Jump to content

Talk:Absorption band: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
added spectroscopy project box
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Spectroscopy}}, {{WikiProject Physics}}, {{WikiProject Chemistry}}.
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SpectroscopyProject|class=|importance=}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Spectroscopy|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Physics|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Chemistry|importance=Mid}}
}}

==Category==
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization says "An article should not be in both a category and its subcategory, e.g. Microsoft Office is in Category:Microsoft software, so should not also be in Category:Software. ". Absorption band is assigned both Electromagnetism and Physics, I feel its redundant. Electromagnetism, Spectroscopy would be more appropriate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization says "An article should not be in both a category and its subcategory, e.g. Microsoft Office is in Category:Microsoft software, so should not also be in Category:Software. ". Absorption band is assigned both Electromagnetism and Physics, I feel its redundant. Electromagnetism, Spectroscopy would be more appropriate.

== Merge with "[[Absorption bands]]" - which redirects to "[[spectral line]]"? ==

--[[User:Haraldmmueller]] 15:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

== Confusion with [[spectral line]] ==

There's some confusion between this article and [[spectral line]], which has a lot of the same information without immediately diving into the quantum mechanical details. This whole article could be trimmed down and merged, as there is some seriously lacking info that is contained in [[spectral line]] that you wouldn't immediately get (e.g., the "fingerprinting" analogy) from a link here (as there was from [[Holmium#History]], which I just redirected). [[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]] ([[User talk:Reconrabbit|talk]]) 18:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:54, 9 January 2024

Category

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization says "An article should not be in both a category and its subcategory, e.g. Microsoft Office is in Category:Microsoft software, so should not also be in Category:Software. ". Absorption band is assigned both Electromagnetism and Physics, I feel its redundant. Electromagnetism, Spectroscopy would be more appropriate.

Merge with "Absorption bands" - which redirects to "spectral line"?

[edit]

--User:Haraldmmueller 15:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion with spectral line

[edit]

There's some confusion between this article and spectral line, which has a lot of the same information without immediately diving into the quantum mechanical details. This whole article could be trimmed down and merged, as there is some seriously lacking info that is contained in spectral line that you wouldn't immediately get (e.g., the "fingerprinting" analogy) from a link here (as there was from Holmium#History, which I just redirected). Reconrabbit (talk) 18:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]