Jump to content

1964 Winchester by-election: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Expanding
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|UK Parliamentary by-election}}
The '''1964 [[Winchester (UK Parliament constituency)|Winchester]] [[by-election]]''' was held on 14 May 1964. It was held after the incumbent [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] MP [[Peter Smithers]] was appointed as the [[Secretary-General of the Council of Europe]]. It was retained by the Conservative candidate [[Morgan Morgan-Giles]].
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2019}}
{{EngvarB|date=August 2019}}
The '''1964 [[Winchester (UK Parliament constituency)|Winchester]] [[by-election]]''' was held on 14 May 1964. It was held after the incumbent [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] MP [[Peter Smithers]] was appointed as the [[Secretary-General of the Council of Europe]]. It was retained for the Conservative Party by their candidate [[Morgan Morgan-Giles]].


==Background==
==Background==
The by-election was one of four (the others being [[Bury St Edmunds by-election, 1964|Bury St Edmunds]], [[Devizes by-election, 1964|Devizes]] and [[Rutherglen by-election, 1964|Rutherglen]] being held on the same day in which the seat was being defended by a candidate supporting the incumbent [[Conservative government, 1957–1964|Conservative government]]. With a [[United Kingdom general election, 1964|general election due later in the year]], the results were anticipated with interest as pointer to what might happen at the election.<ref name="GHfront14051964">{{cite news |title=Testing the Electorate. Hopes and Fears in Four Constituencies|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=GGgVawPscysC&dat=19640514&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |accessdate=29 July 2018 |work=The Glasgow Herald |date=14 May 1964}}</ref> According to ''The [[Glasgow Herald]]'' unlike the other three seats, Winchester was expected to be an easy win for the Conservatives, although it was expected that the Conservative majority would be cut.<ref name="GHfront14051964"/>
The by-election was one of four (the others being [[1964 Bury St Edmunds by-election|Bury St Edmunds]], [[1964 Devizes by-election|Devizes]] and [[1964 Rutherglen by-election|Rutherglen]] being held on the same day in which the seat was being defended by a candidate supporting the incumbent [[Conservative government, 1957–1964|Conservative government]]. With a [[1964 United Kingdom general election|general election due later in the year]], the results were anticipated with interest as pointer to what might happen at the election.<ref name="GHfront14051964">{{cite news |title=Testing the Electorate. Hopes and Fears in Four Constituencies|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=GGgVawPscysC&dat=19640514&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |accessdate=29 July 2018 |work=The Glasgow Herald |date=14 May 1964}}</ref> According to ''[[The Glasgow Herald]]'', unlike the other three seats, Winchester was expected to be an easy win for the Conservatives, although it was expected that the Conservative majority would be cut.<ref name="GHfront14051964"/>


==Result==
==Result==
{{Election box begin |
{{Election box begin |
|title=Winchester by-election, 1964<ref>{{cite web|url=http://geocities.com/by_elections/64.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090831055341/http://geocities.com/by_elections/64.html|title=1964 By Election Results|archive-date=2009-08-31 |dead-url=yes|access-date=2015-09-19}}</ref>}}
|title=Winchester by-election, 1964<ref>{{cite web|url=http://geocities.com/by_elections/64.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090831055341/http://geocities.com/by_elections/64.html|title=1964 By Election Results|archive-date=2009-08-31 |url-status=dead|access-date=2015-09-19}}</ref>}}
{{Election box candidate with party link|
{{Election box winning candidate with party link|
|party = Conservative Party (UK)
|party = Conservative Party (UK)
|candidate = [[Morgan Morgan-Giles]]
|candidate = [[Morgan Morgan-Giles]]
Line 16: Line 19:
{{Election box candidate with party link|
{{Election box candidate with party link|
|party = Labour Party (UK)
|party = Labour Party (UK)
|candidate = C.P. Seyd
|candidate = C. Patrick Seyd
|votes = 11,968
|votes = 11,968
|percentage = 34.62
|percentage = 34.62
Line 26: Line 29:
|votes = 4,567
|votes = 4,567
|percentage = 13.21
|percentage = 13.21
|change = +13.21
|change = ''New''
}}
}}
{{Election box majority|
{{Election box majority|
|votes = 6,064
|votes = 6,064
|percentage = 17.54
|percentage = 17.55
|change = -26.98
|change = -26.98
}}
}}
{{Election box turnout|
{{Election box turnout|
|votes = 34567
|votes = 34,567
|percentage =
|percentage =
|change =
|change =
Line 45: Line 48:


==Aftermath==
==Aftermath==
While the Conservatives held Winchester, it was reported that if the swing of 8.5% from Conservative to Labour were repeated at the general election it would give the latter a majority of over 170 seats. However the result at Devizes showed a much lower swing to Labour.<ref name="GH15051964">{{cite news |title=Socialists' Smell of Election Victory |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=GGgVawPscysC&dat=19640515&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |accessdate=29 July 2018 |work=The Glasgow Herald |date=15 May 1964}}</ref>
While the Conservatives held Winchester, it was reported that if the swing of 8.5% from Conservative to Labour were repeated at the general election it would give the latter a majority of over 170 seats. However, the result at Devizes showed a much lower swing to Labour.<ref name="GH15051964">{{cite news |title=Socialists' Smell of Election Victory |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=GGgVawPscysC&dat=19640515&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |accessdate=29 July 2018 |work=The Glasgow Herald |date=15 May 1964}}</ref> The Conservatives lost Rutherglen, but held Bury St Edmund's, the last of the seats to declare, with what was reported by ''The Glasgow Herald'' to be a smaller swing against them than expected. The same newspaper noted that while the four results gave a mixed picture, with Winchester seeing the biggest swing against the Conservatives, overall they cast doubt on opinion polls suggesting a significant national Labour lead and perhaps would give [[Harold Wilson]] "the first faint incredulous thoughts" that he might not prevail at the coming general election.<ref name="GHp7-16May1964">{{cite news |title=Government Retain Bury St Edmunds. Happier Days Again for Tory Workers |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=GGgVawPscysC&dat=19640516&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |access-date=16 October 2021 |work=The Glasgow Herald |date=16 May 1964 |page=7}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 52: Line 55:
{{By-elections to the 42nd UK Parliament}}
{{By-elections to the 42nd UK Parliament}}


[[Category:1964 elections in the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:1964 elections in the United Kingdom|Winchester by-election ]]
[[Category:By-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Hampshire constituencies]]
[[Category:By-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Hampshire constituencies]]
[[Category:1964 in England]]
[[Category:1964 in England|Winchester by-election ]]
[[Category:Politics of Winchester]]
[[Category:Politics of Winchester]]
[[Category:20th century in Hampshire]]
[[Category:20th century in Hampshire]]
[[Category:May 1964 events in the United Kingdom|Winchester by-election]]



{{England-UK-Parl-by-election-stub}}
{{England-UK-Parl-by-election-stub}}

Latest revision as of 07:16, 9 January 2024

The 1964 Winchester by-election was held on 14 May 1964. It was held after the incumbent Conservative MP Peter Smithers was appointed as the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe. It was retained for the Conservative Party by their candidate Morgan Morgan-Giles.

Background

[edit]

The by-election was one of four (the others being Bury St Edmunds, Devizes and Rutherglen being held on the same day in which the seat was being defended by a candidate supporting the incumbent Conservative government. With a general election due later in the year, the results were anticipated with interest as pointer to what might happen at the election.[1] According to The Glasgow Herald, unlike the other three seats, Winchester was expected to be an easy win for the Conservatives, although it was expected that the Conservative majority would be cut.[1]

Result

[edit]
Winchester by-election, 1964[2]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative Morgan Morgan-Giles 18,032 52.17 −15.09
Labour C. Patrick Seyd 11,968 34.62 +1.88
Liberal J. Edwards 4,567 13.21 New
Majority 6,064 17.55 −26.98
Turnout 34,567
Conservative hold Swing

Aftermath

[edit]

While the Conservatives held Winchester, it was reported that if the swing of 8.5% from Conservative to Labour were repeated at the general election it would give the latter a majority of over 170 seats. However, the result at Devizes showed a much lower swing to Labour.[3] The Conservatives lost Rutherglen, but held Bury St Edmund's, the last of the seats to declare, with what was reported by The Glasgow Herald to be a smaller swing against them than expected. The same newspaper noted that while the four results gave a mixed picture, with Winchester seeing the biggest swing against the Conservatives, overall they cast doubt on opinion polls suggesting a significant national Labour lead and perhaps would give Harold Wilson "the first faint incredulous thoughts" that he might not prevail at the coming general election.[4]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Testing the Electorate. Hopes and Fears in Four Constituencies". The Glasgow Herald. 14 May 1964. Retrieved 29 July 2018.
  2. ^ "1964 By Election Results". Archived from the original on 31 August 2009. Retrieved 19 September 2015.
  3. ^ "Socialists' Smell of Election Victory". The Glasgow Herald. 15 May 1964. Retrieved 29 July 2018.
  4. ^ "Government Retain Bury St Edmunds. Happier Days Again for Tory Workers". The Glasgow Herald. 16 May 1964. p. 7. Retrieved 16 October 2021.