Talk:Uranium(III) hydride: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
Assessment: Chemicals, +banner shell (C) (Rater) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=C |1= |
|||
{{chemicals}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Chemicals|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{dyktalk|16 February|2010|... that '''[[uranium hydride]]''' was investigated as a promising [[Uranium hydride bomb|bomb material]] in 1943 during the early phases of the [[Manhattan Project]]?}} |
{{dyktalk|16 February|2010|... that '''[[uranium hydride]]''' was investigated as a promising [[Uranium hydride bomb|bomb material]] in 1943 during the early phases of the [[Manhattan Project]]?}} |
||
== Atomic bombs with moderators == |
|||
If a moderator is required for U235 chain reaction in a bomb, then why do other (actually working) fission weapons NOT contain a moderator? [[User:TaylorLeem|TaylorLeem]] ([[User talk:TaylorLeem|talk]]) 23:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 30 December 2023
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | A fact from Uranium(III) hydride appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 February 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Atomic bombs with moderators
[edit]If a moderator is required for U235 chain reaction in a bomb, then why do other (actually working) fission weapons NOT contain a moderator? TaylorLeem (talk) 23:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)