Talk:Big Bayou Canot rail accident: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 20:23, 13 January 2024

Alabama

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Operations High‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	January 19, 2021

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Operations task force.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 22, 2017 and September 22, 2018.

Untitled

Is it Conot or Canot?. I wrote this article and the World Almanac says Conot, more Google hits on Canot though 129.177.61.124 10:55, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I say it's Canot, I'm from Mobile, and the name sounds much more familiar.

The NTSB uses "Canot" in its report on the accident ( http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1994/RAR9401.htm ), as do other news sources referring to the incident. Almost all Google hits for "Conot" are from Wikipedia's mirrors. Therefore I believe "Conot" is a mistake.

Analysis

I don't see the basis for this article including "it is likely that the size and number of barges pushed by one tug had increased over time in excess of what the bridge could handle in a collision" added by User:Tabletop in the analysis portion of the article.

I am not aware of any changes in the loading criteria for barge impact on railroad bridges -- is there really a factual justification for this comment (if so, eliminate the "it is likely...") or is this pure speculation which doesn't belong in this article? —Mmathu (talk) 05:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The tugboat must have gone into reverse after the collision. There is no involvement with the barges during the accident. Consequently, the tugboat went into reverse after the collision. [rem486] Rem486 (talk) 18:40, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disaster article naming convention

With an interest to create consistency in rail accident naming, I propose that this article be moved to 1993 Big Bayou Canot train wreck. Highspeed (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, why was the page moved without discussion and consensus on the talk page here? It had been previouslydecided that all articles concerning individual disasters should be <<year>> <<place>> <<event>>. Can you advise why we're moving this? I'll move it back in a week if there is no response, as that would indicate that the mover didn't really care. Highspeed (talk) 04:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable passengers?

Is it worth mentioning that R. C. Sproul and his wife were passengers on the Sunset Limited at the time of the wreck?^[1] --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 05:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^ Sproul, R. C. (May 28, 2009). "Providence and Accidents" (audio). Renewing your Mind with Dr. R.C. Sproul - Providence: God in Control collection. Ligonier Ministries. p. Starting at 2:57. Retrieved June 30, 2009.

No Citation Needed

Why is there a "citation needed" link included under Analysis? It's clearly shown that this comes from the Seconds from Disaster episode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.254.71 (talk) 11:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Picture

Why are all the train incident pictures disappearing from Wikipedia (Ufton Nervet rail crash, is another) disappearing?--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 02:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology (pendatry) Collision vs Allision?

Strictly speaking, the term "collision" is used to describe a vessel striking another vessel (or theoretically, any other moving object). The term used to describe a vessel striking a fixed object is "allision".^[1]^[2]

I haven't made any changes since the word isn't in common usage, and may be confusing unless it's explained or pointed to a definition. I'm not certain of WP policies for this sort of thing, so any suggestions welcomed. Shobble (talk) 12:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://secure.wikimedia.org/wiktionary/en/wiki/allision. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
^ http://gcaptain.com/maritime-word-of-the-day-allision?742. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1] Sproul, R. C. (May 28, 2009). "Providence and Accidents" (audio). Renewing your Mind with Dr. R.C. Sproul - Providence: God in Control collection. Ligonier Ministries. p. Starting at 2:57. Retrieved June 30, 2009.

[2] ttps://secure.wikimedia.org/wiktionary/en/wiki/allision. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[3] ttp://gcaptain.com/maritime-word-of-the-day-allision?742. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1]

[1]

[2]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
+{{WikiProject Alabama}}
+{{WikiProject Death|importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Trains|importance=high|refimprove=yes|mapneeded=yes|operations=yes|portaldykdate=January 19, 2021}}
+}}
+{{OnThisDay|date1=2017-09-22|oldid1=801912226|date2=2018-09-22|oldid2=860630160}}
+==Untitled==
 Is it ''Conot'' or ''Canot''?. I wrote this article and the [[World Almanac]] says ''Conot'', more [[Google]] hits on ''Canot'' though [[User:129.177.61.124|129.177.61.124]] 10:55, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 I say it's Canot, I'm from Mobile, and the name sounds much more familiar.
+----
+The NTSB uses "Canot" in its report on the accident ( http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1994/RAR9401.htm ), as do other news sources referring to the incident.  Almost all Google hits for "Conot" are from Wikipedia's mirrors.  Therefore I believe "Conot" is a mistake.
+== Analysis ==
+I don't see the basis for this article including "it is likely that the size and number of barges pushed by one tug had increased over time in excess of what the bridge could handle in a collision" added by User:Tabletop in the analysis portion of the article.
+I am not aware of any changes in the loading criteria for barge impact on railroad bridges -- is there really a factual justification for this comment (if so, eliminate the "it is likely...") or is this pure speculation which doesn't belong in this article? —[[User:Mmathu|Mmathu]] ([[User talk:Mmathu|talk]]) 05:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
+The tugboat must have gone into reverse after the collision. There is no involvement with the barges during the accident. Consequently, the tugboat went into reverse after the collision. [rem486]  [[User:Rem486|Rem486]] ([[User talk:Rem486|talk]]) 18:40, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
+== [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Disaster_management/Naming|Disaster article naming convention]] ==
+With an interest to create consistency in rail accident naming, I propose that this article be moved to [[1993 Big Bayou Canot train wreck]]. [[User:Highspeed|Highspeed]] ([[User talk:Highspeed|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
+:OK, why was the page moved without discussion and consensus on the talk page here?  It had been previously[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Disaster_management/Naming|decided]] that all articles concerning individual disasters should be <<year>> <<place>> <<event>>. Can you advise why we're moving this? I'll move it back in a week if there is no response, as that would indicate that the mover didn't really care. [[User:Highspeed|Highspeed]] ([[User talk:Highspeed|talk]]) 04:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
+== Notable passengers? ==
+Is it worth mentioning that [[R. C. Sproul]] and his wife were passengers on the ''Sunset Limited'' at the time of the wreck?<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ligonier.org/rym.php|title=Providence and Accidents|work=Renewing your Mind with Dr. R.C. Sproul - Providence: God in Control collection|date=May 28, 2009|publisher=Ligonier Ministries|author=Sproul, R. C.|accessdate=June 30, 2009|page=Starting at 2:57|format=audio}}</ref>  --''[[User:Philosopher|Philosopher]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Philosopher|Let us reason together.]]</sup> 05:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
+{{reflist}}
+== No Citation Needed ==
+Why is there a "citation needed" link included under Analysis?  It's clearly shown that this comes from the ''Seconds from Disaster'' episode.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.57.254.71|66.57.254.71]] ([[User talk:66.57.254.71|talk]]) 11:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== The Picture ==
+Why are all the train incident pictures disappearing from Wikipedia ([[Ufton Nervet rail crash]], is another) disappearing?--[[User:The Navigators|The Navigators]] ([[User Talk:The Navigators|talk]])-May [[British Rail]] Rest in Peace. 02:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
+== Terminology (pendatry) Collision vs Allision? ==
+Strictly speaking, the term ''"collision"'' is used to describe a vessel striking another vessel (or theoretically, any other moving object). The term used to describe a vessel striking a fixed object is ''"allision"''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://secure.wikimedia.org/wiktionary/en/wiki/allision}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://gcaptain.com/maritime-word-of-the-day-allision?742}}</ref>
+I haven't made any changes since the word isn't in common usage, and may be confusing unless it's explained or pointed to a definition. I'm not certain of WP policies for this sort of thing, so any suggestions welcomed. [[User:Shobble|Shobble]] ([[User talk:Shobble|talk]]) 12:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
+{{Reflist-talk}}