Talk:Hampton University: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:24, 13 January 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hampton University article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Virginia High‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

African diaspora Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Talk header}}
-{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
-{{WikiProject Virginia
+{{WikiProject Virginia| importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|importance=High}}
-| class=C
+{{WikiProject Higher education}}
-| importance=high}}
-{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=Start|importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject African diaspora|importance=Top}}
-{{WikiProject Universities|class=start}}
-{{WikiProject African diaspora|class=Start|importance=Top}}
 }}
-{{Image requested|in=Virginia}}
-==Fair use rationale for Image:HamptonU.jpg==
-[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]]
-'''[[:Image:HamptonU.jpg]]''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in '''this''' Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate fair use template]], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|fair use]].
-Please go to [[:Image:HamptonU.jpg|the image description page]] and edit it to include a [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline |fair use rationale]]. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
-If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 -->
-[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 23:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
-==Photos==
-The photo has some illustrations but additional photos and/or photo uploads are needed to improve the article.
-*HABS or HAER photos may be available for this site. [http://lcweb2.loc.gov/pp/hhquery.html Search HABS/HAER here]
-*Seemingly all of the 17 photos accompanying NRHP document (linked in article) are taken by NPS employee and Federal NPS owned, hence public domain and can be used. [http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natreghome.do?searchtype=natreghome Search NPS focus here, please select the highest resolution JPG versions]
-*New photos would be helpful.
-==School shooting==
-I added a section about the recent 2009 shooting according to the suggested standard of larger school shootings to be featured in standalone articles and smaller school shootings to be featured under their respective school's page. As with the [[University_of_P%C3%A9cs#Spree_shooting| University of Pécs shooting]] for example. [[User:SerialKillerWiki|SerialKillerWiki]] ([[User talk:SerialKillerWiki|talk]]) 06:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
-==Assessment comment==
-{{Substituted comment|length=276|lastedit=20061029183117|comment=needs inline citations [[User:Dinosaur puppy|<font style{{nw=}}"background:yellow" face{{nw=}}"Verdana" color{{nw=}}"darkgreen">T REX</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:Dinosaur puppy|<font style{{nw=}}"background:darkgreen" face{{nw=}}"Tahoma" color{{nw=}}"yellow"><b>speak</b></font>]]</sub> 18:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)}}
-Substituted at 17:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
-== Alumni Factor ranking ==
-I recently removed a reference to [https://www.alumnifactor.com/top-177-colleges Alumni Factor] with a request with a note asking that editors "please discuss in Talk why this should be included in this (or any other) article e.g., no concrete description of methodology, no evidence of noteworthiness)."  Instead of discussing anything in Talk or presenting any evidence, [[User:Broadmoor|Broadmoor]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hampton_University&oldid=prev&diff=724258193 reverted] my edit with an edit summary of "Read the website and it's growing in popularity as one of the premier ranking publications."  First, I have read the website and it has no specific details about its methodology.  Second, we have no evidence whatsoever that the website is either "growing in popularity" or a "premier ranking publication." [[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] ([[User talk:ElKevbo|talk]]) 10:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
-::You're being petty and combative as usual. Instead of removing the cited fact because you didn't like it like you did, you should've started a talk page for discussion before it was removed after we came to a consensus on the matter. And you should've started the talk page because only you have a problem with it, I don't feel like a talk page on the matter is needed so I didn't start one.  AND YOU CLEARLY DID NOT DO YOUR RESEARCH BECAUSE IF YOU DID YOU'LL KNOW THAT THEY RANK UNIVERSITIES BASED ON ALUMNI SATISFICATION AND SUCCESS.  Many universities have cited The Alumni Factor on their official website and many reputable publications has praised the new ranking system they invented so it's a legitimate ranking system. A simple google search validates everything I stated.  See this is why I can't take you seriously, you don't do due diligence, you're not fair, and then you play the victim as if you're not in the wrong.[[User:Broadmoor|Broadmoor]] ([[User talk:Broadmoor|talk]]) 12:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)