Country Party (Britain): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(48 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{EngvarB|date=July 2017}} |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2017}} |
|||
{{Infobox political party |
{{Infobox political party |
||
| name = Country Party |
| name = Country Party (1726—1752) |
||
| colorcode = cyan |
|||
| logo = |
|||
| leader = [[Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke]] |
|||
| logo_size = |
|||
| founded = {{start date and age|1726||}} |
|||
| logo_upright = |
|||
| dissolved = {{end date and age|1752||}} |
|||
| logo_alt = |
|||
| merger = [[Commonwealth men]]<br>[[Patriot Whigs]]<br>[[Tories (British political party)|Tories]] |
|||
| caption = |
|||
| successor = [[Patriot (American Revolution)|Patriots]]<br>[[Radicals (UK)|Radicals]]<br>[[Tories (British political party)|Tories]]<br>[[Whigs (British political party)|Whigs]] |
|||
| colorcode = cyan |
|||
| newspaper = ''[[The Craftsman (newspaper)|The Craftsman]]'' |
|||
| abbreviation = <!-- official abbreviation or | abbr = --> |
|||
| ideology = [[Parliamentary opposition]]<br>[[Populism]]<br>[[Anti-corruption]] |
|||
| leader = [[Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke|Henry St John]] |
|||
| position = [[Syncretic politics|Syncretic]] |
|||
| president = |
|||
| |
| country = the United Kingdom |
||
| secretary = |
|||
| general_secretary = |
|||
| first_secretary = |
|||
| secretary_general = |
|||
| presidium = |
|||
| governing_body = |
|||
| standing_committee = |
|||
| spokesperson = <!-- or | spokesman = --> |
|||
| leader1_title = |
|||
| leader1_name = |
|||
| leader2_title = |
|||
| leader2_name = |
|||
| leader3_title = |
|||
| leader3_name = |
|||
| leader4_title = |
|||
| leader4_name = |
|||
| leader5_title = |
|||
| leader5_name = |
|||
| founder = <!-- or | founders = --> |
|||
| founded = {{start date and age|1726||}} |
|||
| registered = |
|||
| legalised = <!-- or | legalized = --> |
|||
| dissolved = {{end date and age|1752||}} |
|||
| merger = [[Commonwealth men]]<br>[[Patriot Whigs]]<br>[[Tories]] |
|||
| split = |
|||
| predecessor = |
|||
| merged = |
|||
| successor = [[Patriot (American Revolution)|Patriots]]<br>[[Radicals (UK)|Radicals]]<br>[[Tories (British political party)|Tories]]<br>[[Whigs (British political party)|Whigs]] |
|||
| headquarters = |
|||
| newspaper = ''[[The Craftsman (newspaper)|The Craftsman]]'' |
|||
| think_tank = |
|||
| student_wing = |
|||
| youth_wing = |
|||
| womens_wing = |
|||
| wing1_title = |
|||
| wing1 = |
|||
| wing2_title = |
|||
| wing2 = |
|||
| wing3_title = |
|||
| wing3 = |
|||
| wing4_title = |
|||
| wing4 = |
|||
| membership_year = |
|||
| membership = |
|||
| ideology = [[Parliamentary opposition]] |
|||
| position = [[Syncretic politics|Syncretic]] |
|||
| religion = |
|||
| national = |
|||
| regional = <!-- or | regional affiliation = --> |
|||
| european = |
|||
| continental = <!-- or | continental affiliation = --> |
|||
| international = |
|||
| europarl = |
|||
| affiliation1_title = |
|||
| affiliation1 = |
|||
| affiliation2_title = |
|||
| affiliation2 = |
|||
| colors = <!-- or | colours = --> |
|||
| slogan = |
|||
| anthem = |
|||
| blank1_title = |
|||
| blank1 = |
|||
| blank2_title = |
|||
| blank2 = |
|||
| blank3_title = |
|||
| blank3 = |
|||
| blank4_title = |
|||
| blank4 = |
|||
| seats1_title = |
|||
| seats1 = <!-- {{Infobox political party/seats|50|100|hex=#ff0000}} --> |
|||
| seats2_title = |
|||
| seats2 = |
|||
| seats3_title = |
|||
| seats3 = |
|||
| seats4_title = <!-- up to | seats11_title = --> |
|||
| seats4 = <!-- up to | seats11 = --> |
|||
| symbol = |
|||
| flag = |
|||
| flag_title = |
|||
| flag_alt = |
|||
| website = |
|||
| state = <!-- or | country = --> |
|||
| country = Great Britain |
|||
| country_dab1 = |
|||
| parties_dab1 = |
|||
| elections_dab1 = |
|||
| country2 = |
|||
| country_dab2 = |
|||
| parties_dab2 = |
|||
| elections_dab2 = |
|||
| footnotes = |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{EngvarB|date=July 2017}} |
|||
In Britain in the period from the 1680s to the 1740s, and especially under the [[Walpole ministry]] from 1730 to 1743, the '''country Party''' was a coalition of [[Tories]] and disaffected [[Whig (British political party)|Whigs]]. It was a movement rather than an organised party and had no formal structure or leaders. It claimed to be a nonpartisan force fighting for the nation's interest—the whole "country"—against the self-interested actions of the '''court party''', that is the politicians in power in London. Country men believed the court party was corrupting Britain by using [[patronage]] to buy support and was threatening English and Scottish liberties and the proper balance of authority by shifting power from Parliament to the [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom| prime minister]]. It sought to constrain the court by opposing [[standing army|standing armies]], calling for annual elections to Parliament (instead of the seven-year term in effect), and wanted to fix power in the hands of the [[landed gentry]] rather than the royal officials, urban merchants or bankers. It opposed any practices it saw as corruption. |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2017}} |
|||
'''Country Party''' was the name employed in the [[Kingdom of England]] (and later in [[Great Britain]]) by political movements which campaigned in opposition to the '''Court Party''' (that is, the [[Ministers of the Crown]] and those who supported them). |
|||
In the late 1600s, it was used to denote what would later become known as the [[Whigs (British political party)|Whig Party]], characterised by its opposition to [[absolute monarchy]]; in the early to middle 1700s it was taken up by opponents of the Whig [[Walpole ministry]], which they claimed was acting tyrannically and against the interest of the British nation and its people. |
|||
The Country Party attracted a number of influential writers (such as [[Jonathan Swift]], [[Samuel Johnson]], and [[Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun]]) and political theorists. The ideology of the party faded away in England but became a powerful force in the [[Thirteen Colonies|American colonies]], where its tracts strongly motivated the [[Patriot (American Revolution)|Patriots]] to oppose what the country party had cast as British monarchical tyranny and to develop a powerful political philosophy of [[republicanism in the United States]].<ref>See Bernard Bailyn, ''The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution'' (1967); Gordon S. Wood, ''The Creation of the American Republic'' (1969); and J.G.A. Pocock, ''The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition'' (1975). </ref> |
|||
== History == |
|||
Historically, the name "country party" was used by what became the Whig Party itself in its initial stages, when headed by the [[Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury|Earl of Shaftesbury]] during the [[Exclusion Crisis]] of 1679-1681. Then, the term "[[Whiggamore Raid|whiggamor]]", shortened to "Whig", started being applied to the party - first as a pejorative term, then adopted and taken up by the party itself. The name "country party" was thus discarded - to be taken up later by opponents of the Whig Party itself, once it had come to dominate British politics following the [[Glorious Revolution]]. |
|||
=== Original Country Party === |
|||
The [[Whigs (British political party)#Exclusion Crisis|original Country Party]] was a faction which opposed absolute monarchism and favoured [[Exclusion Crisis|exclusionism]]. |
|||
In the late 1670s, the term "[[Whiggamore Raid|whiggamor]]", shortened to "Whig", started being applied to the party – first as a pejorative term, then adopted and taken up by the party itself. The name "Country Party" was thus discarded – to be taken up later by opponents of the Whig Party itself, once it had come to dominate British politics following the [[Glorious Revolution]]. |
|||
==Country persuasion== |
|||
{{See also|Patriot Whigs|The Craftsman (newspaper)}} |
|||
The historian Hoppit has interpreted that around 1700 instead of a country "party", the English electorate, its Lords and its elected representatives had a country persuasion with key consensus demands that the government should be frugal and efficient, opposition to high taxes, a concern for personal liberty, a quest for more frequent elections, a faith that the local militia would substitute for a dangerous standing army, a desire for such moral reforms as temperance in an age of drunkenness, and less Sabbath breaking. The country leaders stressed the civic duty of the upper class to engage in politics to strengthen the national interest.<ref>Julian Hoppit, ''A Land of Liberty?: England 1689–1727'' (2000) p. 159</ref> Such views amount to the main counter to extreme [[High Tory]] [[hegemony]] and the similar [[wikt:bigwig|bigwig]] [[Whigs (British political party)|Whig Party]] [[Cabal ministry|cabal]] which in its estimation morphed via other executives into the [[Robert Walpole|Walpole executive]] [[placemen]]. |
|||
=== Country Party (1726—1752) === |
|||
==Bolingbroke== |
|||
During the period from the 1680s to the 1740s, and especially under the [[Walpole ministry]] from 1730 to 1743, the Country Party was a coalition of [[Tories (British political party)|Tories]] and disaffected [[Whig (British political party)|Whigs]]. |
|||
[[Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke]] was especially influential in stating the need and outlining the machinery of a systematic [[parliamentary opposition]]. Such an opposition he called a "country party" which he opposed to the court party. Country parties had been formed before, for instance after the king's speech to Parliament in November 1685, but Bolingbroke was the first to state the need for a continual opposition to the government. To his mind the spirit of liberty was threatened by the court party's lust for power.<ref>Caroline Robbins, "'Discordant Parties": A Study of the Acceptance of Party by Englishmen,'" ''Political Science Quarterly'' Vol. 73, No. 4 (Dec. 1958), pp. 505–529 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2146028 in JSTOR]</ref> |
|||
It was a movement rather than an organised party and had no formal structure or leaders. It claimed to be a nonpartisan force fighting for the nation's interest—the whole "country"—against the self-interested actions of the politicians in power in London (the "Court Party"). Country men believed the Court Party was corrupting Britain by using [[patronage]] to buy support and was threatening English and Scottish liberties and the proper balance of authority by shifting power from Parliament to the [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom| prime minister]]. It sought to constrain the court by opposing [[standing army|standing armies]], calling for annual elections to Parliament (instead of the seven-year term in effect), and wanted to fix power in the hands of the [[landed gentry]] rather than the royal officials, urban merchants or bankers. It opposed any practices it saw as [[corruption]]. |
|||
The Country Party attracted a number of influential writers (such as [[Jonathan Swift]], [[Samuel Johnson]], and [[Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun]]) and political theorists. The ideology of the party faded away in England but became a powerful force in the [[Thirteen Colonies|American colonies]], where its tracts strongly motivated the [[Patriot (American Revolution)|Patriots]] to oppose what the Country Party had cast as British monarchical tyranny and to develop a powerful political philosophy of [[republicanism in the United States]].{{sfn|Bailyn|1967}}<ref>{{cite book |first=Gordon S. |last=Wood |title=The Creation of the American Republic |date=1969}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=J. G. A. |last=Pocock |author-link=J. G. A. Pocock |title=The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition |date=1975}}</ref> |
|||
==== Bolingbroke ==== |
|||
[[Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke]] was especially influential in stating the need and outlining the machinery of a systematic [[parliamentary opposition]]. Such an opposition he called a "country party" which he opposed to the court party. Country parties had been formed before, for instance after the king's speech to Parliament in November 1685, but Bolingbroke was the first to state the need for a continual opposition to the government. To his mind the spirit of liberty was threatened by the court party's lust for power.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Caroline |last=Robbins |title='Discordant Parties': A Study of the Acceptance of Party by Englishmen |journal=Political Science Quarterly |volume=73 |issue=4 |date=December 1958 |pages=505–529 |doi=10.2307/2146028 |jstor=2146028}}</ref> |
|||
Liberty could only be safeguarded by an opposition party that used "constitutional methods and a legal course of opposition to the excesses of legal and ministerial power…".<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the Idea of a Patriot King'' p. 117</ref> He instructed the opposition party to "Wrest the power of government, if you can, out of the hands that employed it weakly and wickedly"<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the Spirit of Patriotism'' p. 42</ref> This work could be done only by a homogeneous party "…because such a party alone will submit to a drudgery of this kind".<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the idea of a Patriot King'' p. 170</ref> It did not suffice to be eager to speak, keen to act. "They who affect to head an opposition, …, must be equal, at least, to those whom they oppose…".<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the Spirit of Patriotism'' p. 58</ref> The opposition had to be of a permanent nature to make sure that it would be looked at as a part of daily politics. It had to contrast, on every occasion, the government.<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the Spirit of Patriotism'' p. 61</ref> He considered a party that systematically opposed the government to be more appealing than a party that occasionally opposed the government. This opposition had to prepare itself to control government.<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the Spirit of Patriotism'' pp. 61–3</ref> |
Liberty could only be safeguarded by an opposition party that used "constitutional methods and a legal course of opposition to the excesses of legal and ministerial power…".<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the Idea of a Patriot King'' p. 117</ref> He instructed the opposition party to "Wrest the power of government, if you can, out of the hands that employed it weakly and wickedly"<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the Spirit of Patriotism'' p. 42</ref> This work could be done only by a homogeneous party "…because such a party alone will submit to a drudgery of this kind".<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the idea of a Patriot King'' p. 170</ref> It did not suffice to be eager to speak, keen to act. "They who affect to head an opposition, …, must be equal, at least, to those whom they oppose…".<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the Spirit of Patriotism'' p. 58</ref> The opposition had to be of a permanent nature to make sure that it would be looked at as a part of daily politics. It had to contrast, on every occasion, the government.<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the Spirit of Patriotism'' p. 61</ref> He considered a party that systematically opposed the government to be more appealing than a party that occasionally opposed the government. This opposition had to prepare itself to control government.<ref>Bolingbroke, ''On the Spirit of Patriotism'' pp. 61–3</ref> |
||
==Country persuasion== |
|||
{{See also|Patriot Whigs|The Craftsman (newspaper)}} |
|||
The historian [[Julian Hoppit]] has interpreted that around 1700 instead of a country "party", the English electorate, its Lords and its elected representatives had a country persuasion with key consensus demands that the government should be frugal and efficient, opposition to high taxes, a concern for personal liberty, a quest for more frequent elections, a faith that the local militia would substitute for a dangerous standing army, a desire for such moral reforms as temperance in an age of drunkenness, and less Sabbath breaking. The country leaders stressed the civic duty of the upper class to engage in politics to strengthen the national interest.<ref>Julian Hoppit, ''A Land of Liberty?: England 1689–1727'' (2000) p. 159</ref> Such views amount to the main counter to extreme [[High Tory]] [[hegemony]] and the similar [[wikt:bigwig|bigwig]] [[Whigs (British political party)|Whig Party]] [[Cabal ministry|cabal]] which in its estimation morphed via other executives into the [[Robert Walpole|Walpole executive]] [[placemen]]. |
|||
==Americans== |
==Americans== |
||
Line 124: | Line 44: | ||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
{{columns-list| |
|||
* [[Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke]] (1678–1751) |
* [[Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke]] (1678–1751) |
||
* [[Cato's Letters]] |
* [[Cato's Letters]] |
||
Line 144: | Line 65: | ||
* [[Whig (British political party)]] |
* [[Whig (British political party)]] |
||
* [[Whiggism]] |
* [[Whiggism]] |
||
}} |
|||
==Notes== |
==Notes== |
||
{{reflist |
{{reflist}} |
||
== |
==Bibliography== |
||
* Bailyn |
* {{cite book |last=Bailyn |first=Bernard |author-link=Bernard Bailyn |title=[[The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution]] |publisher=Belknap Press |date=1967 |isbn=0-674-44301-2}} |
||
* {{cite book |last=Bolingbroke |first=Henry St John |author-link=Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke |title=On the Idea of a Patriot King |date=1738}} |
|||
* Colbourn, Trevor. ''The Lamp of Experience: Whig History and the Intellectual Origins of the American Revolution'' (1965) |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Bolingbroke |first=Henry St John |author-link=Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke |title=On the Spirit of Patriotism |date=1749}} |
|||
* Hutson, James H. "Country, Court, and Constitution: Antifederalism and the Historians," ''William and Mary Quarterly'' Vol. 38, No. 3 (Jul. 1981), pp. 337–368 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1921952 in JSTOR] |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Colbourn |first=Trevor |author-link=Trevor Colbourn |title=The Lamp of Experience: Whig History and the Intellectual Origins of the American Revolution |publisher=Institute of Early American History and Culture at Williamsburg, Virginia |date=1965 |isbn=0-8078-0958-6}} |
|||
*Jones, J.R. ''Country and court: England, 1658–1714'' (Arnold, 1978) {{ISBN|0-7131-6103-5}} |
|||
* {{cite journal |last=Hutson |first=James H. |title=Country, Court, and Constitution: Antifederalism and the Historians |journal=William and Mary Quarterly |volume=38 |issue=3 |date=July 1981 |pages=337–368 |doi=10.2307/1921952 |jstor=1921952}} |
|||
* Kramnick, Isaac. ''Republicanism and Bourgeois Radicalism: Political Ideology in Late Eighteenth-Century England and America'' (1990) |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Jones |first=James R. |title=Country and Court: England, 1658–1714 |publisher=[[Edward Arnold (publisher)|Edward Arnold]] |date=1978 |isbn=0-7131-6103-5}} |
|||
* Kramnick, Isaac. ''Bolingbroke and His Circle: The Politics of Nostalgia in the Age of Walpole'' (1992) |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Kramnick |first=Isaac |author-link=Isaac Kramnick |title=Republicanism and Bourgeois Radicalism: Political Ideology in Late Eighteenth-Century England and America |date=1990 |publisher=Cornell University Press |isbn=0-8014-9589-X}} |
|||
* Murrin, John M. "The Great Inversion, or Court versus Country: A Comparison of the Revolution Settlements in England (1688–721) and America (1776–1816)," in J.G.A. Pocock, ed., ''Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688, 1776'' (Princeton UP 1980), 368–455 |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Kramnick |first=Isaac |author-link=Isaac Kramnick |title=Bolingbroke and His Circle: The Politics of Nostalgia in the Age of Walpole |date=1992 |publisher=Cornell University Press |isbn=0-8014-8001-9}} |
|||
* Robbins, Caroline. ''The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transmission, Development, and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies'' (1959, 2004). |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Murrin |first=John M. |chapter=The Great Inversion, or Court versus Country: A Comparison of the Revolution Settlements in England (1688–721) and America (1776–1816) |editor-first=J. G. A. |editor-last=Pocock |editor-link=J. G. A. Pocock |title=Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688, 1776 |url={{GBurl|h9f_AwAAQBAJ}} |publisher=Princeton University Press |date=1980 |pages=368–455 |chapter-url={{GBurl|h9f_AwAAQBAJ|page=368}}}} |
|||
* Ward, Lee, ''The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America'' (Cambridge University Press, 2004) |
|||
* {{cite book |first=J. G. A. |last=Pocock |author-link=J. G. A. Pocock |title=[[The Machiavellian Moment]]: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition |date=1975 |publisher=Princeton University Press}} |
|||
* Zagorin, Peter. "The Court and the Country: A Note on Political Terminology in the Earlier Seventeenth Century," ''English Historical Review,'' Vol. 77, No. 303, Apr. 1962 pp 306+ [https://www.jstor.org/pss/561547 in JSTOR] |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Robbins |first=Caroline |title=The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transmission, Development, and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies |orig-date=1959 |date=2004 |url={{GBurl|kmohAQAAIAAJ}} |publisher=Liberty Fund}} |
|||
* {{cite book |last=Ward |first=Lee |title=The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url={{GBurl|uPcBYBteYKEC}} |date=2004 |isbn=0-521-82745-0}} |
|||
* {{cite book |first=Gordon S. |last=Wood |title=The Creation of the American Republic |date=1969 |publisher=Institute of Early American History and Culture at Williamsburg, Virginia}} |
|||
* {{cite journal |last=Zagorin |first=Peter |title=The Court and the Country: A Note on Political Terminology in the Earlier Seventeenth Century |journal=English Historical Review |volume=77 |issue=303 |date=April 1962 |pages=306–311 |doi=10.1093/ehr/LXXVII.CCCIII.306 |jstor=561547}} |
|||
{{Political ideologies}} |
{{Political ideologies}} |
||
Line 170: | Line 95: | ||
[[Category:Political culture]] |
[[Category:Political culture]] |
||
[[Category:Political history of England]] |
[[Category:Political history of England]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Politics of the Kingdom of Great Britain]] |
||
[[Category:Defunct political parties in the United Kingdom]] |
[[Category:Defunct political parties in the United Kingdom]] |
Latest revision as of 07:28, 7 January 2024
Country Party (1726—1752) | |
---|---|
Leader | Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke |
Founded | 1726 |
Dissolved | 1752 |
Merger of | Commonwealth men Patriot Whigs Tories |
Succeeded by | Patriots Radicals Tories Whigs |
Newspaper | The Craftsman |
Ideology | Parliamentary opposition Populism Anti-corruption |
Political position | Syncretic |
Country Party was the name employed in the Kingdom of England (and later in Great Britain) by political movements which campaigned in opposition to the Court Party (that is, the Ministers of the Crown and those who supported them).
In the late 1600s, it was used to denote what would later become known as the Whig Party, characterised by its opposition to absolute monarchy; in the early to middle 1700s it was taken up by opponents of the Whig Walpole ministry, which they claimed was acting tyrannically and against the interest of the British nation and its people.
History
[edit]Original Country Party
[edit]The original Country Party was a faction which opposed absolute monarchism and favoured exclusionism.
In the late 1670s, the term "whiggamor", shortened to "Whig", started being applied to the party – first as a pejorative term, then adopted and taken up by the party itself. The name "Country Party" was thus discarded – to be taken up later by opponents of the Whig Party itself, once it had come to dominate British politics following the Glorious Revolution.
Country Party (1726—1752)
[edit]During the period from the 1680s to the 1740s, and especially under the Walpole ministry from 1730 to 1743, the Country Party was a coalition of Tories and disaffected Whigs.
It was a movement rather than an organised party and had no formal structure or leaders. It claimed to be a nonpartisan force fighting for the nation's interest—the whole "country"—against the self-interested actions of the politicians in power in London (the "Court Party"). Country men believed the Court Party was corrupting Britain by using patronage to buy support and was threatening English and Scottish liberties and the proper balance of authority by shifting power from Parliament to the prime minister. It sought to constrain the court by opposing standing armies, calling for annual elections to Parliament (instead of the seven-year term in effect), and wanted to fix power in the hands of the landed gentry rather than the royal officials, urban merchants or bankers. It opposed any practices it saw as corruption.
The Country Party attracted a number of influential writers (such as Jonathan Swift, Samuel Johnson, and Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun) and political theorists. The ideology of the party faded away in England but became a powerful force in the American colonies, where its tracts strongly motivated the Patriots to oppose what the Country Party had cast as British monarchical tyranny and to develop a powerful political philosophy of republicanism in the United States.[1][2][3]
Bolingbroke
[edit]Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke was especially influential in stating the need and outlining the machinery of a systematic parliamentary opposition. Such an opposition he called a "country party" which he opposed to the court party. Country parties had been formed before, for instance after the king's speech to Parliament in November 1685, but Bolingbroke was the first to state the need for a continual opposition to the government. To his mind the spirit of liberty was threatened by the court party's lust for power.[4]
Liberty could only be safeguarded by an opposition party that used "constitutional methods and a legal course of opposition to the excesses of legal and ministerial power…".[5] He instructed the opposition party to "Wrest the power of government, if you can, out of the hands that employed it weakly and wickedly"[6] This work could be done only by a homogeneous party "…because such a party alone will submit to a drudgery of this kind".[7] It did not suffice to be eager to speak, keen to act. "They who affect to head an opposition, …, must be equal, at least, to those whom they oppose…".[8] The opposition had to be of a permanent nature to make sure that it would be looked at as a part of daily politics. It had to contrast, on every occasion, the government.[9] He considered a party that systematically opposed the government to be more appealing than a party that occasionally opposed the government. This opposition had to prepare itself to control government.[10]
Country persuasion
[edit]The historian Julian Hoppit has interpreted that around 1700 instead of a country "party", the English electorate, its Lords and its elected representatives had a country persuasion with key consensus demands that the government should be frugal and efficient, opposition to high taxes, a concern for personal liberty, a quest for more frequent elections, a faith that the local militia would substitute for a dangerous standing army, a desire for such moral reforms as temperance in an age of drunkenness, and less Sabbath breaking. The country leaders stressed the civic duty of the upper class to engage in politics to strengthen the national interest.[11] Such views amount to the main counter to extreme High Tory hegemony and the similar bigwig Whig Party cabal which in its estimation morphed via other executives into the Walpole executive placemen.
Americans
[edit]The writings of the country party were eagerly devoured by some American colonists who came to fear the corruption of the English court as the greatest threat to the colonies’ desired liberties. They formed a Patriot cause in the Thirteen Colonies and used the country party ideas to help form Republicanism in the United States. Hutson identified country ideology as a major influence on the Antifederalists during the debate over the ratification of the United States Constitution.[12] Similarly, Jeffersonianism inherited the country party attack on elitism, centralization, and distant government during the ascent of Alexander Hamilton and other Federalists.[13]
See also
[edit]- Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke (1678–1751)
- Cato's Letters
- Commonwealth men
- Richard Cumberland (1632–1718)
- Andrew Fletcher (1655–1716)
- Thomas Gordon (1692–1750)
- James Harrington (1611–1677)
- Thomas Hollis (1720–1774)
- Francis Hutcheson (1694–1746)
- Samuel Johnson (1709–1784)
- John Millar (1735–1801)
- William Molyneux (1656–1698)
- The Oglethorpe Plan
- Richard Price (1723–1791)
- Republicanism
- Shaftesbury (1671–1713)
- Jonathan Swift (1667–1745)
- John Trenchard, (1662–1723)
- Whig (British political party)
- Whiggism
Notes
[edit]- ^ Bailyn 1967.
- ^ Wood, Gordon S. (1969). The Creation of the American Republic.
- ^ Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition.
- ^ Robbins, Caroline (December 1958). "'Discordant Parties': A Study of the Acceptance of Party by Englishmen". Political Science Quarterly. 73 (4): 505–529. doi:10.2307/2146028. JSTOR 2146028.
- ^ Bolingbroke, On the Idea of a Patriot King p. 117
- ^ Bolingbroke, On the Spirit of Patriotism p. 42
- ^ Bolingbroke, On the idea of a Patriot King p. 170
- ^ Bolingbroke, On the Spirit of Patriotism p. 58
- ^ Bolingbroke, On the Spirit of Patriotism p. 61
- ^ Bolingbroke, On the Spirit of Patriotism pp. 61–3
- ^ Julian Hoppit, A Land of Liberty?: England 1689–1727 (2000) p. 159
- ^ Hutson, James H. (July 1981). "Country, Court, and Constitution: Antifederalism and the Historians". The William and Mary Quarterly. 38 (3): 337–368. doi:10.2307/1921952. JSTOR 1921952.
- ^ Wilson, Clyde (18 February 2017). "American Populism and the Power of the State". theimaginativeconservative.org. The Imaginative Conservative.
Bibliography
[edit]- Bailyn, Bernard (1967). The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Belknap Press. ISBN 0-674-44301-2.
- Bolingbroke, Henry St John (1738). On the Idea of a Patriot King.
- Bolingbroke, Henry St John (1749). On the Spirit of Patriotism.
- Colbourn, Trevor (1965). The Lamp of Experience: Whig History and the Intellectual Origins of the American Revolution. Institute of Early American History and Culture at Williamsburg, Virginia. ISBN 0-8078-0958-6.
- Hutson, James H. (July 1981). "Country, Court, and Constitution: Antifederalism and the Historians". William and Mary Quarterly. 38 (3): 337–368. doi:10.2307/1921952. JSTOR 1921952.
- Jones, James R. (1978). Country and Court: England, 1658–1714. Edward Arnold. ISBN 0-7131-6103-5.
- Kramnick, Isaac (1990). Republicanism and Bourgeois Radicalism: Political Ideology in Late Eighteenth-Century England and America. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-9589-X.
- Kramnick, Isaac (1992). Bolingbroke and His Circle: The Politics of Nostalgia in the Age of Walpole. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-8001-9.
- Murrin, John M. (1980). "The Great Inversion, or Court versus Country: A Comparison of the Revolution Settlements in England (1688–721) and America (1776–1816)". In Pocock, J. G. A. (ed.). Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688, 1776. Princeton University Press. pp. 368–455.
- Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton University Press.
- Robbins, Caroline (2004) [1959]. The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transmission, Development, and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies. Liberty Fund.
- Ward, Lee (2004). The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-82745-0.
- Wood, Gordon S. (1969). The Creation of the American Republic. Institute of Early American History and Culture at Williamsburg, Virginia.
- Zagorin, Peter (April 1962). "The Court and the Country: A Note on Political Terminology in the Earlier Seventeenth Century". English Historical Review. 77 (303): 306–311. doi:10.1093/ehr/LXXVII.CCCIII.306. JSTOR 561547.
- 1726 establishments in Great Britain
- 1752 disestablishments in Great Britain
- Political parties established in 1726
- Political parties disestablished in 1752
- Whiggism
- Political ideologies
- Political culture
- Political history of England
- Politics of the Kingdom of Great Britain
- Defunct political parties in the United Kingdom