User talk:Yopie: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 00:24, 28 November 2023

Teutonic Order

Hi Yopie! Glad you have interest in medieval orders! Please do not revert to old article. I am busy updating with newer more up to date information, with all the latest information. Kind Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shingetsutan (talk • contribs) 07:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

French Legitimist Page

Yopie, I see you're a monarchist. I'm surprised that you would continue to support a chart organization that clearly supports the Orleanist succession while having the audacity to accuse me of POV pushing.

The House of Bourbon is the senior branch, thus they would logically be seated above the House of Orleans. If the intent was to POV push, I would have divided it by "Bourbons/Orleans". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:980:C100:14:29C8:C346:4202:29B (talk) 22:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Yopie

Hi, I am Guilatshalit, and I wanna say Thank you Yopie for your comments, I hope to improve my articles and keep on editing wikipedia, thanks for your advice , now I will preview my articles before I edit , thank you so much.

czech prime ministers

I have another source that podivinsky is member of kdu-csl http://kducsl.cz/getmedia/966f7a80-58e6-4095-a70a-cc889e1435a0/KDU-CSL---KL-PSP2013-MSL.pdf.aspx note that candidate number 8 is clearly marked as independent.

RfC on which flag to use for Austria-Hungary's infobox

You are being invited to discuss the question of which flag to use for Austria-Hungary's infobox because you've previously participated in discussions on this topic. The discussion can be found at Talk:Austria-Hungary#RfC: National flags vs Civil Ensign White Shadows ^{Let’s Talk} 18:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conversation on recent edits

Hello. I believe we need to have a detailed discussion about various edits that we have been making; this would be proper. Let us use this as one single point to communicate as this has turned into an octopus of edits!

Are we able to do this to reach a consensus? Chios historian (talk) 14:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, les talk at Damalastalk page, because there are other wikipedists involved. Yopie (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I reached out to you here because you have been active everyday but have not responded to me uploading the requested sources; that is why I reverted your banner. I simply thought you saw them, it looked good, and you carried on making edits elsewhere. It was done in good faith, I can assure you.

I will resume waiting for your response on the aforementioned talk page. Cheers. Chios historian (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A government in exile page

Hello dear sir , I am parwiz ahmadi. I seen your edits in Government in exile page. I submitted an article Draft:United states of khorasan. unfortunately other admins do not know much more about a government in exile. this is about several time that several admins declined my submission and asked me that whats a government in exile? I hope you review this article , If it seems to be approved. please approve it

thank you so much for your cooperation Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your draft is interesting, but I’m not sure that this insurgence group is government in exile. Yopie (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 }}
 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yopie/Archives | Archive page]
+===Teutonic Order===
+Hi Yopie! Glad you have interest in medieval orders! Please do not revert to old article. I am busy updating with newer more up to date information, with all the latest information. Kind Regards  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shingetsutan|Shingetsutan]] ([[User talk:Shingetsutan#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shingetsutan|contribs]]) 07:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+===French Legitimist Page===
+Yopie, I see you're a monarchist. I'm surprised that you would continue to support a chart organization that clearly supports the Orleanist succession while having the audacity to accuse me of POV pushing.
+The House of Bourbon is the senior branch, thus they would logically be seated above the House of Orleans. If the intent was to POV push, I would have divided it by "Bourbons/Orleans".  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:980:C100:14:29C8:C346:4202:29B|2601:980:C100:14:29C8:C346:4202:29B]] ([[User talk:2601:980:C100:14:29C8:C346:4202:29B#top|talk]]) 22:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 == Thanks Yopie ==
@@ Line 16: / Line 26: @@
+== RfC on which flag to use for Austria-Hungary's infobox ==
-== revert ==
+You are being invited to discuss the question of which flag to use for Austria-Hungary's infobox because you've previously participated in discussions on this topic. The discussion can be found at [[Talk:Austria-Hungary#RfC: National flags vs Civil Ensign]] [[user:White Shadows|<b style="color:#003153">White Shadows</b>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<b style="color:#DC143C">Let’s Talk</b>]]</sup> 18:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
+== Conversation on recent edits ==
-Why did you revert my entry on the list of foreign award winners of the Ordre des palm academique??
-I have been awarded this year and I have proof!
-Natacha
+Hello. I believe we need to have a detailed discussion about various edits that we have been making; this would be proper. Let us use this as one single point to communicate as this has turned into an octopus of edits!
-== Accepted edit on [[Czech Republic]] ==
+Are we able to do this to reach a consensus? [[User:Chios historian|Chios historian]] ([[User talk:Chios historian|talk]]) 14:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
-Could you clarify why you accepted [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Czech_Republic&diff=780379327&oldid=780025268 this edit]? Seems like all it did was remove cited content with no explanation. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 19:56, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
+:Hello, les talk at [[Damalas]]talk page, because there are other wikipedists involved. [[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie#top|talk]]) 15:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
-== Candia/Levieux hoax ==
+::Ok. I reached out to you here because you have been active everyday but have not responded to me uploading the requested sources; that is why I reverted your banner. I simply thought you  saw them, it looked good, and you carried on making edits elsewhere. It was done in good faith, I can assure you.
+::I will resume waiting for your response on the aforementioned talk page. Cheers. [[User:Chios historian|Chios historian]] ([[User talk:Chios historian|talk]]) 16:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
+== A government in exile page ==
-Hi. Thank you for [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cecilia_Maria_de_Candia&diff=prev&oldid=781996710 this]. However I don't think it is Smithson, it is the highly nefarious "Candia/Levieux" vandal ("vandal" in the smithsonian way), whose last incarnation was [[user:Edy2017]], and who has surprinsingly never been blocked as far as I know...--[[User:Phso2|Phso2]] ([[User talk:Phso2|talk]]) 20:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
-:Hello [[User:Phso2|Phso2]] Thank you for info about new "inventor" of noble lineage. --[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie#top|talk]]) 21:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
-::Some excerpts from my collection : [https://it.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Giovanni_di_Brienne&diff=10359607&oldid=10204347], [https://fr.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Anselme_de_Cantorb%C3%A9ry&diff=next&oldid=97819509], [https://it.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=John_Lyon,_lord_di_Glamis&diff=83702499&oldid=81712974], [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Lucas_Cranach_the_Elder&diff=prev&oldid=758455831], [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Simonetta_Vespucci&diff=next&oldid=573068629], [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Henry,_Count_of_Malta&diff=159087372&oldid=117490189]...--[[User:Phso2|Phso2]] ([[User talk:Phso2|talk]]) 22:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
+Hello dear sir , I am parwiz ahmadi. I seen your edits in [[Government in exile]] page. I submitted an article [[Draft:United states of khorasan]]. unfortunately other admins do not know much more about a government in exile. this is about several time that several admins declined my submission and asked me that whats a government in exile? I hope you review this article , If it seems to be approved. please approve it
-== Knights Templar template Image  ==
+thank you so much for your cooperation  [[User:Parwiz ahmadi|Parwiz ahmadi]] ([[User talk:Parwiz ahmadi|talk]]) 18:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
-Hello Yopie,
+:Hello, your draft is interesting, but I’m not sure that this insurgence group is  government in exile. [[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie#top|talk]]) 18:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
-I wish to notify you of a person that continuously modifies the [[Template:Knights Templar]] imagery without any justifiable reason. There has even been attempts by another to edit the imagery and i see no reason as to change the original image of the Templar Cross, especially when these two individuals can not have any consensus. Interaction with any disapproving users is not in my expertise, could you please address this? it would be most appreciated. Thank You.
+== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
+<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
-[[User:Vale da Avalon|Vale da Avalon]] ([[User talk:Vale da Avalon|talk]]) 08:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
+<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
-:AFAIK "neo-templars" with their  agenda.--[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie#top|talk]]) 01:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
+<div class="ivmbox-text">
+Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
+The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
-"When History meets delusion."
-[[User:Vale da Avalon|Vale da Avalon]] ([[User talk:Vale da Avalon|talk]]) 08:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
+If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
-== Paraduin ==
+</div>
-Hi, you removed [[Paraduin]] from several lists. I have readded it, because you gave an invalid reason for your actions. Items in lists do not need to be individually notable, see [[WP:LISTN]]. Even if the article itself were to be deleted, Paraduin is still mentioned in various other lemmata, and there would be no reason to treat it differently from e.g. North Sudan. Readers will want to find its context. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User talk:Guido den Broeder|talk]]) 01:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
+</div>
+<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 -->