Jump to content

Port Victoria P.V.9: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- This article is a part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]] for recommended layout. -->
<!-- This article is a part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]] for recommended layout. -->
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2017}}
{|{{Infobox Aircraft Begin
{{Use British English|date=June 2017}}
{|{{Infobox aircraft begin
| name=P.V.9
| name=P.V.9
| image=
| image=
| caption=
| caption=
}}{{Infobox Aircraft Type
}}{{Infobox aircraft type
| type=Floatplane fighter
| type=Floatplane fighter
| national origin=[[United Kingdom]]
| national origin=[[United Kingdom]]
Line 23: Line 25:
}}
}}
|}
|}
The '''Port Victoria P.V.9''' was a [[United Kingdom|British]] single-seat [[biplane]] [[floatplane]] fighter of the [[First World War]]. Although claimed to be the best aircraft of its type yet to be tested, only a single prototype was built.
The '''Port Victoria P.V.9''' was a British single-seat [[biplane]] [[floatplane]] fighter of the [[First World War]]. Although claimed to be the best aircraft of its type yet to be tested, only a single prototype was built.


==Design and development==
==Design and development==


In mid-1917, the [[Port Victoria Marine Experimental Aircraft Depot|RNAS Marine Experimental Aircraft Depot]] at Port Victoria on the [[Isle of Grain]] was instructed to build a new single-seat floatplane fighter as a possible replacement for the [[Royal Naval Air Service]] (RNAS)'s [[Sopwith Baby]]s. The new aircraft was to combine the good manoeuvrability and pilot view of Port Victoria's earlier [[Port Victoria P.V.2|P.V.2]] floatplane with superior speed.<ref name="Collyer p53">Collyer 1991, p. 53.</ref><ref name="Mason fighter p122">Mason 1992, p. 122.</ref>
In mid-1917, the [[Port Victoria Marine Experimental Aircraft Depot|RNAS Marine Experimental Aircraft Depot]] at Port Victoria on the [[Isle of Grain]] was instructed to build a new single-seat floatplane fighter as a possible replacement for the [[Royal Naval Air Service]] (RNAS)'s [[Sopwith Baby|Sopwith Babies]]. The new aircraft was to combine the good manoeuvrability and pilot view of [[Port Victoria, South Australia|Port Victoria]]'s earlier [[Port Victoria P.V.2|P.V.2]] floatplane with superior speed.<ref name="Collyer p53">Collyer 1991, p. 53.</ref><ref name="Mason fighter p122">Mason 1992, p. 122.</ref>


Like the P.V.2, the new design, the Port Victoria P.V.9 was a single-engined sesquiplane (i.e. a [[biplane]] with its lower wing much smaller than its upper wing) braced with faired steel tubes. The fuselage, wider than that of the P.V.2, was mounted between the upper and lower wings, almost filling the inter-wing gap, giving an excellent view for the pilot. Armament was a [[Vickers machine gun]] [[synchronization gear|synchronised]] to fire through the propeller disc, with a [[Lewis gun]] mounted above the upper wing firing over the propeller. Power was provided by a [[Bentley BR1]] [[rotary engine]]. While the designers had hoped to use the same high-lift [[aerofoil]] section as used in the P.V.2, this was rejected by the [[Admiralty]], who demanded the use of the more conventional RAF 15 aerofoil, which resulted in a larger aircraft with a reduced climb rate and ceiling.<ref name="Mason fighter p122"/><ref name="Collyer p53-4">Collyer 1991, pp. 53–54.</ref>
Like the P.V.2, the new design, the Port Victoria P.V.9 was a single-engined sesquiplane (i.e. a [[biplane]] with its lower wing much smaller than its upper wing) braced with faired steel tubes. The fuselage, wider than that of the P.V.2, was mounted between the upper and lower wings, almost filling the inter-wing gap, giving an excellent view for the pilot. Armament was a [[Vickers machine gun]] [[synchronization gear|synchronised]] to fire through the propeller disc, with a [[Lewis gun]] mounted above the upper wing firing over the propeller. Power was provided by a [[Bentley BR1]] [[rotary engine]]. While the designers had hoped to use the same high-lift [[aerofoil]] section as used in the P.V.2, this was rejected by the [[British Admiralty|Admiralty]], who demanded the use of the more conventional RAF 15 aerofoil, which resulted in a larger aircraft with a reduced climb rate and ceiling.<ref name="Mason fighter p122"/><ref name="Collyer p53-4">Collyer 1991, pp. 53–54.</ref>


==Operational history==
==Operational history==


The P.V.9 made its maiden flight in December 1917, but trials were delayed by engine troubles and by a collision of the aircraft with a barge, which resulted in a propeller not matched properly to the aircraft being fitted, further reducing performance. Despite this, when the P.V.9 was officially tested in May 1918, the P.V.9 was said to be the best seaplane fighter tested up to that time.<ref name="Collyer p53-4"/><ref name="Bruce British p341">Bruce 1957, p. 341.</ref> No production followed, however, as the availability of [[Sopwith Pup]] and [[Sopwith Camel|Camel]] landplanes which could operate from platforms aboard ships, removed the requirement for a floatplane fighter.<ref name="Mason fighter p122"/>
The P.V.9 made its maiden flight in December 1917, but trials were delayed by engine troubles and by a collision of the aircraft with a barge, which resulted in a propeller not being matched properly to the aircraft being fitted, further reducing performance. Despite this, when the P.V.9 was officially tested in May 1918, the P.V.9 was said to be the best seaplane fighter tested up to that time.<ref name="Collyer p53-4"/><ref name="Bruce British p341">Bruce 1957, p. 341.</ref> No production followed, however, as the availability of [[Sopwith Pup]] and [[Sopwith Camel|Camel]] landplanes which could operate from platforms aboard ships, removed the requirement for a floatplane fighter.<ref name="Mason fighter p122"/>


==Specifications==
==Specifications==
Line 153: Line 155:
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin}}
*Bruce, J.M. ''British Aeroplanes 1914–18''. London:Putnam, 1957.
*Bruce, J.M. ''British Aeroplanes 1914–18''. London:Putnam, 1957.
*Collyer, David. "Babies Kittens and Griffons". ''[[Air Enthusiast]]'', Number 43, 1991. Stamford, UK:Key Publishing. ISSN 0143 5450. pp.&nbsp;50–55.
*Collyer, David. "Babies Kittens and Griffons". ''[[Air Enthusiast]]'', Number 43, 1991. Stamford, UK:Key Publishing. {{ISSN|0143-5450}}. pp.&nbsp;50–55.
*Mason, Francis K. ''The British Fighter since 1912''. Annapolis, Maryland:Naval Institute Press, 1992. ISBN 1-55750-082-7.
*Mason, Francis K. ''The British Fighter since 1912''. Annapolis, Maryland:Naval Institute Press, 1992. {{ISBN|1-55750-082-7}}.
{{refend}}
{{refend}}
<!-- ==Further reading== -->
<!-- ==Further reading== -->
Line 166: Line 168:


[[Category:Floatplanes]]
[[Category:Floatplanes]]
[[Category:British fighter aircraft 1910–1919]]
[[Category:1910s British fighter aircraft]]
[[Category:Port Victoria aircraft|PV9]]
[[Category:Port Victoria aircraft|PV9]]
[[Category:Sesquiplanes]]
[[Category:Sesquiplanes]]
[[Category:Single-engine aircraft]]
[[Category:Single-engined tractor aircraft]]
[[Category:Rotary-engined aircraft]]
[[Category:Rotary-engined aircraft]]
[[Category:Aircraft first flown in 1917]]

Latest revision as of 06:05, 2 December 2023

P.V.9
Role Floatplane fighter
National origin United Kingdom
Manufacturer RNAS Marine Experimental Aircraft Depot
First flight December 1917
Number built 1

The Port Victoria P.V.9 was a British single-seat biplane floatplane fighter of the First World War. Although claimed to be the best aircraft of its type yet to be tested, only a single prototype was built.

Design and development

[edit]

In mid-1917, the RNAS Marine Experimental Aircraft Depot at Port Victoria on the Isle of Grain was instructed to build a new single-seat floatplane fighter as a possible replacement for the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS)'s Sopwith Babies. The new aircraft was to combine the good manoeuvrability and pilot view of Port Victoria's earlier P.V.2 floatplane with superior speed.[1][2]

Like the P.V.2, the new design, the Port Victoria P.V.9 was a single-engined sesquiplane (i.e. a biplane with its lower wing much smaller than its upper wing) braced with faired steel tubes. The fuselage, wider than that of the P.V.2, was mounted between the upper and lower wings, almost filling the inter-wing gap, giving an excellent view for the pilot. Armament was a Vickers machine gun synchronised to fire through the propeller disc, with a Lewis gun mounted above the upper wing firing over the propeller. Power was provided by a Bentley BR1 rotary engine. While the designers had hoped to use the same high-lift aerofoil section as used in the P.V.2, this was rejected by the Admiralty, who demanded the use of the more conventional RAF 15 aerofoil, which resulted in a larger aircraft with a reduced climb rate and ceiling.[2][3]

Operational history

[edit]

The P.V.9 made its maiden flight in December 1917, but trials were delayed by engine troubles and by a collision of the aircraft with a barge, which resulted in a propeller not being matched properly to the aircraft being fitted, further reducing performance. Despite this, when the P.V.9 was officially tested in May 1918, the P.V.9 was said to be the best seaplane fighter tested up to that time.[3][4] No production followed, however, as the availability of Sopwith Pup and Camel landplanes which could operate from platforms aboard ships, removed the requirement for a floatplane fighter.[2]

Specifications

[edit]

Data from British Aeroplanes 1914–18[4]

General characteristics

  • Crew: 1
  • Length: 25 ft 2 in (7.67 m)
  • Upper wingspan: 30 ft 11 in (9.42 m)
  • Lower wingspan: 20 ft 1 in (6.12 m)
  • Height: 9 ft 0 in (2.74 m)
  • Wing area: 227 sq ft (21.1 m2)
  • Airfoil: RAF 15
  • Empty weight: 1,404 lb (637 kg)
  • Gross weight: 1,965 lb (891 kg)
  • Fuel capacity: 34.5 Imp Gallons
  • Powerplant: 1 × Bentley BR1 9-cylinder air-cooled rotary engine, 150 hp (110 kW)

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 110.5 mph (177.8 km/h, 96.0 kn) at 2,000 ft (610 m)
  • Endurance: 2.5 hours
  • Service ceiling: 11,500 ft (3,500 m)
  • Time to altitude: 3 min 10 s to 2,000 ft (610 m), 27 min 20 s to 10,000 ft (3,050 m0

Armament

See also

[edit]

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Collyer 1991, p. 53.
  2. ^ a b c Mason 1992, p. 122.
  3. ^ a b Collyer 1991, pp. 53–54.
  4. ^ a b Bruce 1957, p. 341.

References

[edit]
  • Bruce, J.M. British Aeroplanes 1914–18. London:Putnam, 1957.
  • Collyer, David. "Babies Kittens and Griffons". Air Enthusiast, Number 43, 1991. Stamford, UK:Key Publishing. ISSN 0143-5450. pp. 50–55.
  • Mason, Francis K. The British Fighter since 1912. Annapolis, Maryland:Naval Institute Press, 1992. ISBN 1-55750-082-7.
[edit]