Jump to content

Talk:Auckland Region: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reassess as better than "Start" class
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject New Zealand}}, {{WikiProject Auckland}}.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject New Zealand|class=C|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Auckland|class=C|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject New Zealand|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Auckland|importance=Top}}
}}
{{New Zealand English}}


== [[Geology of Auckland Region]] ==
== [[Geology of Auckland Region]] ==


Should [[Geology of Auckland Region]] be referenced from this article? [[User:Blacksmith|Blacksmith]] ([[User talk:Blacksmith|talk]]) 05:23, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Should [[Geology of Auckland Region]] be referenced from this article? [[User:Blacksmith|Blacksmith]] ([[User talk:Blacksmith|talk]]) 05:23, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
:Absolutely. I suggest you create a new "Geology" section with the {{tl|Main}} template linking to the geology article, and the lede paragraph of that article as the content. The existing "Volcanic field" section could be a subsection of it.-<font face="cursive" color="#808080">[[User talk:gadfium|gadfium]]</font> 06:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
:Absolutely. I suggest you create a new "Geology" section with the {{tl|Main}} template linking to the geology article, and the lede paragraph of that article as the content. The existing "Volcanic field" section could be a subsection of it.-[[User talk:gadfium|<span style="font-family:cursive; color:#808080;">gadfium</span>]] 06:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


== Article for the Auckland super city ==
== Article for the Auckland super city ==

Latest revision as of 01:16, 12 January 2024

Should Geology of Auckland Region be referenced from this article? Blacksmith (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. I suggest you create a new "Geology" section with the {{Main}} template linking to the geology article, and the lede paragraph of that article as the content. The existing "Volcanic field" section could be a subsection of it.-gadfium 06:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article for the Auckland super city

[edit]

I have made a suggestion for merging Auckland Region into the Auckland article after the super city comes into being. Please discuss at Talk:Auckland#Article for the Auckland super city. Nurg (talk) 01:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Northland Region which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bay of Plenty Region which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]