Jump to content

Meta-ethnicity: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
I have added a new example and I have corrected the name for a source.
m Disambiguating links to Meta (link changed to Meta (prefix)) using DisamAssist.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Large group of related ethnic groups who identify with each other}}
{{Short description|Large group of related ethnic groups who identify with each other}}
'''Meta-ethnicity''' is a relatively recent term (or [[neologism]]) occasionally used in academic literature or public discourse on [[ethnic studies]]. It describes a level of commonality that is wider ("[[meta-]]") and more general (i.e., might differ on specifics) than [[Ethnic group|ethnicity]], but does not necessarily correspond to (and may actually transcend) [[nation]] or [[nationality]]. In colloquial discourse, it usually signifies a larger group of related [[ethnic group]]s who identify with each other.
'''Meta-ethnicity''' is a relatively recent term (or [[neologism]]) occasionally used in academic literature or public discourse on [[ethnic studies]]. It describes a level of commonality that is wider ("[[Meta (prefix)|meta-]]") and more general (i.e., might differ on specifics) than [[Ethnic group|ethnicity]], but does not necessarily correspond to (and may actually transcend) [[nation]] or [[nationality]]. In colloquial discourse, it usually signifies a larger [[In-group and out-group|in-group]] of distinct [[ethnic group]]s who identify more closely with each other than they would with [[In-group and out-group|out-group]] ethnic groups. The groups within the in-group may be genetically and culturally related which reinforces the grouping.


An early use—possibly the first published in English—was an article in a 1984 [[USSR Academy of Sciences]] publication discussing identity in [[Asia]] and [[Africa]].<ref>Brook, Solomon, and Nikolai Cheboksarov. 1984. "Metaethnic Identities in Asia and Africa." In ''Ethnocultural Development of African Countries''. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences. Pp. 49-73.</ref>
An early use—possibly the first published in English—was an article in a 1984 [[USSR Academy of Sciences]] publication discussing identity in [[Asia]] and [[Africa]].<ref>Brook, Solomon, and Nikolai Cheboksarov. 1984. "Metaethnic Identities in Asia and Africa." In ''Ethnocultural Development of African Countries''. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences. Pp. 49-73.</ref>
Line 7: Line 7:
Some other examples:
Some other examples:


* Gurharpal Singh: Ethnic Conflict in India: A Case-Study of Punjab (New York: Palgrave, 2000).
* Gurharpal Singh, ''Ethnic Conflict in India: A Case-Study of Punjab'' (New York: Palgrave, 2000).
* Gurharpal Singh wrote: "Against this dominant view of the nature of the Indian state, Singh argues that [[India]] should be seen as an '[[ethnic democracy]]' in which [[Hinduism]] works as a meta-ethnicity and in which [[hegemonic]] control is exercised over ethnic [[Minority group|minorities]], particularly those living in the peripheral regions"<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.sikhtimes.com/books_093001a.html|title=The Sikh Times - Book Reviews - New Perspectives on Sikh Studies|last=Lamba|first=Puniit Singh|website=www.sikhtimes.com|access-date=2017-10-01}}</ref> or over other religions within the polity, such as [[Islam]].
* Gurharpal Singh, "Against this dominant view of the nature of the Indian state, Singh argues that [[India]] should be seen as an '[[ethnic democracy]]' in which [[Hinduism]] works as a meta-ethnicity and in which [[hegemonic]] control is exercised over ethnic [[Minority group|minorities]], particularly those living in the peripheral regions" in Christopher Shackle, Gurharpal Singh and Arvind-Pal Mandair eds., ''Sikh Religion, Culture and Ethnicity'' (Curson: 2001), p.155.
* "L. Byzov, however, believes that 'there has taken place within the [[Russia]]n national consciousness one of the most radical changes ever: from a meta-ethnic sense of [[Identity (social science)|identity]] to a strictly ethnic identity' (Byzov 1996, 45)."<ref>[http://www.molokane.org/molokan/Religion/Agadjanian_paper.htm Agadjanian, Alexander. 2001. "Religious pluralism and national identity in Russia." ''MOST Journal on Multicultural Societies'', Vol. 2, No. 2 (note 19)]</ref>
* "L. Byzov, however, believes that 'there has taken place within the [[Russia]]n national consciousness one of the most radical changes ever: from a meta-ethnic sense of [[Identity (social science)|identity]] to a strictly ethnic identity' (Byzov 1996, 45)."<ref>[http://www.molokane.org/molokan/Religion/Agadjanian_paper.htm Agadjanian, Alexander. 2001. "Religious pluralism and national identity in Russia." ''MOST Journal on Multicultural Societies'', Vol. 2, No. 2 (note 19)]</ref>
* "Geoffrey Fox, on the other hand, argues that '[[Hispanic]]', with its emphasis on [[Spanish language|Spanish-language]] [[Cultural heritage|heritage]] as the foundation of meta-ethnicity, has no implied [[Race (classification of human beings)|racial]] or [[Social class|class]] agendas and is simply preferred by most [[immigrants]] from [[Latin America]]." ... "Furthermore, these split-level processes of [[identity formation]]—the forging of ethnicity and meta-ethnicity—take place in regional contexts of unequal ethnic control over media and [[Symbolic system|symbol systems]]."<ref>[http://newleftreview.org/?view=1983 Davis, Mike. 1999. "Magical Urbanism: Latinos Reinvent the US Big City." ''New Left Review'' I/234, March-April 1999]</ref>
* "Geoffrey Fox, on the other hand, argues that '[[Hispanic]]', with its emphasis on [[Spanish language|Spanish-language]] [[Cultural heritage|heritage]] as the foundation of meta-ethnicity, has no implied [[Race (classification of human beings)|racial]] or [[Social class|class]] agendas and is simply preferred by most [[immigrants]] from [[Latin America]]." ... "Furthermore, these split-level processes of [[identity formation]]—the forging of ethnicity and meta-ethnicity—take place in regional contexts of unequal ethnic control over media and [[Symbolic system|symbol systems]]."<ref>[http://newleftreview.org/?view=1983 Davis, Mike. 1999. "Magical Urbanism: Latinos Reinvent the US Big City." ''New Left Review'' I/234, March-April 1999]</ref>

Latest revision as of 10:05, 3 December 2023

Meta-ethnicity is a relatively recent term (or neologism) occasionally used in academic literature or public discourse on ethnic studies. It describes a level of commonality that is wider ("meta-") and more general (i.e., might differ on specifics) than ethnicity, but does not necessarily correspond to (and may actually transcend) nation or nationality. In colloquial discourse, it usually signifies a larger in-group of distinct ethnic groups who identify more closely with each other than they would with out-group ethnic groups. The groups within the in-group may be genetically and culturally related which reinforces the grouping.

An early use—possibly the first published in English—was an article in a 1984 USSR Academy of Sciences publication discussing identity in Asia and Africa.[1]

Examples of use

[edit]

Some other examples:

  • Gurharpal Singh, Ethnic Conflict in India: A Case-Study of Punjab (New York: Palgrave, 2000).
  • Gurharpal Singh, "Against this dominant view of the nature of the Indian state, Singh argues that India should be seen as an 'ethnic democracy' in which Hinduism works as a meta-ethnicity and in which hegemonic control is exercised over ethnic minorities, particularly those living in the peripheral regions" in Christopher Shackle, Gurharpal Singh and Arvind-Pal Mandair eds., Sikh Religion, Culture and Ethnicity (Curson: 2001), p.155.
  • "L. Byzov, however, believes that 'there has taken place within the Russian national consciousness one of the most radical changes ever: from a meta-ethnic sense of identity to a strictly ethnic identity' (Byzov 1996, 45)."[2]
  • "Geoffrey Fox, on the other hand, argues that 'Hispanic', with its emphasis on Spanish-language heritage as the foundation of meta-ethnicity, has no implied racial or class agendas and is simply preferred by most immigrants from Latin America." ... "Furthermore, these split-level processes of identity formation—the forging of ethnicity and meta-ethnicity—take place in regional contexts of unequal ethnic control over media and symbol systems."[3]
  • Peter Turchin introduces the concept "metaethnic frontier theory" in his 2003 book, Historical Dynamics: Why States Rise and Fall[4]
  • According to Hussain, Imtiaz, "At the beginning of the new century, Chinese people are living the construction of a metaethnicity of multiple identities."[5]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Brook, Solomon, and Nikolai Cheboksarov. 1984. "Metaethnic Identities in Asia and Africa." In Ethnocultural Development of African Countries. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences. Pp. 49-73.
  2. ^ Agadjanian, Alexander. 2001. "Religious pluralism and national identity in Russia." MOST Journal on Multicultural Societies, Vol. 2, No. 2 (note 19)
  3. ^ Davis, Mike. 1999. "Magical Urbanism: Latinos Reinvent the US Big City." New Left Review I/234, March-April 1999
  4. ^ Turchin, Peter (2003). Historical Dynamics: Why States Rise and Fall. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691116693.
  5. ^ Hussain, Imtiaz (2004). Tyranny of Soft Touches: Interculturalism, Multiculturalism, and 21st Century International Relations. Universidad Iberoamericana. ISBN 9789688595381.
[edit]