Talk:Lynn Margulis: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Lynn Margulis/Archive 1) (bot |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 7 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 7 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biology}}, {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Chicago}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}}, {{WikiProject Women scientists}}, {{WikiProject Women writers}}. |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{COI editnotice}} |
{{COI editnotice}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Margulis, Lynn|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Biology |
{{WikiProject Biology|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject Biography |
{{WikiProject Biography|s&a-work-group=yes|s&a-priority=low}} |
||
⚫ | |||
|living=no |
|||
⚫ | |||
|class=C |
|||
⚫ | |||
|s&a-work-group=yes |
|||
⚫ | |||
|s&a-priority=low |
|||
{{WikiProject Women writers |importance=Low}} |
|||
|listas=Margulis, Lynn |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
{{connected contributor|James D. MacAllister|Lynn Margulis|declared=yes|editedhere=yes|otherlinks=COI disclosed [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:James_D._MacAllister&oldid=670355362 here] }} |
{{connected contributor|James D. MacAllister|Lynn Margulis|declared=yes|editedhere=yes|otherlinks=COI disclosed [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:James_D._MacAllister&oldid=670355362 here] }} |
||
Line 19: | Line 14: | ||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
||
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
||
|counter = |
|counter = 2 |
||
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
||
Line 26: | Line 21: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
== Request edit on |
== Request edit on 28 March 2018 == |
||
<!-- PLEASE READ: Please provide your requested edit after the {{ |
<!-- PLEASE READ: Please provide your requested edit after the {{edit COI}} below in a roughly "replace X with Y" format. Explain the rationale behind the edit and provide reliable sources to support the proposed changes. At the end of the request, add four tildes "~~~~" and click "Save Page" --> |
||
{{ |
{{edit COI|D|D}} |
||
#Delete "...with Jerry Coyne notably writing on his Why Evolution is True blog about Margulis' supposed "notion that AIDS is really syphilis, not viral in origin at all." rationale: Jerry Coyne's blog posts are not a reputable source. He often attacked Lynn Margulis for her opposition to neo-Darwinism. His claims that neo-Darwinism explain evolution and speciation have been demonstrated to be scientifically inaccurate. |
|||
In the introduction to Lynn Margullis the following: |
|||
#Delete "Seth Kalichman, a social psychologist who studies behavioral and social aspects of AIDS, cited her 2009 paper as an example of AIDS denialism "flourishing",[48] and asserted that her "endorsement of HIV/AIDS denialism defies understanding."[49] rationale: The statement "The paper did not question the existence of HIV or AIDS, nor that HIV causes AIDS, but suggested that syphilis could have been a co-factor in the spread of AIDS." which precedes the mention of Seth Kalichman is true and therefore the claim of Seth Kalichman cannot be true and should be deleted. Everyone has a right to their opinion, but not their own set of facts." - Patrick Moynihan |
|||
"Lynn Margulis (born Lynn Petra Alexander;[1][2] March 5, 1938 – November 22, 2011)[3] was an '''''evolutionary biologist''''' who was the primary modern proponent for the significance of symbiosis in biological evolution: historian Jan Sapp noted that, "Lynn Margulis’s name is as synonymous with symbiosis as Charles Darwin’s is with evolution."[4]" |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/2601:180:8200:C540:156F:42D7:A1F:B175|2601:180:8200:C540:156F:42D7:A1F:B175]] ([[User talk:2601:180:8200:C540:156F:42D7:A1F:B175|talk]]) 18:14, 29 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
should be replaced with: |
|||
"Lynn Margulis (born Lynn Petra Alexander;[1][2] March 5, 1938 – November 22, 2011)[3] was an '''''evolutionist''''' who was the primary modern proponent for the significance of symbiosis in biological evolution: historian Jan Sapp noted that, "Lynn Margulis’s name is as synonymous with symbiosis as Charles Darwin’s is with evolution."[4] |
|||
Rationale: Margulis never considered herself an ''evolutionary biologist'' because that field, evolutionary biology, was neo-Darwinist, She referred to herself as an "'''evolutionist'''" and her degrees were in zoology and genetics. Now that the Modern Synthesis and the Dawkins idea of "the selfish gene" have been demonstrated to be incomplete or wrong in all assumptions and rules,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Noble|first1=Denis|title=Evolution and physiology: a new synthesis|url=http://www.voicesfromoxford.org/video/evolution-and-physiology-a-new-synthesis/355|website=Voices from Oxford|publisher=Voices from Oxford|accessdate=24 July 2015}}</ref> it seems inappropriate to call her something she disagreed with for almost her entire 50-year career. |
|||
{{reflist-talk}} |
|||
[[User:James D. MacAllister|James D. MacAllister]] ([[User talk:James D. MacAllister|talk]]) 19:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
===Reply 30-MAR-2018=== |
|||
:Another idea: The very first citation of the article is the NY Times obit, which called her an evolutionary theorist, and that could be used, but how about not searching for the ONE word that depicts Margulis, but rather listing all of her areas of expertise? This is in fact done with a great many Wiki entries, including many other important biologists, and given that she was so broad based and had such wide and diverse expertise, I should think that this would be highly appropriate. |
|||
I've read the paragraph and reproduced it below for this discussion. In the reproduction I note how each assertion is worded, and discuss whether any of the assertions are "out of place". Please note that this quoted text may have changed in the interim. It reflects only how the article looked as of 06:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC). |
|||
<br> |
|||
{{quote box|width=50%|align=center|1=In 2009 Margulis and seven others authored a position paper concerning research on the viability of round body forms of some spirochetes, "Syphilis, Lyme disease & AIDS: Resurgence of 'the great imitator'?", which states that, "Detailed research that correlates life histories of symbiotic spirochetes to changes in the immune system of associated vertebrates is sorely needed," and urging the "reinvestigation of the natural history of mammalian, tick-borne, and venereal transmission of spirochetes in relation to impairment of the human immune system."{{NoteTag|This is the assertion made by this particular paper being mentioned at this point in the passage: That the life history of symbiotic spirochetes needs to be examined with regards to how they affect the immune system of other organisms.}} The paper did not question the existence of HIV or AIDS, nor that HIV causes AIDS, but suggested that syphilis could have been a co-factor in the spread of AIDS. In a Discover Magazine interview with Dick Teresi published less than six months before her death, however, Margulis spoke provocatively of how, "the set of symptoms, or syndrome, presented by syphilitics overlaps completely with another syndrome: AIDS,"{{NoteTag|Here Margulis is making assertions ''outside'' of the paper, in a magazine interview. The passage clearly states that.}} and also noted that Kary Mullis, a winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize for the polymerase chain reaction, with unconventional scientific views, said that "he went looking for a reference substantiating that HIV causes AIDS and discovered, 'There is no such document.' "{{NoteTag|This is Margulis' assertion of what she believes to be ''another'' assertion made by Kary Mullis. According to Margulis, Mullis was unable to locate the document. Whether or not Mullis found the document or was even looking for it is made clear in this passage. }} This elicited widespread suggestions that Margulis was an "AIDS denialist", with Jerry Coyne notably writing on his Why Evolution is True blog about Margulis' supposed "notion that AIDS is really syphilis, not viral in origin at all."{{NoteTag|This is Coyne's assertion, and the text in the passage makes that clear.}} Seth Kalichman, a social psychologist who studies behavioral and social aspects of AIDS, cited her 2009 paper{{NoteTag|".....cited '''''her''''' 2009 paper": This could be made more clear who '''''her''''' is referring to. I believe it to be Margulis.}} as an example of AIDS denialism "flourishing", and asserted that her "endorsement{{NoteTag|Another instance of '''''her''''' similar to the first. I believe this is also referring to Margulis. This should be made more clear by using the person's name instead of confusing pronouns.}} of HIV/AIDS denialism defies understanding." <span style="border:3px red; border-style:none none solid;">In the Discover Magazine interview, Margulis discussed with Teresi the primary grounds for her</span>{{NoteTag|This use of '''''her''''' is additionally confusing because we're discussing two women: Margulis and Teresi. Which of them this '''''her''''' refers to is unknown.}} <span style="border:3px red; border-style:none none solid;">initial interest in the material of the 2009 "AIDS" paper, being that "I’m interested in spirochetes only because of our ancestry. I’m not interested in the diseases," and stated that to her the fact that both Treponema (the spirochete which causes syphilis) and Borrelia (the spirochete which causes Lyme disease) only have retained about 20% of the genes they need to live freely outside of their human hosts, they should be considered as symbionts.</span>{{NoteTag|This last section highlighted in red is the most confused and problematic in the entire passage, and it's clear that it was added by a different editor than the ones responsible for the other passages. This sentence needs to be rewritten to remove the pronouns and clarify what it is that is being communicated, and by whom.}}<br> |
|||
___________<br> |
|||
{{NoteFoot}} |
|||
:It's true that I called her an evolutionary biologist, but before it was American biologist, and given the importance of evolutionary process to what she did for biology, I just changed it to that reflexively - I actually don't think it's bad to take the word back from the neo-Darwinists, but there's also nothing special about the name either. We can forego it..... |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{clear}} |
|||
:So, what about - |
|||
The problem areas of the text I've highlighted in red are discussed in the notes. The entire last section is the most problematic. I leave this hear to spark discussion on how it should be handled. The editor who made the COI edit request is asked to help form a consensus for change before reactivating the request. Regards, <small>'''<span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Spintendo|<span style="background:#fdd;color:white"><span style="background:#f88"><span style="background:#f00"><span style="background:#700"><span style="background:#008">Spintendo </span> </span> </span> </span> </span>]]</span>'''</small> 06:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Lynn Margulis was an American evolutionary theorist, biologist, microbiologist, taxonomist, bacteriologist and protistologist with degrees in zoology and genetics, and is above all known as.....[[User:Terradactyl|Terradactyl]] ([[User talk:Terradactyl|talk]]) 23:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::(I hope neither of you mind, but I refactored a little above.) Probably pick EITHER "microbiologist" OR "bacteriologist and protistologist" (redundant to include both), and drop "biologist" as it's redundant to everything else. [[User:Adrian J. Hunter|Adrian '''J.''' Hunter]]<sup>([[User talk:Adrian J. Hunter|talk]]•[[Special:contributions/Adrian J. Hunter|contribs]])</sup> 00:22, 25 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::Just a note to say that Lynn Margulis was not a microbiologist, that was not her field. Microbiologists deal with macromolecules and extrapolate from things like DNA sequencing. Although the name might lead you to believe they look through microscopes, they don't (although I am sure there are a few who do). They avoid "whole organism" biology as antiquated (of course this is nuts). So let's not put in that Lynn Margulis, who loved nothing better than an uninterrupted weekend or holiday looking through the light microscope at live organisms, a microbiologist. That is as bad as evolutionary biologist! Both fields were as far from what Lynn did as "biology" gets and she provocatively said both had "taken the life out of biology". I think her work as an educator is also exemplary and needs to be featured in that description along with the other disciplines she had mastered. |
|||
:::Otherwise I think the introduction--thanks everyone--is a vast improvement over what was there maybe a month ago. I also appreciate that Adrian Hunter has made the changes to the HIV/AIDS theory section. Lynn Margulis certainly said the things she said in the Discover article, but she liked to be provocative (give folks an intellectual dope slap when she thought it was needed--she was above all a teacher). In context, nothing that she said was inaccurate but any questioning of a sacred cow like the HIV hypothesis is labeled as "AIDS denialism". I do appreciate Terradactyl's suggestion that some things such as this be moved to a "controversies" section. These are after all, a few sentences from a 50-year career. There is also another "controversial" subject that Lynn Margulis and her lab did extensive work on and that is '''chromidia'''. These are a form of propagule that got tossed out of science because they did not occur in animals, plants and fungi, but Margulis and her lab would maintain that this is one of many ways that protoctists deal with dramatic changes (such as desiccation) in their environments. I could write something up about this with references and make an edit request. This is a subject that may have few if any secondary sources, but it is postulated and not stated as a fact, so I would hope that her papers would be permissible as references to her work in this area. It may also have been the subject of some of her graduate students' and PhD students' theses and dissertations.[[User:James D. MacAllister|James D. MacAllister]] ([[User talk:James D. MacAllister|talk]]) 13:50, 25 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks all. Since there were no negative comments, and several positive ones, on the "controversies" section concept, I just restored, again moving the Five Kingdoms back into contributions. Since the 9/11 material got removed by Viriditas, there are now only 2 controversies - perhaps what James suggests could be added..... |
|||
Another idea: could one potentially take the spirochete symbiont aspect of SET theory and treat it here, as a continuing 'controversy', rather than adding better material about it within the endosymbiotic theory section? |
|||
I don't have really strong feelings about the opening list of fields, so if anyone else wants to do some triage on that, I'm fine with whatever you all come up with.....but I like, and prefer, the idea of not trying to have just one word to define her.....and I don't think that, just because she didn't like "evolutionary biologists" that including that word among her activities is a bad thing, although I did remove it......I agree with Adrian, that real redundancy should be avoided, although some overlap is inevitable, because of the interrelated nature of the vaarious fields of expertise.....[[User:Terradactyl|Terradactyl]] ([[User talk:Terradactyl|talk]]) 18:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::I removed "microbiologist" from the list of things Lynn Margulis was because she wasn't a microbiologist. I would include a reference but it is hard to reference the negative. I would suggest moving "educator" to the front of the list.[[Special:Contributions/71.234.176.148|71.234.176.148]] ([[User talk:71.234.176.148|talk]]) 18:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{request edit/answered}} |
|||
I would like to request that the last line of the opening paragraph of the Lynn Margulis page, "Margulis was also the co-developer of Gaia theory with the British chemist James Lovelock, proposing that the Earth functions as a single self-regulating system, and was the principal defender of the five kingdom classification of Robert Whittaker." I request that we add that she "was the principal defender and promulgater of the five kingdom classification of Robert Whittaker." My rationale is that Margulis edited and published four editions of "Five Kingdoms: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth" (the fourth edition was retitled "Kingdoms and Domains: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth". [[User:James D. MacAllister|James D. MacAllister]] ([[User talk:James D. MacAllister|talk]]) 20:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:Sounds reasonable to me. I've added "and promulgater" per your request. Thanks, [[User:Adrian J. Hunter|Adrian '''J.''' Hunter]]<sup>([[User talk:Adrian J. Hunter|talk]]•[[Special:contributions/Adrian J. Hunter|contribs]])</sup> 11:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
I just realised the original edit request from 23 July was still open. I've closed it, as I ''think'' the original concern has been addressed. But just to confirm: {{ping|James D. MacAllister}}, are you ok with "evolutionary theorist"? I actually prefer this term over "evolutionist", as just about any time I've heard the latter, it's been used as a disparaging term by a creationist (and I see I'm [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Evolutionist not the first] to notice this). |
|||
I've removed "biologist" and "microscopist" from the first sentence, as both seem redundant to "bacteriologist" and "protistologist". I haven't moved "educator" to the front as Margulis' obituaries in ''Washington Post'', ''New York Times'' and ''The Guardian'' all emphasise her work as a scientist much more than her work as an educator. |
|||
It sounds like a section on chromidia would be a valuable addition, especially as these are [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?search=chromidia&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go barely mentioned] in Wikipedia. So long as such a section were short enough not to give undue weight, and did not overstate the acceptance of chromidia by other scientists, I think this would be a legitimate use of primary sources. [[User:Adrian J. Hunter|Adrian '''J.''' Hunter]]<sup>([[User talk:Adrian J. Hunter|talk]]•[[Special:contributions/Adrian J. Hunter|contribs]])</sup> 11:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified 2 external links on [[Lynn Margulis]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/819514973|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330012531/http://www.worldacademy.org/content/lynn-margulis to http://www.worldacademy.org/content/lynn-margulis |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120405154012/http://www.geo.umass.edu/margulis_symposium.html to http://www.geo.umass.edu/margulis_symposium.html |
|||
===Reply 04-APR-2018=== |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
I must disagree with the idea that the text outlined in red is the most problematic. Perhaps the biggest problem with the discussion of Lynn Margulis's ideas about various spirochetoses (infections with spirochetes) is that this section should not be called "AIDS/HIV theory". A better title would be "Viability of Spirochete 'round bodies'". This is the subject of the 2009 paper which I was a co-author and an editor. There was then and there still is a controversy, but the controversy is not about HIV/AIDS theory. Instead the controversy is threefold: first, is wheher or not round bodies (a pleomorphic shape that spirochetes may take or in which some spirochetes spend all of their life history in) are viable (alive); second, that antibiotics are guaranteed to cure infections by spirochetes (syphilis and Lyme disease); and third, that the standard tests used for screening for spirochetoses are reliable. Much of mainstream biology and medicine still assume that round bodies are not viable (dead), that antibiotics cure spirochetoses, and that standard screening tests for spirochetoses are reliable. There is abundant evidence (which I can provide if requested) that these assumptions are examples of what Whitehead called the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. That is that they are commonly believed but are in fact not supported by scientific study. Since neither Jerry Coyne nor Seth Kalichman has any expertise on the question of whether or not spirochete round bodies are viable, the question of the effectiveness of antibiotics in treating spirochetoses, and the reliabilty of the standard screening tests in use, I see no reason to include their opinions which are wildly off-the-mark and seem to have been included by someone with a desire to disparage Lynn Margulis with the ad hominem label of "AIDS denialist". As the title of our 2009 paper makes clear, she did not deny the existence of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. What she questioned was whether or not HIV alone was the exclusive causitive agent. Margulis's thinking that AIDS may have co-factors is a position shared by Luc Montagnier, the French virologist and joint recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). [[Special:Contributions/2601:180:8200:C540:CD25:ACDF:ECB7:9418|2601:180:8200:C540:CD25:ACDF:ECB7:9418]] ([[User talk:2601:180:8200:C540:CD25:ACDF:ECB7:9418|talk]]) 18:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== "opposed competition-oriented views" == |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
In 'Symbiosis as evolutionary force': "'''She opposed competition-oriented views of evolution''', stressing the importance of symbiotic or cooperative relationships between species." Can someone clarify this? Surely she gave full credit to competition ''within'' species...? And this needs to be clarified: Did she disagree with the entire notion of competition between species, or simply with that being the overwhelming focus of research and theory? Maybe someone with a deep enough knowledge of her work can fairly address these points. [[User:Heavenlyblue|Heavenlyblue]] ([[User talk:Heavenlyblue|talk]]) 17:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:07, 7 January 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lynn Margulis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Request edit on 28 March 2018
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first. |
- Delete "...with Jerry Coyne notably writing on his Why Evolution is True blog about Margulis' supposed "notion that AIDS is really syphilis, not viral in origin at all." rationale: Jerry Coyne's blog posts are not a reputable source. He often attacked Lynn Margulis for her opposition to neo-Darwinism. His claims that neo-Darwinism explain evolution and speciation have been demonstrated to be scientifically inaccurate.
- Delete "Seth Kalichman, a social psychologist who studies behavioral and social aspects of AIDS, cited her 2009 paper as an example of AIDS denialism "flourishing",[48] and asserted that her "endorsement of HIV/AIDS denialism defies understanding."[49] rationale: The statement "The paper did not question the existence of HIV or AIDS, nor that HIV causes AIDS, but suggested that syphilis could have been a co-factor in the spread of AIDS." which precedes the mention of Seth Kalichman is true and therefore the claim of Seth Kalichman cannot be true and should be deleted. Everyone has a right to their opinion, but not their own set of facts." - Patrick Moynihan
2601:180:8200:C540:156F:42D7:A1F:B175 (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Reply 30-MAR-2018
[edit]I've read the paragraph and reproduced it below for this discussion. In the reproduction I note how each assertion is worded, and discuss whether any of the assertions are "out of place". Please note that this quoted text may have changed in the interim. It reflects only how the article looked as of 06:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC).
In 2009 Margulis and seven others authored a position paper concerning research on the viability of round body forms of some spirochetes, "Syphilis, Lyme disease & AIDS: Resurgence of 'the great imitator'?", which states that, "Detailed research that correlates life histories of symbiotic spirochetes to changes in the immune system of associated vertebrates is sorely needed," and urging the "reinvestigation of the natural history of mammalian, tick-borne, and venereal transmission of spirochetes in relation to impairment of the human immune system."[note 1] The paper did not question the existence of HIV or AIDS, nor that HIV causes AIDS, but suggested that syphilis could have been a co-factor in the spread of AIDS. In a Discover Magazine interview with Dick Teresi published less than six months before her death, however, Margulis spoke provocatively of how, "the set of symptoms, or syndrome, presented by syphilitics overlaps completely with another syndrome: AIDS,"[note 2] and also noted that Kary Mullis, a winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize for the polymerase chain reaction, with unconventional scientific views, said that "he went looking for a reference substantiating that HIV causes AIDS and discovered, 'There is no such document.' "[note 3] This elicited widespread suggestions that Margulis was an "AIDS denialist", with Jerry Coyne notably writing on his Why Evolution is True blog about Margulis' supposed "notion that AIDS is really syphilis, not viral in origin at all."[note 4] Seth Kalichman, a social psychologist who studies behavioral and social aspects of AIDS, cited her 2009 paper[note 5] as an example of AIDS denialism "flourishing", and asserted that her "endorsement[note 6] of HIV/AIDS denialism defies understanding." In the Discover Magazine interview, Margulis discussed with Teresi the primary grounds for her[note 7] initial interest in the material of the 2009 "AIDS" paper, being that "I’m interested in spirochetes only because of our ancestry. I’m not interested in the diseases," and stated that to her the fact that both Treponema (the spirochete which causes syphilis) and Borrelia (the spirochete which causes Lyme disease) only have retained about 20% of the genes they need to live freely outside of their human hosts, they should be considered as symbionts.[note 8]
___________
- ^ This is the assertion made by this particular paper being mentioned at this point in the passage: That the life history of symbiotic spirochetes needs to be examined with regards to how they affect the immune system of other organisms.
- ^ Here Margulis is making assertions outside of the paper, in a magazine interview. The passage clearly states that.
- ^ This is Margulis' assertion of what she believes to be another assertion made by Kary Mullis. According to Margulis, Mullis was unable to locate the document. Whether or not Mullis found the document or was even looking for it is made clear in this passage.
- ^ This is Coyne's assertion, and the text in the passage makes that clear.
- ^ ".....cited her 2009 paper": This could be made more clear who her is referring to. I believe it to be Margulis.
- ^ Another instance of her similar to the first. I believe this is also referring to Margulis. This should be made more clear by using the person's name instead of confusing pronouns.
- ^ This use of her is additionally confusing because we're discussing two women: Margulis and Teresi. Which of them this her refers to is unknown.
- ^ This last section highlighted in red is the most confused and problematic in the entire passage, and it's clear that it was added by a different editor than the ones responsible for the other passages. This sentence needs to be rewritten to remove the pronouns and clarify what it is that is being communicated, and by whom.
The problem areas of the text I've highlighted in red are discussed in the notes. The entire last section is the most problematic. I leave this hear to spark discussion on how it should be handled. The editor who made the COI edit request is asked to help form a consensus for change before reactivating the request. Regards, Spintendo 06:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Reply 04-APR-2018
[edit]I must disagree with the idea that the text outlined in red is the most problematic. Perhaps the biggest problem with the discussion of Lynn Margulis's ideas about various spirochetoses (infections with spirochetes) is that this section should not be called "AIDS/HIV theory". A better title would be "Viability of Spirochete 'round bodies'". This is the subject of the 2009 paper which I was a co-author and an editor. There was then and there still is a controversy, but the controversy is not about HIV/AIDS theory. Instead the controversy is threefold: first, is wheher or not round bodies (a pleomorphic shape that spirochetes may take or in which some spirochetes spend all of their life history in) are viable (alive); second, that antibiotics are guaranteed to cure infections by spirochetes (syphilis and Lyme disease); and third, that the standard tests used for screening for spirochetoses are reliable. Much of mainstream biology and medicine still assume that round bodies are not viable (dead), that antibiotics cure spirochetoses, and that standard screening tests for spirochetoses are reliable. There is abundant evidence (which I can provide if requested) that these assumptions are examples of what Whitehead called the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. That is that they are commonly believed but are in fact not supported by scientific study. Since neither Jerry Coyne nor Seth Kalichman has any expertise on the question of whether or not spirochete round bodies are viable, the question of the effectiveness of antibiotics in treating spirochetoses, and the reliabilty of the standard screening tests in use, I see no reason to include their opinions which are wildly off-the-mark and seem to have been included by someone with a desire to disparage Lynn Margulis with the ad hominem label of "AIDS denialist". As the title of our 2009 paper makes clear, she did not deny the existence of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. What she questioned was whether or not HIV alone was the exclusive causitive agent. Margulis's thinking that AIDS may have co-factors is a position shared by Luc Montagnier, the French virologist and joint recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). 2601:180:8200:C540:CD25:ACDF:ECB7:9418 (talk) 18:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
"opposed competition-oriented views"
[edit]In 'Symbiosis as evolutionary force': "She opposed competition-oriented views of evolution, stressing the importance of symbiotic or cooperative relationships between species." Can someone clarify this? Surely she gave full credit to competition within species...? And this needs to be clarified: Did she disagree with the entire notion of competition between species, or simply with that being the overwhelming focus of research and theory? Maybe someone with a deep enough knowledge of her work can fairly address these points. Heavenlyblue (talk) 17:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class Biology articles
- High-importance Biology articles
- WikiProject Biology articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Chicago articles
- Low-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Massachusetts articles
- Unknown-importance Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject Massachusetts articles
- B-Class University of Massachusetts articles
- Mid-importance University of Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject University of Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- B-Class Women scientists articles
- Mid-importance Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women scientists articles
- B-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors
- Declined requested edits