Jump to content

Talk:Emil Nolde: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m WikiProjects.
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Visual arts}}, {{WikiProject Denmark}}, {{WikiProject Germany}}.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=C|a&e-work-group=yes|listas=Nolde, Emil}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Nolde, Emil|1=
{{WikiProject Visual arts|class=C}}
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject Denmark|class=C|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Visual arts}}
{{WikiProject Germany|class=C|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Denmark|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=Mid}}
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Artists|class=C}}
}}


==Untitled==
==Untitled==

Latest revision as of 07:08, 9 January 2024

Untitled

[edit]

What does his years of travel mean? Thanks, Ejrrjs | What? 20:09, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nazi affiliations

[edit]

It is somewhat disingenuous to say that Nolde supported the Nazi Party "when it took power"; he had been a member of the party since the early 1920s and was one of Joseph Goebbels' favourite painters, much to Hitler's annoyance. The relationships between the artistic avant garde and the political Right of the inter-war period is more complex than many people suppose and Nolde's relationship with, and commitment to, the Nazi Party illustrates this well. Gerry Carr 17:28, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

[edit]

I added a merge proposal to the front of this article. Someone has suggested that the article titled "Nolde" be merged with this one. That makes sense to me, since there is no special purpose served by having two articles for the same person. Unfortunately, no-one on this page would know there is such a proposal, so I have belatedly added the notice. Any objections to or support for a merger? Ande B 19:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I agree totally. There´s not need for two Emil Nolde articles in here. User:Mistico

there should be alot more to this story, because i am in highschool and i know that if i was literature school that page would never make it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.230.222.114 (talk) 18:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nolde g.jpg

[edit]

Image:Nolde g.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emil Nolde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]