Jump to content

Talk:Great Artesian Basin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6beta2)
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Geography}}, {{WikiProject Geology}}, {{WikiProject Water}}, {{WikiProject Australia}}.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Geography|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Geography |importance=high}}
{{WPBS|1=
{{WikiProject Geography|class=start|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Geology |importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Geology|class=C|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Water }}
{{WikiProject Water}}
{{WikiProject Australia |importance=High}}
{{WP Australia|class=start|importance=High}}
}}
}}

==Requests==
==Requests==
* Remove strange link to http://www.hawthornfc.com.au/ at the head of the article.
* Remove strange link to http://www.hawthornfc.com.au/ at the head of the article.

Latest revision as of 11:54, 10 January 2024

Requests

[edit]

Comments

[edit]

8.7 million cubic metres of water sound way too low Gtoomey 01:21, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Quote: It is the source of most of the water used in these areas. The basin is an important source of water for cattle raising. Whilst unsuitable for irrigation, it is adequate for stock and domestic usage (with treatment) and is thus vital to human activity. To tap it, bores are drilled down to a suitable rock layer, where the pressure of the water forces it up, mostly without pumping. Additionally, water at 98°C (208°F) from the basin is used to power a small 150 kW generator in Birdsville.

In 1983 there were close to 18 000 bores providing 1575 million litres of water. This included just under 2000 freely flowing bores and more than 9000 that required mechanical power to bring water to the surface.


I guess this means that of 11000 bores, 2000 don't use a pump and 9000 do use a pump. But the whole lot is unsourced anyway so who'se counting? 05:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

I disagree with the assertion that "nothing has been done". More than half the free flowing bores have been capped in recent years, and all should be capped and piped within the next ten years. This has cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Limitations on new drilling have been in place for decades. In general it appears the contributors to this article have no idea about what they are talking about when it comes to the management of the GAB, and also have little idea about the realities of sustainable groundwater management. If this were not the case, it would be reasonable to expect that there would be more than a simple one liner asserting that nothing has been done!

If it takes two million years for groundwater to enter Lake Eyre, please back that up with credible sources showing at least microscale piezometer readings of groundwater flow in that half of the basin. I can't take that measure of time seriously if a couple sentences ago it states "Because the sandstones are permeable, water gradually makes its way through the pores between the sand grains, flowing at a rate of one to five metres per year." Even at the lowest flow of one meter per year, that would require a distance of two thousand kilometers of travel through pores. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.155.222.153 (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly correct. if you take a look at a map of the basin you will see that the basin is 1,800km from east to west at its widest point. Added a academic journal reference for the age of the water.--GILDog (talk) 11:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Great Artesian Basin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Great Artesian Basin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]