Talk:HuffPost: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 20:05, 11 January 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HuffPost article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Media Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Culture Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Skip to talk}}
-I think the table misses the point-- all their bloggers are celebs to some degree.
+{{Talk header|noarchive=yes}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
-And I do't like how it looks. --[[User:Robotwisdom|robotwisdom]] 20:15, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
+{{WikiProject Blogging}}
+{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=Mid}}
-I would certainly argue that it looks like crap right now, and your point about the celebrity of the bloggers is too relative to matter.  If that's the problem, then I would suggest changing the header instead of destroying it.  If not the tables, then you find some way to make this page look presentable.--[[User:TheGrza|The]][[User Talk:TheGrza|<font color="Green">Grza</font>]] 20:24, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
+{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Mid|American=yes|American-importance=Low}}
-:I think it looks better without the tables, and makes more sense without them too. I don't think it's so easy to make a divide between 'celebrity' and 'non-celebrity'. Are most of the "non-celebrities" actually likely to have articles about them anytime soon? I would suggest we don't need to list them at all, it would be simpler to put "There are also many less well known personalities contributing to the Huffington Post" (or something better worded). I think it's more important to have an article saying more about what it is, and what sort of stance it takes, it's noteriety etc than having a list of names. -- [[User:Joolz|Joolz]] 23:01, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
+{{WikiProject Media |importance=Mid}}
-::I do think most of the 'red-link' names will have articles soon, but I haven't heard of most of them.. Nor do I really have a feel for the website as a whole, yet.--[[User:Robotwisdom|robotwisdom]] 23:09, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
+{{WikiProject Culture |importance=Mid}}
+{{WikiProject Websites |importance=Mid}}
-==Self-Reference==
+{{WikiProject United States |importance=Mid}}
-Could you please remove the Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Avoid self-references|self-reference]] from the end of the second paragraph. I would have done it myself but didn't know how to word it. [[User:Evil Monkey|Evil Monkey]]&#8756;[[User talk:Evil Monkey|Hello]] 00:08, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
+}}
+{{User:MiszaBot/config
-I added small notations about both people at the bottom of the other pages.  I hope to actually write their biographies soon, but it's taken care of now.--[[User:TheGrza|The]][[User Talk:TheGrza|<font color="Green">Grza</font>]] 00:17, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
+| algo                = old(30d)
+| archive             = Talk:HuffPost/Archive %(counter)d
-== Snarky comment ==
+| counter             = 2
+| maxarchivesize      = 100K
-So...where's the article?
+| archiveheader       = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
+| minthreadstoarchive = 1
-All I'm seeing is a [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_general_knowledge_base|list of loosely associated persons]]. -- [[User:Cyrius|Cyrius]]|[[User talk:Cyrius|&#9998;]] 22:05, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
+| minthreadsleft      = 0
+}}
-:We're waiting for you to write it?
+{{Archives|auto=yes|search=yes}}
-:My excuse for the long lists is that it's the easiest way to check who already has articles.  I suspect the Wiki-correct way to list these names would be to create a category, but that wouldn't help for the names without articles. --[[User:Robotwisdom|robotwisdom]] 22:31, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
-::I tend to agree with Cyrius, therefore I've removed all the non-notables (ie, those without articles) from this page, I've also tried to divide the notables into more managable sections. I don't think that merely contributing to this blog is reason enough for people to have their own articles either. -- [[User:Joolz|Joolz]] 23:07, 24 May 2005 (UTC)