in Government in exile page. I submitted an article Draft:United states of khorasan. unfortunately other admins do not know much more about a government in exile. this is about several time that several admins declined my submission and asked me that whats a government in exile? I hope you review this article , If it seems to be approved. please approve it
thank you so much for your cooperation Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, your draft is interesting, but I’m not sure that this insurgence group is government in exile. Yopie (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)